Quantcast

Varmint/Preditor Revolver

Discussion in 'Handguns: General Discussion' started by Istvan, May 18, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Legionnaire
    • Contributing Member

    Legionnaire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    7,123
    Location:
    Texas
  2. dvnv

    dvnv Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    136
    Istvan: Before you choose, read this if you haven't already:

    http://www.sixguns.com/tests/tt353.htm

    It isn't the most popular caliber for the large frame Freedom Arms and one can pick them up used for reasonable prices with some patience. It will get you to 150 yards and will hold up to "max" loads for a couple of lifetimes. fwiw, dvnv
     
  3. BSA1

    BSA1 member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    7,492
    Location:
    West of the Big Muddy, East of the Rockies and Nor
    32-20. 150 yards is quite a ways for a revolver but the 32-20 for me is a tack driver. With a custom made cylinder it would be a awesome performer.

    I just don't understand your comment about age and finances putting it on hold.
     
  4. jon86

    jon86 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    812
  5. Plastikosmd

    Plastikosmd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    782
    I thought about the 647. I am a smith guy but I have not been impressed with accuracy reviews
     
  6. R.W.Dale

    R.W.Dale Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    11,474
    Location:
    Northwest Arkansas

    One problem with this suggestion

    They are cataclysmicly LOUD!!!

    I had one for a spell, it was WAY WAY too loud for a walking gun and didn't really do anything 357 mag doesn't do with lighter bullets and half the blast and concussion

    My vote is for the lightweight wonder that is the s&w 386xl
     
  7. Istvan

    Istvan Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    9
    Hello everyone,

    Thanks again for all the replies and opinions(keep them coming if you have them!). Very interesting reading about the .357 Freedom Arms, dvnv. I didn’t realise they could be loaded to that level. I am starting to think, as most seem to agree, that the .357 is probably the closest I’m going to get, for what I am trying to achieve. I had given though to the .32-20 as well, as was suggested, but I think that out of a revolver, there’s nothing the .32-20 can do, that the .357 can’t do, and probably cheaper/easier to reload.
     
  8. Plastikosmd

    Plastikosmd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    782
    For safety, that would be Taffin loads in the 353 only. If u are not familiar with the FA guns, the 353 is a 5 shot built on the same frame as their 454. I would not run them in the standard FA 97 357, (smith/ruger included)
    I store my monster 357 loads in a red box, well marked for the 353 only.
     
  9. mackg

    mackg Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Messages:
    181
    Location:
    BC
    I just re-read an article by John Lachuck on the .44 Mag, and got a good chuckle.

    John is an ex ".44 Associates" member (guys who hot roded .44's before the Magnum). 10 years before Remington, he created his own ".44 Lancer" based on cut down .405 and .30-40 brass (@ 1.280).
    When the "Real Thing" reached stores, he skipped one week of lunch and bought a box.
    Upon shooting it to compare with his own, he "couldn't tell any difference.... and the terminal effect on rabbits, etc., appeared to be identical."

    So, can you hit a charging rabbit with a .44 ?:D
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2014
  10. Istvan

    Istvan Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    9
    Funny you should mention the .44, mackg. Some years ago I had a S&W 629 topped with a 4x scope. I had a surplus of Hornady 300gr ammo at the time, and decided to try an afternoon of groundhog hunting for giggles and grins. Unfortunately I only managed to get in 1 short for the afternoon, and even more unfortunate, I missed(about 140 yards). Aside from the excessive blast and recoil, it was more like an exercise in artillery shooting with the drop at that range. I never tried again lol.

    One of the main reasons I was originally looking for some sort of .24-.25 calibre wildcat chambering was the idea of a very flat shooting, fast stepping revolver, without the excessive recoil. I once thought the .357 maximum would have been ideal until I read about all of the issues it had. I am warming to the thought of the .353 Casull, which seems like it would just about duplicate the .357 maximum(if I'm reading correctly). I also still like the idea of Gary Reeder's chambering's in .240 Banshee, and .255 Banshee. The following is from Gary's website:
    "The 255 Banshee is a 22 Hornet case necked up to 25 caliber and puts a 75 grain bullet out at approximately 2100 FPS. The second Banshee caliber is the 240 Banshee which is a 22 Hornet case necked up to .243 and putting a 75 grain bullet out also at about 2100 FPS."

    I'm just not very familiar with these and unsure they would suite any better than a fast-stepping .357
     
  11. mackg

    mackg Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Messages:
    181
    Location:
    BC
    I remember buying a gun mag with an article "with loads specific to the Casull 353", and being very disappointed to find these same loads already printed in various manuals like the free Hodgdon booklet.

    I think you can just put that much lead and powder in a given space.

    An interesting caliber was/is the 360 Dan Wesson, somewhere between the Mag and the Max cases in size, which was chambered in a few D.W. standard big (44) frames, (not the max one). Starline had brass for a while.

    Since you're talking 20-something calibers at 2000 fps, have a look at:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.22_TCM (LEE wrote on their website that they made dies but only for one retailer)
    http://ezine.m1911.org/showthread.php?150-Rock-Island-22TCM-1911A2
    http://www.gunblast.com/RockIsland-22TCM.htm

    Not minute of skunk or revolver friendly, but dies should be reasonably priced.
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2014
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice