First, let me say I do understand that one person may rate a gun different from another person, as obviously opinions vary. But I'm fairly new to understanding how the percentage relates to actual gun condition. And I'm more interested in revolvers, but I don't know if there is any difference or not in rating revos vs. semis. So lets ask specifically:
If a gun has never been fired, but has lets say a slight cylinder ring, or very minor wearing just from handling, what would the gun rate assuming everything else is superb? 95 or 98?
If a gun has been fired very limited (approx 100 or so rounds) and has no wear outside of normal spots (like cylinder ring/slide rails), and is in otherwise great shape, what do you think it would be? 90+?
Again, I know this is a highly opinion based topic, but since I don't know too much about ratings I would greatly appreciate your opinions . Especially paying attention to my two "examples"......and/or if you have something else you'd like to add that would be helpful I'd be greatful as I'm trying to make a decision about something.
If a gun has never been fired, but has lets say a slight cylinder ring, or very minor wearing just from handling, what would the gun rate assuming everything else is superb? 95 or 98?
If a gun has been fired very limited (approx 100 or so rounds) and has no wear outside of normal spots (like cylinder ring/slide rails), and is in otherwise great shape, what do you think it would be? 90+?
Again, I know this is a highly opinion based topic, but since I don't know too much about ratings I would greatly appreciate your opinions . Especially paying attention to my two "examples"......and/or if you have something else you'd like to add that would be helpful I'd be greatful as I'm trying to make a decision about something.