All arguments of banners are moot. We have 2A. If they repeal 2A we have a big problem.
This statement misses the point, again. As Frank Ettin has explained the surface prose is not a magic spell. It is interpreted by SCOTUS and sometimes legislatively or by executive action. Moot - well, Heller was 5/4. If it was 4/5, that would have been the game. The prose was interpreted differently. Unless gun people get that through their heads, such statements are worthless.
Call up Donald Trump and tell him that his bump stock ban is moot because of the Second Amendment. See how far that gets you.
Whom do you think actually changes the situation on the ground, in the stores, how you carry?
Magic MOOT - conjure me a Glock 18.
Dear Moot Magician - I don't want you to have a 30 round mag which makes it easy to kill folks in my church, synagogue, elementary school, Hindu temple, mosque, Jewish Deli, party in San Bernadino, a concert at Las Vegas, a university building, a movie theater and the mall.
What is your argument that you should have such?
1. You won't comply and you will be criminal
2. You can easily kill as many with 10 round magazines
3. It is a divine proclamation
That's what I'm hearing here. Why did Donald go against the will of God, and make many criminals? Did the moot spell fail on him?
Why did women not vote, blacks be slaves, school segregated, etc. and then that changed? Society changed and that was reflected in the Courts, legislatures, executive actions and Constitutional changes.
Unless, the RKBA can win the social battle, it's sunk. The battle is not with choir cliches. Some logical arguments might work. Some emotional appeals might work.