US counting on UN in Iraq

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jonesy9

member
Joined
Oct 23, 2003
Messages
405
Location
MA
Hey! wadda ya know? I guess Kofi liked all those millions we gave him last month for "renovations at the UN building". I hope he got a nice marble hot tub for his office with my tax dollars. I'd feel real good about that. :( :(


U.S. counting on U.N. for help in Iraq
WASHINGTON (AP) — As it weighs a major change in how to transfer political power to Iraqis, the Bush administration is relying ever more heavily on the United Nations to help clear the remaining high hurdles ahead.

It is an ironic turn of events for an administration that worked hard to keep the United Nations role in the background in the reconstruction of Iraq after the toppling of President Saddam Hussein. Now the United States is counting on the U.N.'s influence to help reach a solution to the ever-more complex political stalemate.

Any U.N. help may be slow in coming though. It could take at least a week to 10 days more for Secretary-General Kofi Annan to formulate all of his recommendations, according to one U.S. official's estimate. That would be a crucial delay with a July 1 self-imposed American deadline looming for the handover of power in Iraq.

Specifically, the Bush administration is hoping Annan will not only say that direct elections are impossible by July 1 — something he is expected to do — but also will endorse the idea of extending and expanding the U.S.-picked Iraqi Governing Council so it can take interim control of the country on July 1.

Annan was due to receive a firsthand report at the United Nations on Thursday from Lakhdar Brahimi, his special adviser who led a U.N. team to Iraq to assess prospects for a compromise approach to the political transition.

But until he consults with other governments, Annan is prepared only to say he does not think an election can be arranged by July 1. On other provisions of the U.S.-backed self-rule plan that has run into increased Iraqi opposition, Annan wants to hold talks first with some two-dozen additional governments.

President Bush, in an interview Wednesday with the Middle East Television Network, said, "We just must all work together to come up with an Iraqi solution as to how best to get a constitution and then direct elections."

Asked about a demand by Shiite leader Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Husseini al-Sistani for direct elections, he said, "I think the fact that he's willing to be involved is a very positive development. It shows people care about the future of Iraq."

Whatever the timetable and process for a return of sovereignty, Bush said he's generally heartened by the response of various elements of Iraqi society.

"It looks like there are some sharp elbows," he said. "But I am encouraged by what is taking place in Iraq. I appreciate so very much the fact that the Shiias speak out for freedom. I appreciate the fact that the Sunnis are questioning whether or not they have a role in the future of their country. I appreciate that the Kurds are active."

Under the emerging U.S. alternative, the U.S.-appointed Governing Council would be extended and expanded so it could take interim control in Baghdad on July 1 until an Iraqi legislature could be elected later, according to a senior U.S. official.

The Bush administration is eager to see whether Annan approves of the idea of endowing the Council with sovereignty because that would "give it legs," the official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.

The battered U.S. transition plan — agreed to last November — instead featured a complicated system of caucuses to choose an interim legislative assembly. Shiite clerics balked at that, fearing their majority sect would lose out. They instead demanded direct elections.

That led to the current stalemate, and the reason that the United States is leaning on the United Nations for help.

Secretary of State Colin Powell said again on Wednesday he was keeping an open mind until he heard from Annan, as did White House spokesman Scott McClellan — a deference to the United Nations that marks a broad philosophical shift within the Bush administration.

"We are waiting to see whether or not the U.N. has better ideas than the caucus system," Powell said on Cox Broadcasting. "If they do have better ideas we will certainly consider them."

State Department spokesman Richard Boucher was even more blunt Wednesday about the key role now played by the United Nations. "We haven't just made the trip to Iraq," Boucher said. "We haven't talked to all the Iraqi people."

Yet it's unclear whether the new U.S. alternative — even if it is endorsed by Annan — would really satisfy those in Iraq pressing for direct elections.

Some governing council members say there has not been a thorough discussion of alternatives in the event the U.S. caucus plan is junked. Other Iraqis and coalition officials have expressed doubts about turning over power to the Iraqi Governing Council, even if it has only a limited mandate to organize an election and a short time in power.

The problem, says Sunni Kurd member Mahmoud Othman, is that many Iraqis still feel the governing council "was imposed on the country by the Americans."
Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 
Catch 22

The UN is not going to send in a peacekeeping force until the situation is stabilized enough they can reasonably expect some level of safety for their people. That is never going to happen as long as US forces are present because Al Qaeda is using the place as a shooting gallery. Don't see a connection happening anytime soon.
 
It was inevitable. Politics and reality.

Reality: It lends "credibility" for the non-Americans
Politics: With all the leftist bed-wetters crying for UN involvement, it becomes a non-issue for presidential politics.

I do not agree with it, but I do not have all the info ;)
 
The head Shiite cleric ran off half cocked and demanded direction elections now. He got to talking and convinced his followers to demand, demonstrate, and demagogue "direction elections, now."

The US and others explained to him what reality was and that it wasn't gonna happen. So now the cleric is in a position where he can not be seen backing down to the US.

So whaddya do? Why you bring in the UN and good ol' Kofi. Let Kofi "investigate" and then come back with a "No way." So now the cleric has a fig leaf. Bush looks reasonable to the Iraqis and throws a bone to the UN blissninnies. The objective of the entire exercise was to get the Shiites off direct elections now.

One note: It wasn't too long ago that Kofi in one of his more lucid moments said Iraq ought to give up on democracy. It just wasn't possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top