Low-Sci
Member
Thats kind of my point though. It would be ugly. It would be hideous. The other 49 states have a policy against terrorism, and the insurgency in Miss Texiana would definately fall into that terrorist category as far as the administration of the other 49 would be concerned.
So they wouldn't get crushed out, but you would have created a situation very like Israel and Palestine. One side would say Texiana is right here, stop trying to take it from us, and the other, larger, more powerful, better funded side would say "the hell it is, that's texas, and thats luisiana. We'll build you a wall to prove it."
Ultimately it would be the public of Texiana that would suffer the most if a war had to break out, because the fight would obviously be almost wholly in their territory in civilian areas. And since the insurgeny would never bend, and neither would the occupation, the "fight" if you can really call it that would go on forever.
I paint an ugly picture because that's what it would be. A war of one state against the other 49 for independence, if it had to be a war, would be extremely ugly.
So they wouldn't get crushed out, but you would have created a situation very like Israel and Palestine. One side would say Texiana is right here, stop trying to take it from us, and the other, larger, more powerful, better funded side would say "the hell it is, that's texas, and thats luisiana. We'll build you a wall to prove it."
Ultimately it would be the public of Texiana that would suffer the most if a war had to break out, because the fight would obviously be almost wholly in their territory in civilian areas. And since the insurgeny would never bend, and neither would the occupation, the "fight" if you can really call it that would go on forever.
I paint an ugly picture because that's what it would be. A war of one state against the other 49 for independence, if it had to be a war, would be extremely ugly.