chaim
Member
There are several guns on my list to consider for my next gun. One catagory I was considering was a full-sized service pistol in .45ACP or .40S&W. The top choices in that catagory for me was a Taurus PT945 or a Ruger KP345 (with the Ruger being slightly in the lead).
However, I recently came across a good deal on a used S&W 4043. It wasn't really on my list, but it is a full-sized .40S&W, it is alloy (lightweight like the other 2) and thus possibly carriable (when out of state), I've long wanted a S&W auto, it has night sights (great feature for a defensive gun), and all at a bit better than $100 less than either the Ruger or Taurus. Also, it is DAO which is a plus for these guns. I'm a fan of 1911s and thus feel a safety should be frame mounted, up should be safe and down fire. I'm uncomfortable with the idea of switching to a S&W style slide mounted decocker that works in the opposite direction (up is fire, down safe)- I'm afraid that in a high stress defensive situation I may revert to what I'm used to and even if I just leave the gun decocked I may try to deactivate the safety by sweeping my thumb down and thus activating it when I most need the gun. So, on a S&W I'd prefer DAO.
The Ruger has the S&W style safety, and while the website shows it available with a decocker only, they don't seem to be available that way locally. Otherwise, it is a gun I've wanted since I first read about it and it feels great in my hand. Nice gun and to make it about ideal I can look into ordering it the way I want it with the decocker (though buying off the internet may not work due to MD's shell casing law- often manufacturers only ship guns with the fired casings to distributors that work within MD and NY, the two states with these laws).
The Taurus safety is the better option for safeties for me (works like a 1911 safety, plus further down will decock the gun). It feels good in the hand, but not as good as the Ruger. It also has a reputation for hammer bite in people with "fleshy" hands, and with no place to try it out locally (no one rents them) I'm not sure I want to test it by buying it not knowing if it will work with my (thick) hand.
So, I guess the question is, should I get this S&W or stick with my original idea of the Ruger or Taurus?
However, I recently came across a good deal on a used S&W 4043. It wasn't really on my list, but it is a full-sized .40S&W, it is alloy (lightweight like the other 2) and thus possibly carriable (when out of state), I've long wanted a S&W auto, it has night sights (great feature for a defensive gun), and all at a bit better than $100 less than either the Ruger or Taurus. Also, it is DAO which is a plus for these guns. I'm a fan of 1911s and thus feel a safety should be frame mounted, up should be safe and down fire. I'm uncomfortable with the idea of switching to a S&W style slide mounted decocker that works in the opposite direction (up is fire, down safe)- I'm afraid that in a high stress defensive situation I may revert to what I'm used to and even if I just leave the gun decocked I may try to deactivate the safety by sweeping my thumb down and thus activating it when I most need the gun. So, on a S&W I'd prefer DAO.
The Ruger has the S&W style safety, and while the website shows it available with a decocker only, they don't seem to be available that way locally. Otherwise, it is a gun I've wanted since I first read about it and it feels great in my hand. Nice gun and to make it about ideal I can look into ordering it the way I want it with the decocker (though buying off the internet may not work due to MD's shell casing law- often manufacturers only ship guns with the fired casings to distributors that work within MD and NY, the two states with these laws).
The Taurus safety is the better option for safeties for me (works like a 1911 safety, plus further down will decock the gun). It feels good in the hand, but not as good as the Ruger. It also has a reputation for hammer bite in people with "fleshy" hands, and with no place to try it out locally (no one rents them) I'm not sure I want to test it by buying it not knowing if it will work with my (thick) hand.
So, I guess the question is, should I get this S&W or stick with my original idea of the Ruger or Taurus?