Mr. Standfast
Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2015
- Messages
- 45
What country ever had gun laws that weren't at least in part crazy? But in this case ours wasn't. It was and is simply that "nothing in this act applies to an antique firearm owned as a curio or ornament". Where the craziness (and worse) came in was in what constituted an antique. Some regional police forces were prosecuting or demanding "voluntary" surrender for cartridge firearms which others wouldn't. People stood out and were acquitted, and the Home Office, our police ministry, asked one of their consultants to report on the situation. The result was their acceptance of his long list of cartridge antiques for which ammunition isn't normally available. That isn't law either - just a policy with which they have ordered police forces and prosecutors to comply.
They still get anybody who has shot or threatened anybody, which seems fair enough, and anybody with two brain cells to rub together must realise that it has brought thousands of guns into responsible ownership, instead of being passed from one schoolboy to another until something goes wrong. I've negotiated several chamberings onto the list myself, and the consultant was appointed to the Home Office's standing committee on firearms. It was a valuable increase in our influence on the system.
They still get anybody who has shot or threatened anybody, which seems fair enough, and anybody with two brain cells to rub together must realise that it has brought thousands of guns into responsible ownership, instead of being passed from one schoolboy to another until something goes wrong. I've negotiated several chamberings onto the list myself, and the consultant was appointed to the Home Office's standing committee on firearms. It was a valuable increase in our influence on the system.