"The Postman" - or, the value of a united, armed movement

Status
Not open for further replies.

Golden Hound

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
778
This quote in the thread about "Red Dawn" reminded me of another great pro-gun "SHTF" movie: The Postman.

I realized what the critics really hated was the last scene, like the last sceen in "The Postman", a flash-forward that shows we won!

That movie, in my opinion, is even better than Red Dawn, but it was universally panned by critics and it received none of the cult following that Red Dawn did. Part of it is due to the extreme length of the film, more than 3 hours, and part of it is because there were a lot of laughably cheesy scenes in it. But The Postman had much more subtlety and depth to the "SHTF" scenario that it presented.

The enemies in The Postman are not simple Communists or another group that can be unambiguously painted as good or evil. What they are, is an army of regular Americans who basically decided that they were going to take advantage of the post-apocalyptic SHTF scenario to do whatever they wanted - steal food, rape women, etc - under a very specific philosophy advocated by their leader, General Bethlehem, that there are "lords and vassals" in life and that the only men who are honorable are those who take what they want by force.

The good guys are the small rural communities in Oregon who are exploited by Bethlehem and his "Holnist Army" (which worships a philosopher named Nathan Holn who founded their group based on his ideals.) They live a pastoral existence, like Medieval serfs, and are unarmed. They reason that the only way for them to survive is for them to keep giving the Holnist Army whatever they want (the appeasement philosophy) and that they "can't fight back" because they don't have the will or the ability.

Kevin Costner's character changes all that, by creating a "postal service." Initially it's just intended to deliver mail as a way of giving the people hope in the knowledge that there are other communities out there that they can stay in contact with, but it becomes something much more - the postal service actually turns into a revolutionary movement that seeks to unite all of the rural communities together and overthrow General Bethlehem (I think this is an allegory for the American Revolution.)

So through the postal service, the small rural communities unite together, and they form a powerful army of militias and guerrillas. They learn to be a people who will fight for freedom instead of submit to tyranny, and trade in their passive lifestyle for a sense of brotherhood and unity against the evil "Holnists." But most of all the lesson is that the true power in a "SHTF" scenario of nationwide proportions lies in people uniting together and strength in numbers. It is a very good contrast to all of the Max Max type movies which show a "lone wolf" warrior all by himself, against the big bad world - a mentality which in real life would guarantee failure.

I really like this movie, for this reason. I'm curious what the others here think of it? I know it is not as popular as Red Dawn or as action-oriented but I believe it is a very relevant movie to many of the topics we discuss here.

By the way - and to tie it in directly with firearms - the "bad guys" all have M16s, and the "good guys" are mostly armed with Garands and hunting rifles!
 
I liked it, very much.

the only thing that bothered me is why Kevin Kostner always think he has to be a "stud" in a post apocalyptic world (see waterworld, postman)..

Anyway, that movie did not desserve all the bad critics it got.. the only bad part, in my opinion, was the too good ending of the movie (people throwing their guns away).
 
I also really believe the movie well done. The postal service unified the communities.
 
I loved this movie. It is my favorite EOTWAWKI kind of movie, and I think it is a great example of what actual anarchy in this country would be like. At least my vision of what it would be like.

The movie also really makes me want to go out and buy a KISS AR15 ;)

I have a feeling that the new Daniel Craig movie Defiance will also get a cult following as a SHTF movie.
 
The idea that the critics didn't like them because "we" won is just silly. They didn't like them because they weren't very good movies.

While I liked both movies for their weapons and tidbits on tactics the real meat of the story was that organized effort on the part of the population is the key to security and safety. The isolated loosely organized groups didn't have a chance against the organized forces. In "The Postman" you were dealing with the cliche' medieval society where loosely organized hamlets fell prey to the war lord. Larger, better organized groups stood a better chance and the combined effort of several of these better organized groups eventually succeeded. The whole myth of the "lone wolf" is just that, a myth.
 
Last edited:
I like the Postman, but then I like those kinds of movies. Overall, it was a great idea poorly done. If they kept the good stuff, threw out the bad, and re shot some more good scenes, it could be a really good movie. :)
 
The Postman was too long by about 40 minutes (like of most of Costner's movies) and poorly storied. The main character seems almost at times to be manic-depressive except that he lacks much personality or depth. If you are going to make a movie as long as that one you could at least explore the character a little.

The ideas behind the movie are not too bad but I was having a lot of problems suspending disbelief.
 
^^Totally agree. I just don't think Costner has the acting chops to pull-off the reluctant hero, he sure loves to try though! IMO he needs a good partner, someone who isn't afraid to edit and/or streamline. Someone who isn't in love with seeing himself on screen so much...
 
Costner likes to play a hero that the audience doesn't particularly like. Almost an anti-hero. His fatal flaw is that he does it well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top