Dumb question: Could a .50 cal gun maker just make their "Calif version" rifle select-fire; then any non-leo could get a class III fed license and buy one, and if they're sane, only shoot it in semi-auto mode? I know it's not a good answer by any means to the stupid ban, but this is just a hypothetical legal question.
And a point....it would be a very simple matter for Barrett to place in his sales contract to distributors an enforceable clause that makes them agree not to sell to any LEOA in Calif.
As for honoring warranty repairs to LEOAs for pre-ban guns sold - I'd think he has to do that or pay the cost of the lawsuits under a valid warranty - that's up to him - I'd be interested to know the actual answer to that, whether he will or not.
And a point....it would be a very simple matter for Barrett to place in his sales contract to distributors an enforceable clause that makes them agree not to sell to any LEOA in Calif.
As for honoring warranty repairs to LEOAs for pre-ban guns sold - I'd think he has to do that or pay the cost of the lawsuits under a valid warranty - that's up to him - I'd be interested to know the actual answer to that, whether he will or not.