Not joining the debate again...but thought this might be pertinent info if some finds this thread while actually looking for information.
I pulled this from the web.
The 168s are "marginally" stabilized in my 1-9.5, and it shoots fine in my conditions. It put 4 shots into one double sized hole, and cracked a neck and had a shot 1" high.
The original bc was supposed to be .65 ish, I'm using a .600 to match trajectory with my start velocity of 2900fps. Even tho accuracy is good, I think Llamas right, poor conditions and it would probably wobble pretty good.
After these two boxes I'm dropping to the 150s, or yanking my tube and installing a 1-7 or 8.
I pulled this from the web.
The 168s are "marginally" stabilized in my 1-9.5, and it shoots fine in my conditions. It put 4 shots into one double sized hole, and cracked a neck and had a shot 1" high.
The original bc was supposed to be .65 ish, I'm using a .600 to match trajectory with my start velocity of 2900fps. Even tho accuracy is good, I think Llamas right, poor conditions and it would probably wobble pretty good.
After these two boxes I'm dropping to the 150s, or yanking my tube and installing a 1-7 or 8.
Last edited: