PolarPanda
Member
Hi all.
So, I recently had my 870 duracoated. After the coating, I gave it a thorough cleaning and lube job, then took it to the ranger for the first time in 8 years. I noticed right away, when firing slugs through the 20" rifled barrel, the slide was very very stiff... to the point of needing both hands to pull it back. I promptly stopped shooting, unloaded, took it home, dissassembled, cleaned thoroughly again, inspected, and went back to the range. On the second trip, the slide was noticably easier, but still dificult to cycle. I picked up a few of the hulls and brought them home. Upon comparing fired to unfired(but chambered) hulls, I noticed the fired hulls were marred up on the brass. Putting a caliper to them relieled that the brass part of the fired hulls were anywhere from .3mm to .6mm larger in diameter then the unfired hulls. The gap between the plastic and the brass was fully wide enough for me to stick my thumbnail down in. You can look and see that the thinkness of the brass is thinner on the slugs then on any of the other shells I have.
Now, I know the shotgun did nothing but sit in a gunsafe for 8 years while I was off playing Army games. I dont see how that could/would have an effect on anything. The 'smith that did the coating has a very good reputation, and once again, I dont see how that could/would have an effect on anything. With what I have listed about what I have found with the slugs, I am very inclined to believe that that is the problem, but am not completely sold on anything at this point.
Does anyone see anything wrong with the logic that the problem is with the rounds and not the shotgun?
BTW, Federal slugs.
TIA
So, I recently had my 870 duracoated. After the coating, I gave it a thorough cleaning and lube job, then took it to the ranger for the first time in 8 years. I noticed right away, when firing slugs through the 20" rifled barrel, the slide was very very stiff... to the point of needing both hands to pull it back. I promptly stopped shooting, unloaded, took it home, dissassembled, cleaned thoroughly again, inspected, and went back to the range. On the second trip, the slide was noticably easier, but still dificult to cycle. I picked up a few of the hulls and brought them home. Upon comparing fired to unfired(but chambered) hulls, I noticed the fired hulls were marred up on the brass. Putting a caliper to them relieled that the brass part of the fired hulls were anywhere from .3mm to .6mm larger in diameter then the unfired hulls. The gap between the plastic and the brass was fully wide enough for me to stick my thumbnail down in. You can look and see that the thinkness of the brass is thinner on the slugs then on any of the other shells I have.
Now, I know the shotgun did nothing but sit in a gunsafe for 8 years while I was off playing Army games. I dont see how that could/would have an effect on anything. The 'smith that did the coating has a very good reputation, and once again, I dont see how that could/would have an effect on anything. With what I have listed about what I have found with the slugs, I am very inclined to believe that that is the problem, but am not completely sold on anything at this point.
Does anyone see anything wrong with the logic that the problem is with the rounds and not the shotgun?
BTW, Federal slugs.
TIA