mattw said:
I don't know what kind of PCP you guys smoke, but if just about everyone on the planet can produce a quality 1911 for around $700 in .45 ACP why can't USFA do the same in .22 LR? Are all the parts on that damn thing milled from barstock? Probably not.
Hmmm ... I guess we should go bang on Ed Brown's door, and Les Baer's, and then over at Wilson Combat, and demand that they lower the prices on their 1911's to $700.
While we're at it, what business does Colt have charging $1,300 for a Single Action Army? After all, Uberti is making them for just $400! The Colts must be ridiculously overpriced!
USFA makes incredibly high quality firearms. They are largely handcrafted, using top quality steel and other materials, and built right here in the high-labor-cost-capital-of-the-world. Just as Ed Brown and Les Baer and Wilson and others rightly charge a premium for the high quality of their 1911's, USFA commands a premium for its products.
Could USFA make a .22LR 1911 for $700? Probably. After all, they make Single Action Army replicas at price points ranging from $600 or so for the Rodeo (basic, unpolished matte finish) all the way up to $2,000+. I suspect USFA isn't trying to make a $700 .22 1911, however, because they don't see a market for it. There are plenty of .22 conversions, and even full .22 1911's (the Kimber Rimfire Target, for example), already available at that price point and even less. USFA is aiming this product at a small niche market -- one that wants a modern recreation of a hard-to-find gun built to the highest standards. It is probably a small market. I doubt USFA expects to sell many, and that's a part of why the price is so high. It costs a heck of a lot to design, tool up and build a gun, and when you don't expect to sell thousands of them you can't spread those costs around much.
If you don't like it, then don't buy it. That's your choice. If everybody else makes the same choice, USFA won't sell any of them. Be thankful you live in a country where you at least have that choice.