Blue68f100
Member
With the right powder you can get high velocities without getting into +P pressure loads. I was looking the other day and WSF was giving me over 1000 fps in a 185gr XTP. And i was 0.4gr below max.
what’s a standard +P velocity?
Yup. I've done it, too, using Sierra's JHC 240gr. and Blue Dot in .45AR using published data from Sierra. It's not a +P load at 900fps out of my 1917 S&W "Big Ugly." Sierra also lists "Universal Clays" for ".45ACP (Revolver)" and it's not a +P load, either. BUT those loads are with their bullets. And if you read the warnings - which I highly recommend - you will note Sierra sizes and cannelures their bullets very specifically for these types of applications so using their data with another maker's bullet is not safe or recommended. Oh, I don't doubt you'll get away with a few dozen or so and not blow a gun up... but it only takes one so I would say stick to the data Sierra puts out to the letter. Or, experiment. I'm pretty sure a modern Model 25 can take several dozen proofing loads before it lets loose. Pretty sure.Shear genius! How could anyone ever doubt it? Such an intellect is extraordinarily rare indeed! Maybe you can bottle and sell it?
Well, YOU know that and I know that but he didn't ask for "standard pressure/high velocity" he asked for "+P loads" specifically with "Universal Clays." The only reference I know of which lists "Universal Clays" and .45ACP revolver loads is Sierra and they aren't +P loads. I figure it's a peg-pounding exercise - make the square pegs fit the round holes - so why bother posting what's known to work if it doesn't fit the criteria?With the right powder you can get high velocities without getting into +P pressure loads. I was looking the other day and WSF was giving me over 1000 fps in a 185gr XTP. And i was 0.4gr below max.
Agreed! And from Sierra, of all sources! It's not the product's correct name."Univ,Clays" (above)
That is a prime example of an absolutely lousy data entry/naming.
Well, for starters, its badly mixing values. +P is more pressure, not necessarily higher velocity. A 300gr. Sierra JSP .4515" bullet (built for the .454Cassull and .45Colt "Ruger" hunting loads) stuffed into a .45AR sitting on 6gr. of Unique is going to be near a proofing load - +P++ - but the odds are pretty good it won't get much over 800fps. Then again, a .45AR with a Sierra 185gr. JHP over 8gr. of Unique is going to be moving close to 1100fps from a standard 1911A1 action/barrel without coming close to +P pressure. It just depends.https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/universal-clays-45-acp.909540/#post-12388376
Look at the cited reference in that post.
No..... +P produces higher velocity, for a higher pressure, for a given bullet. That's the whole point.Well, for starters, its badly mixing values. +P is more pressure, not necessarily higher velocity.
Don't be silly. P is not V. Mass matters. So does bullet shape, diameter, material... saying "+P is always faster" is just not true. End of story and my interest in helping jski "investigate" random internet ramblings. This is like trying to figure out if the drunk on the 3AM cross-town bus really can fly if he finds a tall-enough building. Worse, it's arguing over whether or not the named buildings are tall enough by an inch or two.No..... +P produces higher velocity, for a higher pressure, for a given bullet. That's the whole point.
Did you actually look at the chart correlating the two: (+P pressure --> higher velocity... same 230gr bullet?)
Nicely done.Don't be silly
But P produces V (at least the area under curve does)P is not V.
What part of "for a given bullet" was unclear?So does bullet shape, diameter, material.
End of story
Commercially-loaded? (which is where the nomenclature started as an indicator of increased performance),there are some +p loads that are slower than standard loads ...
You can get Ramshot and Accurate data from Hodgdon's website as well. And I did when first considering this. That's why I didn't think something around 900 FPS was "pushing" any limits. But that's why you ask!!!If you download the western powders ramshot manual there are many documented +p loads up to 1000 fps out of a full size 5". Forcing a powder to do something is like demanding oral sex from a shark. Probably not going to work out well.View attachment 1098279
I posted your load.You can get Ramshot and Accurate data from Hodgdon's website as well. And I did when first considering this. That's why I didn't think something around 900 FPS was "pushing" any limits. But that's why you ask!!!
I also called Smith and asked if the Model 25 could handle +P ammo: YES. And I also emailed Starline’s ballistician and asked if their AR brass could handle +P pressures: NO PROBLEM.
WHOA THERE! WHOA!I posted your load.
View attachment 1098339
Hunting load: Univ. Clays 7.0gr. 1100fps with a 240gr. JHC. And that's not a +P load. Standard pressure.
The Sierra loading app for iPhone. I took a screenshot of the 240gr JHC .45ACP (Revolver) loading data. In my opinion, if you are going to run the .45ACP faster than John Browning designed it, you might as well use a hunting bullet to do it. With .45AR and that same bullet I prefer Blue Dot. I get better case fill and the same velocities at lower pressures versus the other powders listed. According to Sierra. And I do follow the book recommendations including the use of R-P brass.WHOA THERE! WHOA!
That's way beyond what I was looking for! And I thought I was pushing limits unwisely at ~900 FPS?
Where did you get these loads from?
“All loads listed are safe for all the revolvers listed…”. OP has stated he is loading for a S&W Model 25. And, these are not +P loads. Sierra tested in a Freedom Arms Model 83. Where does Sierra state that the listed loads are 30kpsi? It’s not in the posted snip. And, yes! Always proceed with caution! Could a sworn that’s been stated a few times.Gentlemen, this thread started w/ discussion on how to safely get a 45ACP
going ~900fps using a 230gr bullet in a "+P" environment (22-23,000psi.)
Over the last several posts it has introduced loads approaching 29-30,000psi.
It would be beneficial to step back a reconsider both sources & methods....
and the fact we are now into apples vs oranges.
From the actual Sierra source of that data:
View attachment 1098386
Take care....
.
Sierra lists the S&W 1917 and Colt New Service - War One revolvers - along with the Taurus 445. Sierra doesn’t show pressure. They do list separately +P loading data. It could be claimed that proclaiming published data unsafe might be slanderous. Before claiming Sierra is publishing deceptive data which is excessive for revolvers they say are safe consider the ramifications of slandering such a large corporate entity. Be safe and remember no one is perfect. We’re using published data explicitly for the firearm being tested.I can tell you right now, calibrated QL shows 28,200psi for that 7.0gr Unique load previously posted.
Here to date/time, no one had listed the Sierra caveats that this was exclusively a high-strength revolver load.
The fine print/whole story matters... a lot. Other casual readers downstream might not be able to dig it out sifting through these threads.
...and the OP has already been given the magic ("Universal") formula for a 900-950fps/230gr well under +P/23,000psi
.