Trump's new nominee for Supreme Court Justice is Neil Gorsuch

Status
Not open for further replies.
He's a great pick because no one has dirt on him. The media cant savagely attack him like they have everyone else.


His mother left as the head of the EPA? under controversy.

The left has already said he is bad for the environment under that pretense.
 
His mother left as the head of the EPA? under controversy.

The left has already said he is bad for the environment under that pretense.

What do the alleged actions of a parent some 35 years ago in a non-judiciary role have to do with him?
 
yeah, that's pretty weak sauce. His being confirmed unanimously to his current post is what is relevant.

The fact that originalist/constructionalist/textualist are dirty words to those opposing his apointment is also relevant.

TCB
 
His mother left as the head of the EPA? under controversy.

The left has already said he is bad for the environment under that pretense.
Thats like saying Obama is promiscuous because his mother was a woman of loose morals. The sins of the parent simply dont apply to a child.
 
What do the alleged actions of a parent some 35 years ago in a non-judiciary role have to do with him?

Absolutely nothing. But that didn't stop them from saying it on live TV.



Thats like saying Obama is promiscuous because his mother was a woman of loose morals. The sins of the parent simply dont apply to a child.

It doesn't even make that much sense.
 
But they aren't, so your imposition is mostly hypothetical. However, a full third of Americans cannot access concealed carry or the most effective weaponry, right now.

Also, fwiw, both the colonies & early US were supportive of religious blocs between states so long as citizens weren't forced to join or support a side and didn't feud, which why the 1st amendment stipulates the US Congress, and not the states. But obviously that is no longer how we operate today since states have become blurred & weakened.

TCB
Well, hypothetical only since 2015. And that is certainly on a knife's edge. I don't really understand what you are saying with regard to religion - the right of the federal government to ensure the rights (and constraints) enumerated in the BOR is settled law, long ago..
 
He's about as clean as they come, but the haters will dig & dig and when they can't find anything that will destroy him, they will lie to destroy him.
 
Did you see the protesters out there with the fill-in-the-blank signs? Wouldn't have mattered who was nominated.
Paid protesters. I have wondered how I can get in on that. Seems like an easy way to get some laughs, and put some money in my pocket to put towards some new firearms. And have all the guns engraved with "Paid for by George Soros".....liberal.

I really do hope he turns out to be a good Justice. Hopefully we get at least one or two more good ones on there. The Republicans (really hate that word) should use every option at there disposal to ensure they get the youngest, purely constitutionalist Justices they can, and not pussyfoot around and worry about hurting the Dem's feelings. We NEED a SCOTUS that can keep both the Dems and the Repubs in check without legislating from the bench.

Now bring on Term Limits!
 
I at least hope that by now, the pro-2A peeps have finally figured out which political party supports their cause.

Unlike all the blue collar union types who followed the party bosses edict and voted Obummer into office, believing his promise that he wasn't going to take away anyone's guns. The only reason that he didn't take away everyone's guns was because the Republican congress stonewalled him hard core. And they paid a big political price for that, as the media blasts them as the do nothing obstructionist party. But IMHO, that's exactly what was needed to suppress the potential landslide.

Now the shoe is on the other foot, but they don't have the votes.
 
Sorry - just want to be clear that my snarkiness was directed at those raising the non-issue - not you for having brought it to our attention :)


thanks, no problem :thumbup:

I did initially read it that way but quickly realized it was more of rhetorical question by you and not directed at me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top