This is why gun registration is wrong

Status
Not open for further replies.

GlowinPontiac

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2007
Messages
585
Location
Central CT
http://www.courant.com/news/local/mr/durham/hc-durbullets0723.artjul23,0,1051176.story

He did say that troopers were looking for the owners of the 54 weapons in Connecticut capable of shooting .50-caliber rounds

This all started when a resident of a house a mile and a half downrange and on the other side of a mountain claimed that a rifle bullet from Blue Trail Range struck his house and landed directly in his daughters bed.

So far they have not been able to prove that any of the rounds that struck the house came from Blue Trail Range. There are lots of woods around the range that are used for hunting and some people go there to target shoot even though it is not their property.

From what I have read and heard from local news sources the police are asking people to voluntarily turn in any .50 cal rifles they may own so that ballistics testing can be performed on them to see if they fired the bullet that struck a house miles away from the range. It scares me that they know exactly how many .50's are supposedly in state at this time. Also this testing will be conducted in Mass. If somebody turns in their rifle for testing what do you think the chances are of them getting it back? With CT and MA being some of the most anti-gun states in the northeast I would say the chances are pretty slim.

Now the question is how much longer will it be before this voluntary turn in becomes mandatory and the police begin confiscation? What happens to the guns brought into mass? Can the MA police confiscate them if they are not MA legal even though CT police brought them into the state?

How long before someone else comes forward with a random bullet they found near their house and the police begin asking people to turn in every gun they own in that caliber?

Here is another good one. Just like that Iraqi lady holding up live rounds and claiming somebody shot them through her house! http://www.wtnh.com/Global/story.asp?S=8432275&nav=3YeX2ScG

News Channel 8 followed Dinatale and his neighbors into the wooded area on his property earlier this month to find dozens of shells. Dinatale says each one was motivation to file a lawsuit against the range, and the town of Wallingford, Wednesday morning.

If they are finding shells on his property then it stands to reason that the bullets hitting his house are coming from his own property. It could be people illegally shooting on his land or he could be dumb enough to shoot his own house in an attempt to get the range shut down.
Check this link out for more information on what is happening with the range.
http://www.savebluetrailrange.org/
 
Something isn't kosher here... They are wanting people to turn in .50 cal weapons to clear their name, they are finding shells on the property (.50 cal??) and the house is miles from the range. Hmmmm The likelyhood of some bullets actually coming from that gun club and actually hitting the house after a trip of several miles is pretty dang remote.

Gun registration is a joke. Gun Owners will be required to produce their weapons in order to clear their name, further to that, any registration contains verbage that requires you to produce your gun when asked OR allows the police unwarranted access to your peice.

It would be one thing, if in "registering" to own a firearm and all that got you out of all the other investigation / background checks etc..., it doesn't. Notice in the states that have it, states that hate guns, the registration is always OVER AND ABOVE everything else.
 
Ya know, that's intolerable, and bigoted.

Would anyone care to show me how requesting anyone with a certain make of firearm come in to "clear their name" is substantially different from requesting all the males in a given town give DNA samples to "clear their name" from a rape case?
 
Wow. Those Barretts have one hell of an ejector huh?

I'm guessing CT is home to all 54 of the G3/CETME mechanisms that were modified to fire .50 BMG.

Back on topic - this is absurd. I wouldn't do anything voluntarily, and I would fight in court any attempts to cause involuntary action.
 
Would anyone care to show me how requesting anyone with a certain make of firearm come in to "clear their name" is substantially different from requesting all the males in a given town give DNA samples to "clear their name" from a rape case?

+1

This stuff also makes me want to set up a company to produce EBSR (Evil Barrett Sniper Rifles)
 
i took note of this when the article came out ...

so, any future transfers of controlversial long guns will be done out of state, without any pesky DPS 3 form.
 
Yay, guilty until proven innocent that your gun doesn't ballistically match the found bullet.
 
Maj. Christopher Arciero said troopers have test-fired rifles obtained voluntarily from people who were shooting at the range on Memorial Day, when a .223-caliber bullet pierced the kitchen window of Donna Louisa's house on Tri-Mountain Road, an area that has been struck periodically by stray bullets since at least the 1990s.


He did say that troopers were looking for the owners of the 54 weapons in Connecticut capable of shooting .50-caliber rounds — like the one recovered from Ken and Melissa Divito's yard on Tri-Mountain Road

what is it a 223 or a 50
 
Donna Louisa's house getting struck by a .223 is a separate incident from sue-happy Divito claiming that his has been hit by multiple .50BMG rounds. So it's both.
 
years ago a gun club i belonged to was trying to move to a quarry. a couple of local residents objected and filed a law suit.

one of them testified at a hearing that someone was shooting at her house from the quarry already and held up a fired 22 shell as proof, claiming she found it in her pool. The quarry was 3/4 of a mile away from her house.
 
Donna Louisa's house getting struck by a .223 is a separate incident from sue-happy Divito claiming that his has been hit by multiple .50BMG rounds. So it's both.
maybe this range needs to do something. there may be a legitimate issue here.
 
Maybe they need to put a couple of those gunshot triangulation devices in the area, in case this comes up again. While less than perfect, it would be better than the "guilty until proven innocent" approach they are taking now. At least they could determine whether the shots were coming from the range, or from surrounding property.
 
Never trust the veracity of a passionately self-righteous person.
 
GlowinPontiac said:
It scares me that they know exactly how many .50's are supposedly in state at this time. Also this testing will be conducted in Mass. If somebody turns in their rifle for testing what do you think the chances are of them getting it back? With CT and MA being some of the most anti-gun states in the northeast I would say the chances are pretty slim.

Why does it "scare" you? ALL firearms like that have to be registered with the state police. I had to fill out that form for the last AK (5.45mm) I bought so they know exactly where it is and who owns it. I even had my carry permit and it didn't matter. It doesn't "scare" or surprise me. If they come for it one day, then I simply sold it out of state, which is perfectly legal to do and gets around the 72 hour reporting requirement if it's lost or stolen.

Aside from the stupid AWB, CT is by far from being one of the worst states in the northeast for firearms laws. MD, NJ, NY, MA, etc are MUCH worse. I was surprised how easy it was to get my carry permit and there aren't many places in CT we can't carry. Some very "pro-gun" states have much tighter restrictions on where people can't carry. VA = you have to open carry in any place that serves alcohol. AZ = you can NOT carry anywhere that serves alcohol for on-site consumption. TX = a way to legally ban carrying and make it an actual crime to carry into a properly 30.06 posted establishment. GA and NC have some pretty screwy rules about where you can't carry. CT has none of that. Can even carry into a bar if someone wants to.
 
Quote:
Never trust the veracity of a passionately self-righteous person.
______________________

I don't trust this story at all. It's just too easy to fake a scenario like this. Sort of like the guy (who happened to be a lawyer AND an anti-gun nut) who "found" a bunch of "bullets" laying on the ground at a playground near a police shooting range.

People will often lie to support their beliefs, and will lie to win a payday lawsuit.

Bitter? Who? Me?
 
Sort of like the guy (who happened to be a lawyer AND an anti-gun nut) who "found" a bunch of "bullets" laying on the ground at a playground near a police shooting range.

I got a better one than that. Back when I lived in Arizona, there was a local range that some antis were trying to get shut down. This was in the Prescott area. These retards called out the media to their houses to show where bullets were landing in their yards. Here's the kicker... They just scattered around ENTIRE unfired rounds straight out of the box. Needless to say, their credibility was shut down pretty fast.
 
from the Record Journal; By: George Moore, Staff 05/10/2008 :

The bullet landing area appears to be on Wallingford property, according to town land records. Blue Trail has a legal agreement from 1961 to use the mountainous Wallingford property to stop bullets:eek:, but Durham First Selectwoman Laura Francis and state Rep. Ray Kalinowski said they were disturbed by what they saw.
I would be disturbed, also.

I have never heard of this type of agreement before where a range's 'bullet landing area' is on other peoples' property! This should be rectified immediately if not sooner. I hope that with the NRA's help, that the range can be made safe for the residents in the area as well as for the water resevoir. There is no excuse for unsafe range practices. We have enough of a PR problem without this kind of thing going on.
 
one of them testified at a hearing that someone was shooting at her house from the quarry already and held up a fired 22 shell as proof, claiming she found it in her pool.

A casing? If so, it's probably from a .22RF nail gun. I recently found one in my laundry room from when the contractors finished our basement. The end where the bullet woulda been, had there ever been one, is crimped in a sort of star-shaped pattern (viewed end on).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top