"Walmart Laws:" Compromise, incrementalism and RKBA

Status
Not open for further replies.
On the other hand, they just love Costco. Unionized, "healthcare for all," etc. I went to a shopping mall in Phoenix to pick up supplies for work. There is a Super Walmart on one side and a Costco on the other. Naturally we began talking and comparing the two. From where we entered the store on the south side, an observation was made that Costco was on the left and Walmart was on the right. We continued with other east-west cold war analogies. Walmart is bright and cheery while Costco is gray concrete dreary. Walmart has a large selection of goods in different sizes while Costco attempts to keep costs down by offering only a few brands in eerily industrial sizes. Etc, etc.
That might be a valid comparison if there was some sort of "Kirkland" store that competed directly with walmart. If you want to do that, you're going to have to go costco vs. sam's club. And in case you've never seen one, Sam's is just like costco - gray concrete floors, pallets stacked to the roof, and gigantic sized products.
 
I'm all for free market, basic eco. 101, however much of what is happening in America is controlled by wealthy corporations, I do not see this as good for this country, we continue to lose manufacturing plants/jobs, we outsource
everything possible.

The operative term there is "wealthy corporations in league with the government whose regulations and trade agreements PREVENT fair competition".

That's why libertarians can oppose Wal-Mart, I think.

Companies like that are completely in bed with local and higher-up government, the end result being that an entrepreneur that wishes to compete with them has to fight through a mountain of red tape and regulatory fees that they can't afford, that the "big guy's" legal teams and pet legislators can breeze through in seconds.

It's also the governments favored-nation trade agreements with China that allow for the importation of goods at prices far, far below what any stateside entrepreneur could produce them for in any reality.

So the "giant boot" that's keeping new hardworking entrepreneurs from rising up to challenge Wal-Mart's dominance is worn by giant corporations in league with the government, which is decidely lethal to a true free market.

What we have instead is a government-subsizied race to the third world bottom.
 
What we have instead is a government-subsidized race to the third world bottom.


Agreed, for those who wish to see a global America they must bring a certain
segment of our population down to third world wage level while I understand
many disagree on this it appears to be our direction.:(
 
Come on, guys, it's not about Wal-Mart. It's about advancing The Cause, socialism.

Wal-Mart is just a means to an end, increasing the power of government. Their complaints about Wal-mart are always addressed by increasing the scope and power of government via zoning, labor law, mandated health care, inter alia. Wal-Mart is just the "gun mount" for the cannon of socialism to capture more private power (like the cannon chess piece in xiangqi/Chinese Chess).:)
 
If you pass a bunch of tarriffs and make stores buy only American made goods, Wal-Mart would stll be at the top of the heap when it comes to discount stores. their business methods got them there, not their cheap imports.

If you want to bitch about cheap imports, don't complain to Wal-Mart, complain to your local Congressman. That is the guy who might have influence over trade tariffs. Wal-Mart is just taking advantage of the system as created by your government. If other stores are not smart enough to do it, that is their problem.
 
I would like to see Wal-Mart or another store try something. Pick a set of different goods. Get one version that made in China and one versoin that is made in America. Put the same markup over cost on each price. Clearly label the country of origin on each shelf. See which products are bought by consumers. Are people really willing to pay more for American made products?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top