Virginia may put tracking chips in licenses

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jrob24

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Messages
434
Location
taxachusetts
http://www.aclu.org/Privacy/Privacy.cfm?ID=16661&c=39
http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,65243,00.html


RFID Driver's Licenses Debated


By Mark Baard | Also by this reporter Page 1 of 1

09:50 AM Oct. 06, 2004 PT


Some federal and state government officials want to make state driver's licenses harder to counterfeit or steal, by adding computer chips that emit a radio signal bearing a license holder's unique, personal information.

In Virginia, where several of the 9/11 hijackers obtained driver's licenses, state legislators Wednesday will hear testimony about how radio frequency identification, or RFID, tags may prevent identity fraud and help thwart terrorists using falsified documents to move about the country.

Privacy advocates will argue that the radio tags will also make it easy for the government to spy on its citizens and exacerbate identity theft, one of the problems the technology is meant to relieve.

Virginia is among the first states to explore the idea of creating a smart driver's license, which may eventually use any combination of RFID tags and biometric data, such as fingerprints or retinal scans.

"Nine of the 19 9/11 terrorists obtained their licenses illegally in Virginia, and that was quite an embarrassment," said Virginia General Assembly delegate Kathy Byron, chairwoman of a subcommittee looking into the use of so-called smart driver's licenses, which may include RFID technology.

The biometric data would make it harder for an individual to use a stolen or forged driver's license for identification. The RFID tags would make the licenses a "contact-less" technology, verifying IDs more efficiently, and making lines at security checkpoints move quicker.

Because information on RFID tags can be picked up from many feet away, licenses would not have to be put directly into a reader device. If there was any suspicion that a person was not who he claimed to be, ID checkers could take him aside for fingerprinting or a retinal scan.

States need to adopt technologies that can ensure a driver's license holder is who he says he is, said Byron.

Federal legislators may also require states to comply with uniform "smart card" standards, making state driver's licenses into national identification cards that could be read at any location throughout the country. The RFID chips on driver's licenses would at a minimum transmit all of the information on the front of a driver's license. They may also eventually transmit fingerprint and other uniquely identifiable information to reader devices.

But federal mandates for adding RFID chips to driver's licenses would create an impossible burden for states, which will have to shoulder the costs of generating new licenses, and installing reader devices in their motor vehicle offices, said a states' rights advocate.

"It could easily become yet another unfunded federal mandate, of which we already have $60 billion worth," said Cheye Calvo, director of the transportation committee at the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Drivers with E-ZPass tags on their windshields can already cruise through many highway toll booths without stopping, thanks to RFID technology.

RFID tags, which respond to signals sent out by special reader devices, have in some tests demonstrated broadcast ranges up to 30 feet. Reader devices have proven to possess similar "sensing" ranges. This is what has some privacy advocaters worried, including one testifying tomorrow before the Virginia legislators.

"The biggest problem is that these tags are remotely readable," said Christopher Calabrese, council for the American Civil Liberties Union's Technology and Liberty Program.

RFID tags inside driver's licenses will make it easy for government agents with readers to sweep large areas and identify protestors participating in a march, for example. Privacy advocates also fear that crooks sitting on street corners could remotely gather personal information from individual's wallets, such as their birth dates and home addresses -- the same information many bank employees use to verify account holders' identities.

Information from card readers could also be coupled with global positioning system data and relayed to satellites, helping the government form a comprehensive picture of the comings and goings of its citizens.

Driver's licenses with RFID tags may also become a tool that stalkers use to follow their victims, said Calabrese. "We're talking about a potential security nightmare."

But opponents of the use of RFID and other technologies in driver's licenses and state issued ID cards are conflating RFID's technological potential with its potential for abuse by government authorities, said Robert D. Atkinson, vice president at the Progressive Policy Institute.

"Putting a chip or biometric data on a driver's license doesn't change one iota the rules under which that information can be used," said Atkinson.

The Virginia legislators may balk at the use of RFID in driver's licenses, however, unless they can be proven to be immune from use by spies and identity thieves.

"I can't see us using RFID until we're comfortable we can without encroaching on individual privacy, and ensure it won't be used as a Big Brother technology by the government," said Joe May, chairman of the Virginia General Assembly's House Science and Technology Committee.
 
I wonder if you could disable the thing with a microwave oven, or an electromagnet or sumpthin'........
 
i wouldn't be carrying a license either. this stuff is getting absolutly ridiculous.

GM is pissing me off with their black box crap too. i won't buy a car if it has one. if all the manufacturers start doinging it i then buy used. and to my knowledge it had one. the previous owner must have removed it:evil:
 
WHOO HOOOO!!!!

FINALLY I have proof that it's not crazy to wear this thing....:D


Is RFID Technology Easy to Foil?
By Mark Baard
02:00 AM Nov. 18, 2003 PT

CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts -- You may need to read the following sentence twice: Aluminum foil hats will block the signals emitted by the radio tags that will replace bar-code labels on consumer goods.

That is, of course, if you place your tin-foil hat between the radio tag and the device trying to read its signal.

www.wired.com
 
Re this proposal, seemingly the latest example of bureaucratic foolishness, I wonder how come it is that these "officals" seem to so easily forget that while some of the 9/11 hijackers used phony drivers licenses, the fact that they were in the country at all clearly indicated that the INS had not been doing it's job.

Has it improved or changed at all, other than a changse of it's name?
 
I have a speedpass on my car, and an EZ pass from Mobil Exxon on my keychain.

Both use RFID technology.

I think I just might balk at an RFID license, though.
 
Click, Hummmmmmmmmmmmmm BRRRZAAAAPPPPP!! DING!!!

Gee officer, i dunno why it wont scan, maybe your machine is broke? whadya mean it looks like it's been in a microwave?
 
There is no fool proof method of identification, not for free people anyway.

Actually, finger prints are, but only for those who've been finger-printed. I wonder how long it will be before all kindergarteners are finger-printed on the first day of school "for the sake of the children," or some such leftist baloney.
 
My bad SW. Thanks for the correction. I knew that, I think I was just getting a bad feeling about the whole "biometric chip" bovine scat. Fingerprinting children is already a big deal. My sister had both of her sons printed recently............................I dunno..........:uhoh:
 
Who says fingerprints are foolproof?

Fingerprint identification is an "expert opinion" matter, not fact. The key is "points of comparison" between similar-appearing prints. Is 10 points a match? 6? 30? That is a matterof professional opinion. There really is no legal or scientific definition of a match.

Your own prints will vary depending on how they are taken, thus the standard method a good tech uses to put your prints on a card. Smear your finger with oil and smudge sideways and hard on a piece of glass, then comapre with one from a professionally done card. Lateral pressure changes the shape of the skin on the finger.

Untill someone prints a large section of the population every year for a lifetime, we won't know how much they vary over time.

And there would be a strong incentive for any "official" study to support the status quo.
 
The Boston Police Fingerprint Division was just disbanded. Their work was so sloppy that it will take years to fix.

Boston fingerprint responsibilities have been transferred to the Massachusetts State Police.


Don't forget that a lawyer in Washington State was accused of planting the Madrid, Spain train bombs based on lousy fingerprint work.


I place little faith in the so called 'forensic' sciences - fingerprints, DNA, firearms ballistics, etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top