So I was at the gunshow this past weekend and I see the most bubba'ed rifle I have ever laid eyes on. It is an AK with an underfolding stock, looked to be in ok condition, nothing amazing. There were two things that stood out: The woodwork on the handguards and the $1499 price tag.
As I gave a disgusted look to this weapon that had "KILL OR BEE KILLED" (not a typo on my part) carved into the handguard, I asked the guy at the table: "Why is this thing $1500?" He looked at me like I had just said his kid was ugly or something and told me that it cost that much because it was a "real rifle meant for real soldiers to use." I did not care at that point because he was obviously the stupidest dealer at the show or just wanted to be an ass hole and not answer my questions.
So what could possibly make an AK with ugly handguards worth $1500? It was not full auto, only two spots for the selector. It was used but looked to be in decent condition. I've seen under folders on gun broker for $700 or $800 and thought that was WAY too much, but $1500? How can he justify that?
As I gave a disgusted look to this weapon that had "KILL OR BEE KILLED" (not a typo on my part) carved into the handguard, I asked the guy at the table: "Why is this thing $1500?" He looked at me like I had just said his kid was ugly or something and told me that it cost that much because it was a "real rifle meant for real soldiers to use." I did not care at that point because he was obviously the stupidest dealer at the show or just wanted to be an ass hole and not answer my questions.
So what could possibly make an AK with ugly handguards worth $1500? It was not full auto, only two spots for the selector. It was used but looked to be in decent condition. I've seen under folders on gun broker for $700 or $800 and thought that was WAY too much, but $1500? How can he justify that?