unspellable
Member
The story:
A man in West Des Moines, Iowa bought self-defense legal insurance from USCCA. Around eight months ago he shot an intruder in his house. Initially the police viewed it as a self-defense case. However, the question came up as to whether or not the intruder was armed. (Point still not resolved.) At this point it went to a hearing.
At the hearing, he was asked how he had representation and bond so quickly. The answer was his insurance coverage from USCCA. Where upon this was submitted as evidence of premeditation.
He has a friend who attends an open carry event that I also attend. This friend called Tom Miller, Iowa State AG who told him insurance coverage could be viewed as premeditation. Since then Miller has clammed up pending the outcome of this case. We may know more in the latter half of February.
Points of note: Iowa has no castle doctrine law. Tom Miller is a notably anti-gun Democrat.
Anybody else heard about this?
A man in West Des Moines, Iowa bought self-defense legal insurance from USCCA. Around eight months ago he shot an intruder in his house. Initially the police viewed it as a self-defense case. However, the question came up as to whether or not the intruder was armed. (Point still not resolved.) At this point it went to a hearing.
At the hearing, he was asked how he had representation and bond so quickly. The answer was his insurance coverage from USCCA. Where upon this was submitted as evidence of premeditation.
He has a friend who attends an open carry event that I also attend. This friend called Tom Miller, Iowa State AG who told him insurance coverage could be viewed as premeditation. Since then Miller has clammed up pending the outcome of this case. We may know more in the latter half of February.
Points of note: Iowa has no castle doctrine law. Tom Miller is a notably anti-gun Democrat.
Anybody else heard about this?