Trophy ballistic tip tips?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Enfielder

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2010
Messages
416
Location
Finger Lakes, Ny
IMG_1635.JPG
I have two piles of .308 bullets that I load 30-06. One is a 180gr fusion bullet and the other is the trophy ballistic tip (pictured).
I use H4831 very successfully with the fusions but I'm hesitant to use it with the trophies.
The reason is the OAL of the projectile is long @1.43" and the canellure is about .740 from the base of the bullet. This makes for some serious compression on the H4831.

My question is: name a powder that won't fill the case like H4831 and that won't be bothered by the length of the bullet. Would IMR4064 fit the bill?
 
Enfielder,
I've used H4831 for years in my 3006 with great success. I put as much in there as my cases will allow and it flat shoots in several different 3006 caliber rifles I've tried it in. Ran out of my dad's old WW SuperX brass he bought from years ago and had laying around. That was tough stuff and has enough internal volume to where I could shoot 59.5 and sometimes 60gr of H4831 with the 180gr bullets. This newer brass from various manufacturers now.. the best I can get is 58.5gr without a big hassle . You can use drop tubes but with the long kernels of H4831 you don't gain a whole lot that route anyway.
My next choice would probably be "the" go to powder for 3006 which is IMR4350. You should gain some internal case volume but still have good velocity and accuracy with that powder. That is what I would try next.

So I have to ask... with your name being "Enfielder", do you happen shoot a 1917 Enfield? If so, same here!


Steve
 
Enfielder,
I've used H4831 for years in my 3006 with great success. I put as much in there as my cases will allow and it flat shoots in several different 3006 caliber rifles I've tried it in. Ran out of my dad's old WW SuperX brass he bought from years ago and had laying around. That was tough stuff and has enough internal volume to where I could shoot 59.5 and sometimes 60gr of H4831 with the 180gr bullets. This newer brass from various manufacturers now.. the best I can get is 58.5gr without a big hassle . You can use drop tubes but with the long kernels of H4831 you don't gain a whole lot that route anyway.
My next choice would probably be "the" go to powder for 3006 which is IMR4350. You should gain some internal case volume but still have good velocity and accuracy with that powder. That is what I would try next.

So I have to ask... with your name being "Enfielder", do you happen shoot a 1917 Enfield? If so, same here!


Steve
I picked up some once fired "deer season range brass" made by FC and Remington. I only got four of the Rem and two Federal. The rest of my brass is Winchester. I was surprised to see my powder come up to almost the mouth of the federal when I was throwing charges. I weighed the three types of brass ans found that the Winchester was the lightest and federal was the heaviest.
To answer the first question: the trophy is also 180 grain. The body of the bullet is mostly copper with a small lead core to flesh out the mushroom when it expands. The fusions are a full lead core and copper jacket. This means the trophy is much longer than the fusions and will compress a lot of powder. I use 57.5gr of H4831 and it makes a fine and accurate round for my 760. I used a grain under max for the trophies of H4895 and got some seriously flattened primers with a few punch through. I don't want to compress the 4831 as much as those bullets would extend into the case to make it to the cannelure. The fusions are fine.
My powders on hand are: IMR 4064, IMR 4831, and H4831.
I cook up a load for my 721 that it loves that uses 48gr of the 4064. I don't have an idea of the case volume used but there is room with the fusions so that the powder rattles when I shake them. I'll try that Friday afternoon.
Regarding my name: I had just bought a #4 in .303 and had committed to it being my primary hunting rifle when I signed up as a member years ago. As it turned out, I didn't even fire that rifle for about 8 years and I certainly didn't take it into the woods. I had a good job then and kinda went on a gun buying binge for a few years. Now I'm trying to get rid of some by narrowing it down to some versatile and accurate rifles and handguns. Obviously, 30-06 is at the top of the keeper list.
 
Try superformance if you can get it, As a ball powder it should allow you to cram more into the case than h4831. Another powder id look at is RL17 (and RL16 if you can get it).
Ive not noticed any temp sensitivity with Superform, but ive had RL-17 loads go from hot to dangerous when left in the sun, so now use it carefully.
 
I could be totally wrong here but just a thought before I've had enough coffee. The federal data I looked at for the trophy bonded tip in .30-06 had the COAL at 3.320.
What COAL do you load the fusion to?
Just to clear up my confusion, are you trying to load 2 different length bullets to the same COAL or trying to load the Trophy to the cannelure? I don't even acknowledge the cannelure when I'm loading bottleneck cartridges. I start at the COAL recommended in the data that I'm using and adjust from there.
 
Since you said it's a mostly copper bullet with a small amount of lead in the tip, I'd probably be inclined to use Barnes data. Screenshot_2019-11-22-07-52-59.png
 
I predominantly shoot IMR4064 and H4350 in .30-06.

Why are you needing to cram so much 4831 into the case? Not hitting the speeds you want? What’s your muzzle velocity demand?
 
I could be totally wrong here but just a thought before I've had enough coffee. The federal data I looked at for the trophy bonded tip in .30-06 had the COAL at 3.320.
What COAL do you load the fusion to?
I haven't measured th COAL to the cannelure. I suppose I can do some math and come up with it but for now, I'll remain mute on it. I will say that I like the cannelure as a standardized place to aim for when reloading as these bullets were designed for this cartridge type.


Just to clear up my confusion, are you trying to load 2 different length bullets to the same COAL or trying to load the Trophy to the cannelure? I don't even acknowledge the cannelure when I'm loading bottleneck cartridges. I start at the COAL recommended in the data that I'm using and adjust from there.

I predominantly shoot IMR4064 and H4350 in .30-06.

Why are you needing to cram so much 4831 into the case? Not hitting the speeds you want? What’s your muzzle velocity demand?
My pet load for H4831 is a compressed load to begin with. I'm getting peak accuracy and performance and don't want to change that. I know I can't expect the same from a completely different bullet type but I'm searching for a powder that doesn't take up the real estate in the case that H4831 does.
 
@Enfielder - the fact you wrote it is my entire point. You’re doing something you know better than doing. So take your own advice.

You’ve said for yourself, you have a load developed - a charge weight under a specific bullet - and it doesn’t fit under a DIFFERENT BULLET. You acknowledge yourself here - you cannot expect two bullets to act the same.

Different bullets, different charges. It’s irresponsible, especially after noting one bullet causes significant powder compression, to simply swap bullets without working up its own load.
 
@Enfielder - the fact you wrote it is my entire point. You’re doing something you know better than doing. So take your own advice.

You’ve said for yourself, you have a load developed - a charge weight under a specific bullet - and it doesn’t fit under a DIFFERENT BULLET. You acknowledge yourself here - you cannot expect two bullets to act the same.

Different bullets, different charges. It’s irresponsible, especially after noting one bullet causes significant powder compression, to simply swap bullets without working up its own load.


Which is why, rather than cram a bullet on top of H4831 in a fashion that I feel isn't safe, I have turned to THR community to ask about powders that take up less space so I can work up a load using a different powder.

Unfortunately, you have chosen to take up space here by stating some truly obvious and redundant points while, at the same time, being quite condescending. You do not have any grounds to be calling me irresponsible when I am exercising due diligence by asking these fine men and women for their experiential advice.

This appears to be the majority of what you do here on THR, but I don't like it and I have a ****ing problem with it. If you actually have a valid contribution to offer this conversation rather than your vapid rants, then by all means, please do. Otherwise, move yourself along.
 
@Enfielder - yet again, I’ve managed to unintentionally ruffle feathers during an attempt to help.

Maybe I’m reading your process incorrectly, so please indulge my explication of my inference here:

You opened the thread saying you have a developed load with Fusions which is highly compressed under the Trophies...

In my first response in this thread, I asked:

Why are you needing to cram so much 4831 into the case? Not hitting the speeds you want? What’s your muzzle velocity demand?

I asked this because I inferred one of two things to be true: 1) what I thought less likely - you’re trying to put the Trophy on top of the load developed for the Fusion, or 2) more likely - you’re not getting the speed you want from a load developed for the Trophy itself.

To which you responded, without really answering the question I had asked:

My pet load for H4831 is a compressed load to begin with. I'm getting peak accuracy and performance and don't want to change that.

From that statement, I apologize if I incorrectly assumed that my FIRST option above was the case. It sounds like your “pet load” is using the Fusion, and this thread reads like you’re trying to put the Trophy on top of that same charge weight you worked up for the Fusion, without doing load development for the Trophy.

I had hoped that question about velocity would encourage a discussion about the load development you’d done with the Trophy, and hoped you’d share more detail about why you’re needing to compress 4831 - hoping you’d share why you needed to keep pushing into compressed loads, and further share why you weren’t finding anything enticing with a lower charge weight.

I had hoped you would share these details because I’d expect you’d be able to very quickly develop an accurate load with little or no compression under the Trophy bullet, might even exceed the precision of your Fusion load. You seem to know better than to expect the same performance by simply throwing a new bullet on top of a charge weight developed with a different bullet. It just doesn’t work that way - which you acknowledged above - hence my confusion here: you know load development doesn’t transfer between different bullets, but you’re trying to transfer load development between different bullets...?

Did you do load work up under the Trophy and fail to find any suitable accuracy? If so, you didn’t mention that, so I’m left inferring what I can from your words on the screen, and it sounds like you developed a load for one bullet and tried to stick it under another bullet. Maybe how I interpreted that was wrong? Did you do a load work up and fall short on your velocity target, hence pushing more and more into the case, and still not getting your desired speed even with a highly compressed load? If so, again, you didn’t state that effort had been pursued, and didn’t answer what velocity you’re needing.

These are the reasons I asked my first question - what velocity are you trying to reach which H4831 isn’t delivering? From there, the rest of the thread reads like you’re trying to shortcut load development, and seeking different powders without really exploring H4831 under the Trophy - if you HAVE done that work, you didn’t mention it, so I apologize for assuming it wasn’t done.
 
@Enfielder - yet again, I’ve managed to unintentionally ruffle feathers during an attempt to help.

Maybe I’m reading your process incorrectly, so please indulge my explication of my inference here:

You opened the thread saying you have a developed load with Fusions which is highly compressed under the Trophies...

In my first response in this thread, I asked:



I asked this because I inferred one of two things to be true: 1) what I thought less likely - you’re trying to put the Trophy on top of the load developed for the Fusion, or 2) more likely - you’re not getting the speed you want from a load developed for the Trophy itself.

To which you responded, without really answering the question I had asked:



From that statement, I apologize if I incorrectly assumed that my FIRST option above was the case. It sounds like your “pet load” is using the Fusion, and this thread reads like you’re trying to put the Trophy on top of that same charge weight you worked up for the Fusion, without doing load development for the Trophy.

I had hoped that question about velocity would encourage a discussion about the load development you’d done with the Trophy, and hoped you’d share more detail about why you’re needing to compress 4831 - hoping you’d share why you needed to keep pushing into compressed loads, and further share why you weren’t finding anything enticing with a lower charge weight.

I had hoped you would share these details because I’d expect you’d be able to very quickly develop an accurate load with little or no compression under the Trophy bullet, might even exceed the precision of your Fusion load. You seem to know better than to expect the same performance by simply throwing a new bullet on top of a charge weight developed with a different bullet. It just doesn’t work that way - which you acknowledged above - hence my confusion here: you know load development doesn’t transfer between different bullets, but you’re trying to transfer load development between different bullets...?

Did you do load work up under the Trophy and fail to find any suitable accuracy? If so, you didn’t mention that, so I’m left inferring what I can from your words on the screen, and it sounds like you developed a load for one bullet and tried to stick it under another bullet. Maybe how I interpreted that was wrong? Did you do a load work up and fall short on your velocity target, hence pushing more and more into the case, and still not getting your desired speed even with a highly compressed load? If so, again, you didn’t state that effort had been pursued, and didn’t answer what velocity you’re needing.

These are the reasons I asked my first question - what velocity are you trying to reach which H4831 isn’t delivering? From there, the rest of the thread reads like you’re trying to shortcut load development, and seeking different powders without really exploring H4831 under the Trophy - if you HAVE done that work, you didn’t mention it, so I apologize for assuming it wasn’t done.
I'll digress and apologize to you. I thank you for your continuing contributions here at THR.
my history with H4831is with 30-06 and .270. Both loads I've worked up with that powder for my rifles are a compressed load. It seems that his powder takes up more volume than others. I have to worked a load up using the Trpohy bullets as it seems to me that if I start at the minimum charges of H4831'iwill be compressing it.
My original question is: are there any powders that take up less case volume at a comparable power level? That is all I'm asking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top