What comes first....refinish or trigger work?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eightball

Member
Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
4,257
Location
Louisville, KY
Alright, so I have a 5" Kimber Tactical Custom II. This last winter, it was my "winter CCW" piece, just to try CCWing a 1911. It worked.

Anyhow, this summer, I have a couple of options for the thing, and I'm not sure what the "correct" order would be in which to complete them, as I don't know which would affect the other.

One option: My Kimber's an old external extractor model. It's not given me any problems like you hear about with the 4" and 3" models. Possibly, though, I might see what Kimber could do for me in regards to "swapping" top ends. That being said....it "ain't broke", and it's decently accurate, and I'm worried that it might wind up either A) costing some money or B) screwing up the accuracy to fix what (to me) isn't a problem. This is purely just me doing some musings.....as it "ain't broke" on my firearm.

The more relevant options, and the reasons for this thread: Refinishing and a trigger job. The trigger's got creep, and I want it fixed up, so a trigger job is in order (I'm thinking Clark Custom here, but am open to suggestions). From what I understand, Kimber parts work well for trigger work, so that could cut down on some of the cost (once again...the parts ain't broke....).

However, I'm also thinking of getting the pistol refinished. I bought it used, and there's some notable holster wear on it at the usual locations. The slide is some crazy hard metal, and won't take cold bluing (I've tried), so I'm thinking of possibly getting the gun refinished. I hear good things about the durability of Melonite, but cannot find any information/costs for the process. I also hear good things about Robar and NP3 coating. Another catch: my gun has an older two-tone look that I kinda like, and kind of want to keep; I don't want this thing to turn into another "all black" 1911. The frame is an aluminum alloy, so I don't know how that would affect possible options for a refinish job. If I went with melonite....can they "color" it so that it would keep the grey look of the frame, and make the slide that nifty black color? Does melonite, robar, or NP3 work well with an aluminum alloy, and can they futz with the color to keep the "two tone" bit?

And so....my plans for the pistol this summer are to get a trigger job, and possible refinishing. That being said.....which should come first? Do I get the trigger job done and "out of the way", and hope that a refinish wouldn't affect it? Should I get the refinish done first, just to be on the safe side? I cannot decide, and don't know which option makes the most sense to pursue first. Please help.

I'm open to suggestions on where to look for which processes (trigger job, melonite refinishing, robar refinish, NP3 refinish, other refinish).

And, just to get a sense of the "two tone" look I'm trying to keep (and an idea of some of the holster wear), pictures!
Note the wear on the extractor---similar wear is on the front of the slide:
img14651.jpg

Other side:
scaled.php

Indoor picture, you can see some of the wear on the frame's finish (though the slide is a .22 conversion):
scaled.php
 
It's painfully obvious: TRIGGER JOB!

Don't worry about the finish, you'll just wear it off again. If you elect to get hard chrome, then it behooves you to make sure you have all the metal work done (such as dehorning) prior to the refinish job. My gun shows 10x more wear AGAIN, and I'm not going to refinish it for a 3rd time. Besides, honest wear looks cool.

A good trigger helps you shoot better, sometimes a LOT better. If it's your carry gun, then being able to shoot better is far more important than having a pretty gun (until it wears again, and you'd be right back where you are now)

I'd request the hammer/sear/disconnector be returned to you (or take them out before shipping the gun) and have some EDM'd parts put into their place. These parts are NOT "mim'd" and will hold angle longer. You may consider buying your own set (Brownell's has a couple sets that are drop-in, ready to go) and you could save significant money doing that.

Leave your extractor alone, it works fine.
 
I'd request the hammer/sear/disconnector be returned to you (or take them out before shipping the gun) and have some EDM'd parts put into their place. These parts are NOT "mim'd" and will hold angle longer. You may consider buying your own set (Brownell's has a couple sets that are drop-in, ready to go) and you could save significant money doing that.
???????
What? Please explain. What are "EDM"ed parts, and what is "holding angle", and why would EDM work better than what's in it now? Also, how would getting new parts affect the Schwartzer (sp?) FPS that exists in Kimbers?
 
Mim'd means "metal injection molded."

This works fine for many parts, but do not hold up as well as quality EDM's parts over the long haul.

"EDM" means "Electrical Discharge Machining." This method cuts cleaner parts. The mating edges will last longer and allow for a crisper, cleaner trigger pull.

The hammer/sear/disconnector have nothing to do with the Kimber Schwartz safety. See the link:

http://www.sightm1911.com/lib/tech/Kimber_SII_FPB.htm
 
Internal work. Don't bother with refinishing until you've got over 50% bare metal. It's a CCW gun. It's gonna wear.

Even if you opt to do both, do any exterior work last. It's just like building a hot rod. Get the motor and tranny done, then the interior, paint and body work last.
 
No, refinishing later will not affect the internals. They will be removed completely, a bare slide and frame will be all that goes into the bluing tank.
 
Do the trigger like you want it. the wear looks ok,the spots your talking about are normal wear. The spot on the muzzle is from not holding the gun vertical with the hoster when holstering the gun, most people rub the muzzle while holstering because of the angle the holster rides and we don't want to use two hands too make sure it's straight up and down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top