Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Wanted: A Culture of Self-Defense

Discussion in 'Legal' started by xd9fan, Apr 18, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. xd9fan

    xd9fan Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,858
    Location:
    Under tyranny in Midwest
    Wanted: A Culture of Self-Defense
    By Michelle Malkin
    CNSNews.com Commentary
    April 18, 2007

    There's no polite way or time to say it: American colleges and universities have become coddle industries. Big Nanny administrators oversee speech codes, segregated dorms, politically correct academic departments and designated "safe spaces" to protect students selectively from hurtful (conservative) opinions -- while allowing mob rule for approved leftist positions (textbook case: Columbia University's anti-Minuteman Project protesters).

    Instead of teaching students to defend their beliefs, American educators shield them from vigorous intellectual debate. Instead of encouraging autonomy, our higher institutions of learning stoke passivity and conflict-avoidance.

    And as the erosion of intellectual self-defense goes, so goes the erosion of physical self-defense.

    Monday morning, as news was breaking about the carnage at Virginia Tech, a reader e-mailed me a news story from last January. State legislators in Virginia had attempted to pass a bill that would have eased handgun restrictions on college campuses. Opposed by outspoken, anti-gun activists and Virginia Tech administrators, that bill failed.

    Is it too early to ask: "What if?" What if that bill had passed? What if just one student in one of those classrooms had been in lawful possession of a concealed weapon for the purpose of self-defense?

    If it wasn't too early for Keystone Katie Couric to be jumping all over campus security yesterday for what they woulda/coulda/shoulda done in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, and if it isn't too early for The New York Times editorial board to be publishing its knee-jerk call for more gun control, it darned well isn't too early for me to raise questions about how the unrepentant anti-gun lobbying of college officials may have put students at risk.

    The back story: Virginia Tech had punished a student for bringing a handgun to class last spring-despite the fact that the student had a valid concealed handgun permit. The bill would have barred public universities from making "rules or regulations limiting or abridging the ability of a student who possesses a valid concealed handgun permit . . . from lawfully carrying a concealed handgun." After the proposal died in subcommittee, the school's governing board reiterated its ban on students or employees carrying guns and prohibiting visitors from bringing them into campus buildings.

    Late last summer, a shooting near campus prompted students to clamor again for loosening campus rules against armed self-defense. Virginia Tech officials turned up their noses. In response to student Bradford Wiles's campus newspaper op-ed piece in support of concealed carry on campus, Virginia Tech Associate Vice President Larry Hincker scoffed:

    "t is absolutely mind-boggling to see the opinions of Bradford Wiles. . . . The editors of this page must have printed this commentary if for no other reason than malicious compliance. Surely, they scratched their heads saying, 'I can't believe he really wants to say that.' Wiles tells us that he didn't feel safe with the hundreds of highly trained officers armed with high powered rifles encircling the building and protecting him. He even implies that he needed his sidearm to protect himself . . ."

    The nerve! Hincker continued: "The writer would have us believe that a university campus, with tens of thousands of young people, is safer with everyone packing heat. Imagine the continual fear of students in that scenario. We've seen that fear here, and we don't want to see it again. . . . Guns don't belong in classrooms. They never will. Virginia Tech has a very sound policy preventing same."

    Who's scratching his head now, Mr. Hincker?

    Some high-handed commentators insist it's premature or unseemly to examine the impact of school rules discouraging students from carrying arms on campus. Pundit Andrew Sullivan complained that it was "creepy" to highlight reader e-mails calling attention to Virginia Tech's restrictions on student self-defense -- even as the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence rushed to capitalize on the massacre to sign up new members and gather e-mail addresses for Million Mom March chapters.

    "We are outraged by the increase in gun violence in America, especially the recent shooting at Virginia Tech," reads the online petition. "Add your name to the growing list of people who are saying: 'Enough Is Enough!'"

    Enough is enough, indeed. Enough of intellectual disarmament. Enough of physical disarmament. You want a safer campus? It begins with renewing a culture of self-defense -- mind, spirit and body. It begins with two words: Fight back.
     
  2. iamkris

    iamkris Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,839
    Location:
    My own little slice of Purgatory
    Michelle Malkin for President!!
     
  3. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    At least Attorney General.
     
  4. 30 cal slob

    30 cal slob Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    2,092
    Location:
    Location, Location!
    I'M IN LOVE
     
  5. xenophon

    xenophon Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    153
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    Great article. I knew the VT administrators view would come back to bite them. Police and security on campus to protect the students? They can't be EVERYWHERE at once. It's time for the nation to realize self defense is the answer. Just like on 9/11 when the passengers of the hijacked plane "fought back", we cannot continue to deny people the MEANS to defend themselves.
     
  6. ZeSpectre

    ZeSpectre Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Location:
    Deep in the valley
    I don't always agree with Michelle Malkin, sometimes feeling that she's a little to impulsive for my taste. However this time I feel she hit the nail dead center on the head!

    I dream vividly of seeing personal responsibility make a comeback in this country.
     
  7. [FH]K96

    [FH]K96 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    Messages:
    107
    Location:
    CA
    I agree wholeheartedly.
     
  8. selector67

    selector67 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    276
    Location:
    TN.
    I agree as well, gun free zones may as well be called killing spree zones.:banghead:
     
  9. mpmarty

    mpmarty Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,163
    Location:
    So. Western Oregon
    I want a bumper sticker that says:

    Gun Free = Free Fire Zone
    or
    Gun Free = Killing Zone
     
  10. bearmgc

    bearmgc Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,057
    What if parents got fed up and students got fed up and their choice of colleges included being allowed to have their CCW in class and on campus? Money talks. The sale of handguns always goes up after a major situation like this, after serial rapes and murders. Me thinks more people will carry reardless of the rules. But more pressure on colleges for allowing CCW, will see the "straw dogs" drop and college policies change.
     
  11. xd9fan

    xd9fan Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,858
    Location:
    Under tyranny in Midwest
    I hope the parents are asking for Virginia Tech Associate Vice President Larry Hincker's job. He needs to quit....he has no idea how to protect the kids.
     
  12. AlaskaErik

    AlaskaErik Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    450
    Location:
    Arizona
    The liberals have gotten what they want...a nation of sheeple. Well, at least on college campuses. The people who would have stood up against this madman are all in the military. The liberal youth of today have no concept of taking personal responsibility for their own safety. No doubt this will become a case study in how so many people can get killed with virtually no one resisting. Coming from a military/LE background, I simply can't comprehend what happened. 32 innocent lives lost is a terrible tragedy, but the greater tragedy is that no one fought back.
     
  13. glockarmourer40517

    glockarmourer40517 member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    Messages:
    69
    did anyone remember MANY the sheeple who were in the rooms where the shooter came in , they said they "played dead" hoping he would move on..


    reminds me of those rare "fainting sheep" who fall over fake-dead when frightened.


    yes, its a culture of whimps, no balls. :scrutiny:

    more and more like Europe every day here in USA. makes me puke.
     
  14. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    The "policy" has been proven ineffective. :mad:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page