Tunnel Rat Weapon

Status
Not open for further replies.

kBob

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Messages
6,459
Location
North Central Florida
During the VN war, in the summer of 1969 the US Army tested a modified S&W M29 revolver for use by troopers entering tunnels to search out enemy, equipment, and intel materials.

This revolver had the barrel bobbed almost right at the frame and the chambers in the cylinder bored through to allow the use of a cylinder length metal cased cartridge.

The cartridge launched 15 metal pellets at about 700 FPS that could each fully penetrate a 3/4 inch plywood board at 15 feet. During the test only one enemy was killed actually in a tunnel, however several were killed at close range elsewhere. Kills or disables were made up to 20 feet away with this gun.

The ammunition used a captive piston design so the weapons sound signature was reported as being much like the suppressed .22 pistol in use by the Ranger Companies up to that of a toy cap pistol of the time.

There were issues with the ammunition misfiring, but the concept of the sealed piston and quiet nature of the ammunition was proven.

Made me do some -kBob thinking.

First, does anyone around here have hands on experience or atleast info about the system. I seem to recall that either Guns & Ammo or Shooting TImes had an article about them I believe in the 1970s.

Second, although the ammunition might be comparitavely expensive to traditional ammunition, might not this design be an excellent candidate for use in the various .410 revolvers? The reduction of noise levels to the firer, especially when used inside a vehicle or bedroom would be a tremendous benefit to the firer.

Thought? Comments?

-kBob
 
I did see them in my Intel duty in 1970. They were held by company grade officers and handed out for tunnel clearing. Being a gun buff even then I did look them over pretty well but never fired one or saw one used. The cartridges were individually accounted for somehow to experimental command back home. The telescopic folded case was too weird to appeal to my tastes and most guys used a 1911A1 for tunnel entrance. What was needed was a better flashlight system :(
 
460shooter,

Thanks for your response.

As to the pictures you posted.....no...but those are interesting. I would like to know more about those guns though. I am guessing that the thing mounted on the top strap is a light of some sort. The head gear looks like another Saturday night out in the river swamp following the dogs to a treed 'coon. I will say it looks like an excellent way to be shot in the head when the 'coons are armed.

The .44 M29s used in the field test and in the AAI contract test stateside had stub barrels, seemingly with smooth bores based on the cut away drawings and both cylinder and choke bores were tested with cylinder winning. No suppressor was needed as the ammo was what was silent.

Looks like Han Solo with no shirt there! The boom mike and eye phone look like a pretty good idea.....makes the rat feel less alone in the tunnel I bet.

Would be interested to know more about that whole system and the revolver it is based around.

Is this what you saw and handled?

-kBob
 
Here is what I saw in 1970, the other silence revolver above actually might be a later experiment as the velocity and reliablity of this system of telescopic cases was dismal apparently
52135.jpg
 
How did the ammo work, compressed air, spring, gun powder??

Still the attached article shows 120dB, so not really quiet.
 
What was needed was a better flashlight system :(

LOL. No kidding! I hate those flashlights.

whenI'm teaching the Vietnam Wr to high school kids, I have one powerpoint slide with a diagram of a typical tunnel complex and a photo of a GI in a tunnel with a 1911 in one hand and a craptastic flashlight in the other. Every time that picture comes up, I complain about those lights.
 
Standard small primer and gun powder.

There were sometimes a few sparks according to field reports.

The field reports had glowing praises for the effective ness of the shot cartridges inside 25 feet where it was claimed they were more effective stoppers than the GI FMJ .38 Special and .45 ACP.

On the other hand bare ballistic gel penetration at 15 feet was less than five inches......hmmm...... but you did make 15 holes with a centered shot at that range.

Pellets were smaller than a BB (.177) at only .147 inch diameter.

-kBob
 
Gordon,

Thanks for the nice picture of second model gun and ammo. It appears AAI fixed the cartridge reliability. It seems to have been piss poor QC in the first place more than anything else.

Since S&W made the N frame M28 with a lanyard loop for LE contracts (Just like the one on the 1917's) I have to wonder why AAI had to come up with their own design. I can see the need for a dummy cord on a gun used for crawling in tunnels. The field requests mention wanting to have the gun on a neck loop when in use so both hands could be free.

Some folks fight the idea of a dummy cord. I have used them. Tried to get some "Kaydets" to "Dummy up" some M-16A1s one night a bit west and inland of Pensacola FL in a well used wooded/swampy area. They refused. Much later that night I snuck into their bivie area and I got five before the cadre made me stop. Almost woke one that was smart enough to loop up his rifle sling like he was going into a good prone but with a very loose sling. Gave him an atta boy the next evening during debrief. Interestingly he was one of the few that had no trouble killing his live chicken they got for rations that evening.....and he was praying to be branched Finance.

-kBob
 
Standard small primer and gun powder.

There were sometimes a few sparks according to field reports.

The field reports had glowing praises for the effective ness of the shot cartridges inside 25 feet where it was claimed they were more effective stoppers than the GI FMJ .38 Special and .45 ACP.

On the other hand bare ballistic gel penetration at 15 feet was less than five inches......hmmm...... but you did make 15 holes with a centered shot at that range.

Pellets were smaller than a BB (.177) at only .147 inch diameter.

-kBob
Yeah funny about thos "glowing field reports" from officers currying to career promotions from connected corps. :( all I remember is the actual intended users saying no thanks after they tried a few rounds into a melon or something, that is the ones that went off properly. The cartridge was folded metal that telescoped out into the barrel and retracted - supposedly , back into cylinder, there was no actual blast path for the propellent but a supposed slowed release of gasses around the sabot. VERY weird and high tech for the day, but not something you would want to bet your life on, now a 19911a1.............. :)
 
Only tunnel rat I ever knew said he had a knife and a 1911.
Same here. 1911 and a flashlight. He was about 5' tall and described the tunnels deminsions at about 3'x3' max. Can't imagine needing shot or a special purpose handgun for crawling around these tight networks. 1911 seems fit. And thanks for your service veterans.
 
I talked to a guy who did it and he said he used a 1911 and a flashlight. He said that the tunnels were common in Vietnam and had been used by the Vietnamese for a long time, and that it was a rough time on their turf.
 
The way I remembered someone crawling down into some ((( @#$%#@$ ))) VC or NVA Tunnel Complex to Kill or Capture the Bad Guys. Was that Crazy Guy got to pick just what weapons He was going to be carrying, and rightfully so IMHO. And also I was an Infantry Soldier and we found a lot of Tunnels and Tunnel Complexes in our AO in Viet Nam. And we never had any weapons issued to us for a Tunnel Rat to carry while crawling around down in some darn dark muddy scarcely tunnel that I ever remember. And one other thing we never had a anyone that was an ((( Assigned Tunnel Rat ))) with any of the Infantry Units that I was assigned to. It was kind of a spur of the moment strictly volunteer deal. And I know for a fact, I never told any of my guys that they ever had to go down into one of thoes scary Tunnels. One of us would just step up and do it, for it had to be done. And all of us crawled thoes nasty tunnels at one time or another. When We felt it was Our Turn. It was just part of Our Job. I miss thoes Guys more than I can ever began to tell you. And I am very proud to have been one of them, even tho it has been a long time ago.
ken
 
There were pictures of conventional revolvers with silencers on another board recently, in spite of the usual expert opinions that a revolver cannot be usefully suppressed due to the cylinder gap. They look a lot like vanilla left over Victory models to me.
 
I beg to differ with the common opinion a revolver cannot be suppressed ! Back in the 50s I actually saw them used ( by cops off duty who had taken them from mobsters :) ) and they indeed cut a LOT of the muzzle blast out. Sure they didn't sound like Hollyweird, but they could be fired without hurting your ears. The cylinder gap made more noise than a weapon without it but still they cut a heck of a lot of noise on the .38 specials I saw used.
 
Wish I had a picture, but the strangest thing I saw an M2 carbine chopped on both ends. No sights, and a thirty round mag. It seemed a bit bulky, but the fellow that had It said it worked pretty well.
 
Tim Mullins - who was there - called it the Advisor's Gun. Take an M2 carbine, cut the barrel to 10.5" to clear the foreend just enough to reset the front sight, and put it into an M1A1 Paratrooper stock. Handy. An American alternative to the also popular "Swedish K" Carl Gustav M45 SMG.
"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top