WC846 Powder question

Status
Not open for further replies.

Spartan299

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
35
Location
Blue Springs, Missouri
I've been hearing that you can substitute WC846 instead of BLC-2 in 5.56 and still use the same (BLC-2) loading data. Is that true? I have been loading 24.2 grains of BLC-2 in 5.56 military cases with a 62 grain bullet and had thought that if WC846 is a straight across substitute I might buy some more as it is cheaper than the Hodgdon powder. Any insight would be helpful and thanks in advance.
 
Wc846

I have used this in the past and started just like a new powder and very carefully worked up a load. I think I may have used H 335 data and worked up to a safe load.You need to be very careful because most is reclaimed pull down powder.You really don't know what you are dealing with.Upon checking my records,It was WC844 that I used. All of my warnings still apply as 846 & 844 are different burning rates.
 
Last edited:
I was under the impression, perhaps mistakenly, that H335 loading data was used for WC844. I agree that I will need to start on the low side with this new powder, but I was thinking that 24.2 grains was not too much. Perhaps I should back it down a bit more.
 
Very similar but surplus powders vary from lot to lot. What is said about WC846 and BL-C2 is that BL-C2 data can be used to work up loads with WC846. I've loaded surplus powders in .223, 30-06, and 50 BMG and some powders were slower and some faster with some being close to commercial powder. WC844 is similar to H335 and WC846 is similar to BL-C2.
 
rg1: That sounds correct to me, at least from what I've heard. Would you feel that a 24.2 grain charge would be too high a starting point or should I begin smaller?
 
Be careful not to confuse the data!

WC-844 = H335
WC-846 = BL-C(2)

BUT, the WC powders are not commercial powders and you CAN NOT use it as direct replacements for the Hodgdon powders. You can use the load data as a reference and you must start low and work up because every lot is different and sometimes very different. You must work up new load data for every lot because there is no lot to lot consistency.

Most reloaders who buy the none canister powders will buy in large lots (32+ lbs) so they don't have to work up new loads every time they open a new can. You can save a lot of money but it doesn't come without a price.
 
Question: Why the addition of calcium carbonate (CaCO3)?
I dont know, but Wikipedia has
Instability and stabilization-

Nitrocellulose deteriorates with time, yielding acidic byproducts. Those byproducts catalyze the further deterioration, increasing its rate. The released heat, in case of bulk storage of the powder, or too large blocks of solid propellant, can cause self-ignition of the material. Single-base nitrocellulose propellants are hygroscopic and most susceptible to degradation; double-base and triple-base propellants tend to deteriorate more slowly. To neutralize the decomposition products, which could otherwise cause corrosion of metals of the cartridges and gun barrels, calcium carbonate is added to some formulations.

To prevent buildup of the deterioration products, stabilizers are added. Diphenylamine is one of the most common stabilizers used. Nitrated analogs of diphenylamine formed in the process of stabilizing decomposing powder are sometimes used as stabilizers themselves.[18][19] The stabilizers are added in the amount of 0.5–2% of the total amount of the formulation; higher amounts tend to degrade its ballistic properties. The amount of the stabilizer is depleted with time. Propellants in storage should be periodically tested for the amount of stabilizer remaining, as its depletion may lead to auto-ignition of the propellant.
 
I found a 8 lb jug of WC 844 on a local want add for 150. A little high for a pull down powder but considering all things I thought it was pretty good.
 
I use 24.6 grains of wc846 in my 55grain plinking loads and loaded up a few 62grainers at the same charge
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top