StrikeFire83
Member
Hello, all.
Okay, so I'm a 9mm guy. I love em, I shoot em well, and I'm pretty confident in the bullet's ability to stop/kill a human, so I don't really care to get into the caliber war debate.
However, I do own two guns that I NEVER shoot.
1) Kel-Tec P3AT: Hard chromed slide with OD green frame. I bought this gun 3 years ago intending to use it for pocket carry, and I put about 3 boxes of ammo through it. The gun functioned fine, but I didn't care for the recoil, trigger, anything really. Shortly afterward I bought a Kahr PM9 which I now shoot well. Ammo for the Kahr is cheaper, the Kahr has a better trigger, and 9mm is superior to .380. Also, I can pocket carry the Kahr in every pair of pants/shorts that I own, which kind of renders the Kel-Tec irrelevant.
Here's my latest range report with the Kahr PM9: http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=575400&highlight=
2) S&W 638: I bought it several years ago because I felt I "needed" to own a j-frame. I've put about 1000 rounds through the gun, and I find it very hard to fire both quickly and accurately. Pretty solid accuracy in single action, "acceptable" in double action but not nearly as good as I am with my Kahr PM9. Again, the PM9 pocket carries better than the 638 and has better capacity and reload-ability. Also, .38 Special is expensive, and I'm not in a position to be able to reload anytime soon.
SO....finally, I'm thinking of selling both of these guns to fund a sub-compact, double stack 9mm like the Glock 26, XD-3" or S&W compact. I really feel like it would fill the void between my service sized 9s (Glock 17 & CZ-75b) and my pocket 9 (Kahr PM9). Anyhow, your thoughts would be greatly appreciated!
Okay, so I'm a 9mm guy. I love em, I shoot em well, and I'm pretty confident in the bullet's ability to stop/kill a human, so I don't really care to get into the caliber war debate.
However, I do own two guns that I NEVER shoot.
1) Kel-Tec P3AT: Hard chromed slide with OD green frame. I bought this gun 3 years ago intending to use it for pocket carry, and I put about 3 boxes of ammo through it. The gun functioned fine, but I didn't care for the recoil, trigger, anything really. Shortly afterward I bought a Kahr PM9 which I now shoot well. Ammo for the Kahr is cheaper, the Kahr has a better trigger, and 9mm is superior to .380. Also, I can pocket carry the Kahr in every pair of pants/shorts that I own, which kind of renders the Kel-Tec irrelevant.
Here's my latest range report with the Kahr PM9: http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=575400&highlight=
2) S&W 638: I bought it several years ago because I felt I "needed" to own a j-frame. I've put about 1000 rounds through the gun, and I find it very hard to fire both quickly and accurately. Pretty solid accuracy in single action, "acceptable" in double action but not nearly as good as I am with my Kahr PM9. Again, the PM9 pocket carries better than the 638 and has better capacity and reload-ability. Also, .38 Special is expensive, and I'm not in a position to be able to reload anytime soon.
SO....finally, I'm thinking of selling both of these guns to fund a sub-compact, double stack 9mm like the Glock 26, XD-3" or S&W compact. I really feel like it would fill the void between my service sized 9s (Glock 17 & CZ-75b) and my pocket 9 (Kahr PM9). Anyhow, your thoughts would be greatly appreciated!
Last edited: