jad0110
Member
As the title might suggest, I am torn. I have an opportunity to buy a very nice revolver, as follows:
Ruger Redhawk (double action)
44 Magnum
5.5" Barrel
Stainless
Asking price: $300, including 50 rounds of 44 Mag and a nylon shoulder rig
According to the owner, the gun maybe has 300 or so rounds through it.
It is certainly an excellent price, and I have plenty of cash to buy it. But it would mean adding two more calibers to my "logistics train" - in handguns, I currently shoot 22LR, 38 Spl, 357 Mag and 45 ACP. Plus, 44 Mag and 44 Spl are darned expensive, though I do reload.
I don't handgun hunt, and I use a 4" 686 and a Mossberg 12 gauge for home protection. I really can't justify the purchase, except for the fact that it is a raging deal. I probably wouldn't shoot it very often, maybe once or twice per year at most. I do think that loaded with 44 Spl, it would make a good car gun.
So what say you? Given what I have said, what would you do in my position?
Ruger Redhawk (double action)
44 Magnum
5.5" Barrel
Stainless
Asking price: $300, including 50 rounds of 44 Mag and a nylon shoulder rig
According to the owner, the gun maybe has 300 or so rounds through it.
It is certainly an excellent price, and I have plenty of cash to buy it. But it would mean adding two more calibers to my "logistics train" - in handguns, I currently shoot 22LR, 38 Spl, 357 Mag and 45 ACP. Plus, 44 Mag and 44 Spl are darned expensive, though I do reload.
I don't handgun hunt, and I use a 4" 686 and a Mossberg 12 gauge for home protection. I really can't justify the purchase, except for the fact that it is a raging deal. I probably wouldn't shoot it very often, maybe once or twice per year at most. I do think that loaded with 44 Spl, it would make a good car gun.
So what say you? Given what I have said, what would you do in my position?