I don't get it; what's the problem with thumbhole stocks? I've been prowling the forums for a while now, and anytime a fire-arm that sports them is mentioned, there seems to be unanimous disapproval for them and suggestions to remove them and swap them with standard furniture. Primarily with AK's.
I think the whole VEPR line of sporting AK's look very attractive. The thumbhole/Dragunov style stocks seem to be more functional and ergonomic anyway, since they almost universally sport a cheek riser.
If people just can't stand that little bridge of wood between the pistol grip and the buttstock, why don't they just strip the finish, saw that part off, sand it even to look nice, and then refinish it? You wouldn't have to expose that cut in the receiver and burn money on a new set of furniture. If I didn't like it, that's what I would do.
I think the whole VEPR line of sporting AK's look very attractive. The thumbhole/Dragunov style stocks seem to be more functional and ergonomic anyway, since they almost universally sport a cheek riser.
If people just can't stand that little bridge of wood between the pistol grip and the buttstock, why don't they just strip the finish, saw that part off, sand it even to look nice, and then refinish it? You wouldn't have to expose that cut in the receiver and burn money on a new set of furniture. If I didn't like it, that's what I would do.