Saw these two stories about the Paris attack and noticed 2 things. The first is that the first gentleman appears to have an M3 submachinegun (could be wrong), otherwise known as a 'grease gun' and the other has a bolt action rifle, on the ground, rather than being up in an elevated position. A bolt action rifle with no scope which will be a poor tool to have when the terrorists have an AK47.
Don't you think they'd have a more modern machine gun? And why would an officer with a bolt action rifle (mostly used by snipers) be on the ground?
Don't they have enough law enforcement weapons in France? Are they scrambling for weapons? And why wouldn't they utilize that sniper properly?
Don't you think they'd have a more modern machine gun? And why would an officer with a bolt action rifle (mostly used by snipers) be on the ground?
Don't they have enough law enforcement weapons in France? Are they scrambling for weapons? And why wouldn't they utilize that sniper properly?