True Stories of the Highway Patrol

Status
Not open for further replies.

Newton

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
1,267
I just got through watching an episode of the above show - here's a rough breakdown of what happened. This took place in Mass.

A young guy was approached when he was found sitting in a parking lot at night and the cops were suspicious of him being there.

He advised them that he was carrying a handgun and they asked him to step out of the vehicle at which point an officer disarmed him. The weapon was a Beretta 92FS carried strong side IWB, the young man had a valid CCW permit which was produced.

The usual questioning began "why do you need a gun", "I mean just look at this thing", "what if you shot someone", "what if some kids attacked you, would you shoot them" etc etc

On removing the magazine, it was found to contain 15 Black Talons (including the chambered round - I guess he didn't top off). Then the questions became more specific:

Q. "What weight are these"
A. "147 grain"
Statement - "You aren't allowed to have 147 grain bullets, that's what we use"
Statement/question (second cop) - "and these are hollow points, they only have one purpose you know, why would you want to have hollow points."
Q. "Did the box say Law Enforcement Only" (please note all you users of Winchester Ranger T)
A. No
Q. "How many more of these do you have at home"
A. "5"
Statement - "Well I'm going to take these 15 and you better hadn't shoot off the other 5 because you may need to bring those in also"

He then gave the now unloaded and useless pistol back to its owner and told him to be on his way and not drive around armed with a gun any more.

The show closed with a statement that Winchester stopped selling Black Talon ammunition to civilians in 1993 and that it was now only available for sale to law enforcement officers, so this was obviously an old show.

=====================================

Now I know this hapened in Mass., not known for being gun friendly, but I have little doubt that these incidents are not unheard of in other states, and as far as I am concerned, they represent Constitutional violations.

How would you have acted in a similar situation.
 
Why I Live In Texas

Down here the cop would probably ask me if I knew where he could get some.

In the case described, I'd probably consult an attorney the next day. Unless Mass. has a specific law against 147gr hollow point ammo like NJ does, then the cops illegally seized private property and violated the victim's civil rights.

The fact that it was caught on tape by a third-party would simply mean a more generous settlement check from the LEOs.
 
A VERY LARGE percentage of LEO's are not shooters. Firearms are part of their job, but no more than a computer, or ticket book. I don't think it is a malice issue on the part of the LEO as much as a lack of knowledge.
 
I agree with Kevin, but ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, particularly when you're the one enforcing it !!

I should have added that the foot note at the end of the show confirmed that the guy's ammunition was perfectly legal.

Therefore, the seizure was illegal, at least that's the way I see it.
 
I agree with Imaginos .... a clear violation of his rights. Sad but true...unknowledgeable law enforcement officers "puttin' on a show"..... sigh....I would have advised them that I was legal and that I needed my ammunition...if they still took them, I would have consulted an attorney who specialized in civil rights. The way it played out, they, in effect, disarmed a citizen who was legally armed for his self protection and they would have been liable if he had been assaulted. He probably wasn't assaulted and therefore his case may not interest an attorney which is just in it for the money - although with it being taped and aired, they do have a solid case....his rights were violated and he does deserve justice. He may have been satisfied with the officers being suspended, reprimanded or terminated and if their "boss" was an honorable man, thats exactly what would have happened. Oh, and they would return his ammunition with a sincere apology.

And yet another good reason to keep a spare mag of FMJ, which in this case, they "might" have left with him since it wasn't what THEY considered illegal.
 
"Oh, 147 grain bullets are illegal - wait a second, I have a nail file here, give me a minute and I'll have 'em down to 146 grains and I can be on my way".

:evil:
 
In the follow-up notes to that episode it did say something about "The ammunition confiscated was later returned after being determined not to be illegal." The initial response by the Officer did bother me in many ways. Totally ignorant Officer and borderline harassment IMO, plus unjust confiscation of that poor guy's ammunition.
 
Wow! What a couple of complete idiots!
I'd get their badge number and also make them escort me home in case I'm attacked before I can re-arm. Actually in that case they'd probably ransack his house as well.

Statement/question (second cop) - "and these are hollow points, they only have one purpose you know, why would you want to have hollow points."
The exact same reason you do, to stop someone that wants to kill me.
 
I agree with Kevin, but ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, particularly when you're the one enforcing it !!
You'd think ...

One of the protections that police officers and departments have is limited legal immunity while in the course of their duties. In some ways, this is a very good thing as it protects good police from getting in trouble for minor mistakes. On the other hand, in cases like this it causes problems as it limits the recourse that a victim of police abuse might have and reduces the incentive for police to learn the laws they're trying to enforce.

The police lied about the legality of his ammunition, confiscated property that they had no legal reason to confiscate, and to top it all off they used their position of authority to attempt to stop the driver from legally carrying his handgun in the future. My guess is that they were not punished for any of these actions, and I'd be astounded if the driver got so much as an apology when he drove over to pick up his ammo. He was lucky that he got his ammo back at all.

On one occasion I was pulled over for speeding and got to deal with an officer who was ignorant of the law. The original officer told me to place my pistol on the floor by the passenger seat, had me sit on the rear bumper and called two additional officers for backup. The youngest of the two responding officers took a look at my gun and then came over to gave me flak for carrying a 1911 cocked and locked. He asked if I thought I was in compliance with Indiana state law in carrying a handgun that way, the obvious implication being that he thought it must be against the law. I ended up with nothing more than a speeding ticket that night, but I firmly believe that if some TV show had their cameras over the shoulders of those officers, I probably would've been lucky to get away with being arrested and turned loose later.
 
In my experience the only people who know less about gun laws than FFLs and Post Office employees are cops in big cities. I would not allow any officer to simply confiscate my property. I would have demanded that a supervisor be summoned and if any of them actually took my ammo (or anything else) I would start by filing formal complaints against all involved and end by hiring a lawyer for the lawsuit to follow.
 
I would not allow any officer to simply confiscate my property.
Its not as if it is optional. they are hoping you will object so they have some justification to womp on you.
I would have demanded that a supervisor be summoned and if any of them actually took my ammo (or anything else)
And they might well call for a sgt after they bust you for obstructing, resisting, or some other bogus charge.
I would start by filing formal complaints against all involved and end by hiring a lawyer for the lawsuit to follow.
Which would get you nothing, even if you could find a lawyer to take the case. By the time the reports get written and rewritten and edited, you will be a mafia crime boss or a major gun runner.
 
cordex,

curious to know how he knew you were carrying. did you tell him? did he ask?

I haven't been pulled over for speeding since I was in college (SEVERAL TIMES, 10-14 years ago) and I had a handgun permit all that time and not once did they ask about a weapon.
 
Aaand this is exactly why I won't volunteer any CCW info while I am in MA, despite my MA non-resident permit, unless I absolutely have to, such as this fellow had to.
 
Cops

Why do they think they are the only people 'qualified' to possess guns?

Like the Glock Fotay guy, "I'm the only person qualified to handle this firearm.....BOOM,,,,,ouch, I shot my foot.....

They simply think intimidation will prevail. It's a tool they need, but violating peoples rights just doesn't sit well with me. They should know more about gun rights and regs, not less than the average CCW holder. It is a part of their job, or should be, to know this stuff.

jeepmor
 
Noone can be an expert in all things, however I do kinda expect cops to know a lot about *either* guns or the the law. If an individual is lacking in both areas one kinda has to wonder what they actually do know about.
 
To be 100% honest...I would have done exactly what I was told. Having dealt first hand with police corruption, I know how scary life can get once you take a stand against an officer or department...even when you are on the inside!
-Mike
 
Actually, I wouldn't answer any questions beyond identifying myself and producing my concealed weapon license. "Officers, my attorney tells me all the information you need is right there" while pointing to my licenses.

I certainly wouldn't resist the theft of my ammo, but my inclination would have been to dial 911 ASAP and report an armed robbery by two uniformed members of the highway patrol.
 
curious to know how he knew you were carrying. did you tell him? did he ask?
One of the first things he asked as he walked up was "Are you carrying any drugs or weapons?"
I haven't been pulled over for speeding since I was in college (SEVERAL TIMES, 10-14 years ago) and I had a handgun permit all that time and not once did they ask about a weapon.
I've been pulled over a couple of times while carrying and been in the car when a friend was pulled over while we were both carrying. I haven't always been asked, but prior to that time in the instances that the officer did ask and learned I had a gun on me, the response was a variant of "You leave your gun on your hip and I'll leave mine alone too," which always struck me as fair.
 
A VERY LARGE percentage of LEO's are not shooters. Firearms are part of their job, but no more than a computer, or ticket book. I don't think it is a malice issue on the part of the LEO as much as a lack of knowledge.

I had a conversation with a co-worker the other night. He informed me that he worked as a law enforcement officer for several years shortly after graduating from college. He said he was in it for about 3 years. He then proceeded to tell me that he sold his service pistol when his first daughter was born. Said the guy got a great deal because it only had about 50 rounds through it!!! THREE YEARS AS A LEO, AND HE FIRED 50 ROUNDS???? VERY SCARY!!
 
Unless you live in Texas or maybe Arizona, the rule of thumb appears to be that even if you have a CCW permit, you had better not let a cop catch you carrying a firearm.

You may not like it but there it is.

Cops should begin to recognize CCW permit holders as their best friend, not one of their worst enemies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top