It used to be <ahem> "recommended" that the hollow-based wadcutters be loaded backwards to form a low-velocity expanding hollow point. Don't know what the results would be in ballistic gel testing, though. Never did it myself.
Chopinbloc? Wanna try that?
Thanks for the photos, guys. Saved me the trouble of resurrecting an old box of W-W target wadcutters and posting pictures of them. They look just like the other flush-with-the-mouth cartridges. Great pix !
Terry, 230RN
About 40 years ago, there was an article in one of the gun magazines suggesting this.
The author placed a gas check on the nose of the bullet before seating.
He drove these at higher than target velocity and highly praised his own idea.
Always looking for something new to try, I worked up a load that pretty much duplicated his out of my Blackhawk.
In close, they worked fine but wouldn't group well beyond about 20 yards.
I suspected that it was a factor of the center of mass of the bullet being so far aft, that it lost stability.
Other bright and shiny things grabbed my attention and I didn't return to backwards loaded HBWC loads for many years.
A couple of years ago, there was an article in another gunzine where the author seated a "T" sized shot in the open gap of the backward hollow base bullet.
He claims that the stability problem has been corrected and that the now hollow bullets still upset dramatically.
(I haven't tried this yet)
However, since I had a S&W M-15 rebarreled to 2" a couple of years ago, I've gone back to reversing the HBWCs again.
At belly gun range, they work really well, but normal wad cutters shoot more accurately for me so are more often carried when I'm in a "Dick Tracy" mood.
My usual EDC is a SIG 229 40 S&W full of Hydroshocks in a IWB holster.
The need for the HBWC 38 Special load really isn't there.
Steve