Garandimal
member
Sure, Spitzer (pointed) bullets will have a useful ballistic advantage over round nosed bullets beyond close range ( < 150 yards ).
But, when comparing Spitzer bullets (of same or similar cartridges) - marginally higher Ballistic Coefficients provide marginal improvements at medium hunting ranges, as marginal higher Muzzle Velocities do.
So, in the field, what makes a bullet... "Better"?
If increased bullet weight increases BC, but decreases Muzzle Velocity, where does that advantage become apparent? And where is it a detriment?
If Two different cartridges can push similar bullets with similar Sectional Densities, but different weights and at different velocities - Where does "Twist Rate" overcome increased muzzle velocity and bullet weight to provide better performance at hunting ranges?
GR
But, when comparing Spitzer bullets (of same or similar cartridges) - marginally higher Ballistic Coefficients provide marginal improvements at medium hunting ranges, as marginal higher Muzzle Velocities do.
So, in the field, what makes a bullet... "Better"?
If increased bullet weight increases BC, but decreases Muzzle Velocity, where does that advantage become apparent? And where is it a detriment?
If Two different cartridges can push similar bullets with similar Sectional Densities, but different weights and at different velocities - Where does "Twist Rate" overcome increased muzzle velocity and bullet weight to provide better performance at hunting ranges?
GR
Last edited: