What about bugging in for an option?

Status
Not open for further replies.

CAS700850

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Messages
1,304
Location
Central Ohio
I've been planning this thread for a couple of days, in honor of it being Post 1,000 for me.

With all of the talk, and even short stories, about bugging out, I must confess that I am wondering how realistic it is, or even how desirable it may be, to bug out. Granted, a nuclear explosion or natural disaster may make it essential. However, provided that your home is not in a positionm of imminent danger from the explosion/disaster/etc., doesn't "bugging in" almost make more sense than bugging out?

First, if you bug out, you need somewhere to go. I'm blessed with family/close friends at varying distances in different directions, so there are plenty of options. But, if the situation changed, or I wasn't so blessed, where am I bugging out to. For instance, my mother is about 110 miles away. A disaster that hits me may hit her, making "bugging out" to her home impossible.

Second, bugging out means having to choose what to take, and what to abandon. We see threads along this line all the time. Which gun to take on a Bug Out? If you stay home, you have them all, with the ammo, reloading components and equipment, the associated gear, etc. It also means abandonning everything you have spent your life working for, leaving it to the "kindness of strangers" te be there when you return. For that matter, you may return to an empty lot.

Third, as was evidenced in the short story

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=172494

being prepared to leave is difficult to maintain. Bugging in is much simpler, as storage of materials doens't have to take into account mobility. As long as I keep the cupboards full of foodstuffs, have a fire that I can cook over, and water, my family will eat a lot better than MRE's. And, trust me, we keep the cupboards stocked, water available, and materials for a fire are right at hand.

Fourth, for some of us, bugging out is simply not practical. I have a five year old and a three year old. My wife has a bad back that limits what she can carry, and for how long. It doesn't affect her daily life, but a bug out by foot would leave her walking without much of a pack. I'm sure many of you have similar issues that would making bugging out very difficult if not impossible.

So, what's say we start a new line of "what if's" and start thinking about how to better "bug in". It's not as much fun, or as exciting, as the thought of fleeing from a mushroom cloud. BUt, sitting on the porch with a full belly guarding the homefront with your neighbors may just be more realistic, for some of us at least.

By the way, thanks to all of you THR members. Lots of fun, thought provocation, and education in the 1,000 posts I've been here for.
 
IMHO, you are absolutely correct. One should always plan on bugging in if at all possible for all the reasons you list. It might be different if you had somewhere specific to go, but wandering around the countryside should be avoided at all costs, especially with a family in the midst of some sort of disaster.

I work about 40 miles from my home, in a city, and I commute every day on a train. I carry supplies in my backpack so I can stay the night in the city if necessary and/or hike back home, which is a worst case scenario (but it is one I've thought out and could do if necessary). This would be termed a "reverse bug-out" I guess :)

If I had to leave my home, my wife and I would probably plan on camping somewhere and load up the car with as much stuff as possible for an extended camping trip. If we had to bug out on foot, we'd be dead in the water since we have a four month old baby, and she can't quite pull her own weight yet :p
 
Hi Cas,

I have been reading the "bugging out" threads with a smile. I ain't going anywhere. I have food for 6 months, fresh water for 2, guns, ammo, and medical supplies for a lot longer. It would take a U-Hall to move what I would/may need.
No I will just stay. There will be enough nuts running around in circles, looking for food, water, and gas without adding one more. Besides once you all leave that is just more for those who don't.:neener: :neener: :neener: :neener:

Kevin
 
I am with you.

I think most people who get into prepardness start with the idea of bugging out. After awhile, after completing several bug out bags, people usually graduate to the idea of bugging in, if possible.

I have lots of food and water, plenty of ammo, and house that is probably far enough away from potential trouble. I don't plan on going anywhere.

With that said though, I still do maintain a bug out kit consisting of food, water, ammo, firearms, camping gear, and other essential survival gear. The plan is to stay, but if required to, we could be out the door in 15-20 minutes.

I.G.B.
 
Agreed. I've never understood the 'bugging out' concept, unless everything around you is in complete chaos with rubble and radioactive biohazardous material everywhere. In other words, your domicile is a complete writeoff. Short of that, I'd stay home and hunker down.
 
+1 CAS. I don't have family or friends nearby who would be in any more desirable position. Staying put means I have access to plenty of food, shelter, protection and I am on my own ground albeit a small lot in an upscale neighborhood. Bugging out just doesn't have much appeal - I71 & I70 are already at near gridlock with out panic (just imagine what the gridlock would be if I were trying to bugout and OSU was playing a home football game! /sarcasm off).
 
Agreed. Unless I knew that my town was going to be nuked, I'm much better off where I'm at.
Biker
 
staying or going really depends on whats happening. A Three Mile Island or worse event, and yes, even you will be bugging out. Here in Miami, we have a Nuclear plant, and if it malfunctions, I am outta here.
Other than that or a Cat 5 hurricane, wife and I pretty much plan on staying put.
 
we have a Nuclear plant, and if it malfunctions, I am outta here.

Do you have some potassium iodide pills? They're cheap insurance, especially if you're planning on being stranded on the freeway in the radioactive clouds instead of in your basement. (Not that any Western-designed nuclear plant is very likely to give you any radiation.. but bombs put out radioactive iodine too).
 
I think it is a given that staying home is preferred over bugging out IF you have that option.
However, the possibility that you might have to bug out is ALWAYS present and it doesn't matter where you live. NO ONE is immune. There is always the chance that some kind of disaster can strike right where you live and leaving the area is the only option. Since this option takes a lot more planning, skills, work, etc. This is the one that is more frequently discussed.
One big problem I see in a lot of posts on this board is that there are a significant number of people that think they are immune because of where they live. As a result they broke one of the biggest rules of the game: they put all their eggs in one basket because they can't envision the reality of having to bug out.
 
I'm sorry but we're having a moratorium on SHTF threads in order to get the forum back to it's primary mission which is firearms and self defense issues. Please read the sticky thread at the top of the page.

Jeff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top