Washington,D.C. Gun Ownership to Go Through One Man

Status
Not open for further replies.

Duke Junior

member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
685
Location
Cherokee County,North Carolina
Washington Gun Ownership to Go Through One Man

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/01/washington/01guns.html?_r=2&ref=us&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

By WILL BARDENWERPER
Published: August 31, 2008

WASHINGTON — Residents here who buy a gun to keep legally at home, now that the Supreme Court has overturned the city’s ban on handguns, will find that a bureaucratic maze leads them to an unmarked door on Good Hope Road Southeast where Charles W. Sykes Jr. does business.

Mr. Sykes does not sell guns, but on Tuesday he is expected to become the only federally licensed dealer in Washington to serve as the transfer agent for the carefully controlled transactions that will put guns in the hands of district residents.

There are no gun stores here, and a resident who buys a gun elsewhere must have the weapon shipped to a licensed dealer in the district. Mr. Sykes’s permit will allow him to receive the weapon and, for a transaction fee of $125, he will ensure that the requisite paperwork is prepared for approval by federal and district officials before handing over the weapon to its new owner.

Mr. Sykes has been handling this kind of transaction since 1994 for security firms, police officers and the like. His enterprise, CS Exchange Limited and located in the southeast Washington neighborhood of Anacostia, is not listed in the telephone book, and he does not advertise. But his name is commonly known in local gun circles, and he can be found on the Internet.

Mr. Sykes said his firearms work was a sideline — he would not name his full-time employer — and he had no thoughts of selling guns.

“I don’t know of any firearms dealer in the greater metropolitan area that hasn’t been broken into,” he said. “I don’t want the headache of having to secure a stockpile of weapons.”

There may be a few other holders of federal firearms licenses in the city, but according to the police, he will soon be the only one to offer this service.

There was a surge of people contacting him after the Supreme Court’s ruling, but Mr. Sykes said some people had lost interest upon learning how long it was taking him to receive the necessary approval. As of Tuesday, however, if all goes according to plan, a resident of the District of Columbia who purchases a gun should expect to receive the weapon within three weeks of purchase.

Mr. Sykes relocated his business in February; the new location was certified by the federal firearms agency in July. He applied for an annual license from the District Police Department, and that is the license he should receive Tuesday, said Traci Hughes, a police spokeswoman.

At that point, prospective new gun owners will for the first time be able to obtain weapons from out of state and have them duly licensed in the district.

Mr. Sykes said that so far only about 10 district residents had approached him for the transfer of newly purchased weapons. Still, there are indications that business may pick up eventually.

Dale Metta, the manager of Atlantic Guns in nearby Silver Spring, Md., said he had received “lots of interest from D.C. residents, but the problem has been that Mr. Sykes was not yet ready for business.”

Mr. Metta said in the weeks after the Supreme Court’s ruling he received at least 10 visits a day from Washington residents interested in buying a gun.

Also, the District Police Department has provided 412 firearms applications to the public, Ms. Hughes said.

Mr. Sykes, meanwhile, is counseling patience. “You’ve waited for 33 years,” he said. “What is another month or two?”
 
I have a feeling most people living in DC will continue to do as usual, get a gun from a friend or relative (or steal it) and keep it at home.

It would be nice to make $125 for every firearm transfer.
 
$125 transfer fee? And he's the only one licensed to do it?

This would be considered a "artificial barrier" in civil rights language, if we were talking about any other civil right.
 
If laws were enforced properly, Sugarman at the VPC would have to do these transfers - or go to jail for lying on his FFL application.

Anyway, glad that there is at least one option for DC residents now. The transaction fee sounds stiff, but not outrageous when you consider how much everything else costs in DC and what I'm used to paying a local FFL for equivalent transfers.
 
what happened to the case based on Heller trying to register his 1911?
 
what happened to the case based on Heller trying to register his 1911?
I believe he was finally allowed the privilege of registering a revolver.

DC is still standing by the ban on semiautomatics.

Funny thing is, they could leave the situation as it is, with only one FFL for the entire city. He can charge whatever he wants and he can take his sweet time. As long as the possibility of registering and legally owning weapons exists at all, Fenty can claim he's complying with the ruling.

In effect, the procedure is a guarantee that most people simply won't go to the trouble and expense of legally acquiring guns, and although it's not a ban, it's just as effective.

We need court challenges to this. Otherwise, if the situation is allowed to stand, it could be construed as, "well, you've got the theoretical right to own a gun, but we're not going to make it easy." If that becomes precedent, we're back to a situation where the 2nd Amendment gets lip service, but can't be exercised with any effectiveness.

Tried getting a carry permit in Maryland? They exist, but they're so elusive that I doubt anyone on this board knows anyone in possession of one. Same idea.
 
How many handguns (i.e.: revolvers) is one person allowed in DC? Apparently C&R applicants are being told by the feds that they're limited to ONE in DC.
 
There are currently petitions filed in the courts arguing that Wash. DC's protocols/requirements for registration are "unnecessarily burdensome" and convoluted.

"Registration" for a permit requires two appointments: One for the applicant and a second for the firearm.

Firearm must be transferred to a Wash. DC dealer -- at a significant fee.

Application fees are steep -- in the $500 realm, per firearm.

Then there's the issue of classifying a 1911 semi-auto as a "machine gun" because it's potentially capable of being modified for full-auto and if you search hard there are high capacity mags available for a 1911. Gun classification restrictions won't be allowed to stand.

So, getting a permit in Wash. DC is "burdensome" and expensive, complicated and frought with bureaucratic obstacles.

Petitioners -- NRA for one -- are seeking judiciary declaration, injuctive relief and writ of mandamus with regard to the permit process and eligible firearms. -- That and inclusion under the 14th Amendment equal protection provisions.

Wash. DC stands to get its teat caught in the proverbial judicial wringer.
 
Yes, one registered.

Nothing with a "bottom feed" magazine .. in DC, that's a "machine gun".

Must be kept locked up, and unloaded, in your home.

No carry permits.

But somehow, people still getting shot on the streets of DC, go figure. I guess criminals just don't obey the rules. Bad, Bad criminals! :banghead:
 
Well if you are not selling guns, and the only way to profit is transaction fees, then that makes sense to a point, still high, but again, there is no gun sales to profit on.

Hopefully some competition finds it's way to DC soon!
 
"It's my understanding that this is a request and not law. Part of the decision made this clear."

71Commander,

The decision might have made that clear to "you and me", but remember this is the town where they asked to define "is".

The only time you can have your registered handgun, loaded and ready for action in your home is for "immediate" self defense. All other times it must be unloaded and locked away.

This thing is far from over ... we are several years and a couple $million in legal fees from there yet.
 
"Hopefully some competition finds it's way to DC soon!"

Romma,

Not likely any time soon. The DC city council has made it quite clear that they will not approve a business license for a gun store ... ever. They would also have to approve any new FFL applying for a business license in DC ... the term "snowballs chance in hell" comes to mind.
 
Not likely any time soon. The DC city council has made it quite clear that they will not approve a business license for a gun store ... ever. They would also have to approve any new FFL applying for a business license in DC ... the term "snowballs chance in hell" comes to mind.

isn't that a legalized monopoly?
 
I think all six could probably be compelled to deal with the public if they (the dealers) have the right class license.

Would be enforced (or not) by the ATF.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top