what guns are sized "right" for their caliber?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kookla

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
Messages
1,115
Years ago I had both a Ruger single six and bearcat. The bearcat seemed just about perfect for the .22 lr, while the ss a tad over built. I've seen the same thing with other .22 rifles- some that seemed overbuilt for a .22lr and others that were, well, svelte I guess is a good word.

Any guns come to mind for you?
 
If they were built strictly to cartridge size, every .22 LR handgun would be Derringer size. They're sized for practical shooting: balance, sight plane, ease of handling, internal mechanisms and etc. And of course personal preference and marketing plans.

Some may be "overbuilt" for the cartridge, but properly built for the hands of some pre-approved customer base.
 
3 come to mind immediately for me...

My new Henry lever action 20" octagonal barrel seems sized and weighted just right for the caliber

My alloy frame, steel slide compact CZ75D PCR handles all variants of 9mm loads just right... Again- appears sized and weighted just right

The small Ruger SR-22 blowback design is a real surprise... It likewise handles the .22lr nicely
 
A gun is properly sized for the shooter and the intended use. For example, a carry gun in .38 special would ideally be small, while a target gun in the same caliber would be heavier with a longer barrel.

A .22 rifle for squirrel hunting would weigh about 6 pounds or so. A .22 for formal target shooting would weigh at least twice that much.
 
Desert Eagle chambered in 50AE. I can't imagne shooting a Seecamp chambered in 50AE.

Using that same logic, a BFR chambered in 45-70.
 
You can take any caliber and shoot it through progressively larger guns and it will feel fine, maybe overkill. But when you try to shrink them down it will reach a critical point where the thing just becomes unshootable for 90% of the population.

A Ruger .22 pistol is shootable by anyone. An LCP in 380 is shootable for many people, but not all. If you could chamber an LCP in 50AE, I doubt 99% of the people out there could handle it without breaking/spraining their wrist.
 
I bonded more with the Glock 30s, vs the 41. The 30s seems almost magical, apart from other Glocks which feel totally soulless to me.

The Ruger Superblackhawk 44 mag is perfect in my opinion also.
 
I bonded more with the Glock 30s, vs the 41. The 30s seems almost magical, apart from other Glocks which feel totally soulless to me.

The Ruger Superblackhawk 44 mag is perfect in my opinion also.
I thought you said redhawks revolver were 'soulless'? Now glocks, too? :)

I do like the 30S.. my favorite 45 carry gun, & is about the minimum for a 45acp. ..maybe not 'optimal', like the OP is calling for, but for carry, shootability, accuracy, & other factors, it is a nice balance.

But i put the redhawk 45acp/45 colt in there too.. about the perfect size, weight, barrel length, & sturdiness to handle anything you can load in those calibers.

I think i'd add the glock 19 as about the most perfect 9mm.

Maybe the 10/22 as the perfect 22 rifle.

38spl? Easy. 4" revolver. A model 10 is the perfect harmony for that caliber.

45acp? Gotta go with John Moses Browning.. he would roll over in his grave if you picked anything but a 1911. but he'd probably carry the g-30s :D

30-30? Please. That is too easy. m1892.

I guess you could go down the caliber list & pick the perfect gun for each.. that is what the OP is asking, right?

I wouldn't want a 'too light' 12 ga, but ~ 7# for a nice o/u is ok, & 'svelte' works for me in a nice beretta or browning.

For sentimental reasons & aesthetics, i'd pick the k-22 6" masterpiece, but for capacity i'd go with a mk iii 7" auto. Those are both 'perfect' 22 pistols, for me.
 
M1 Garand and .30-06 are just about as perfect as chocolate and peanut butter.

1911 and 45ACP are also pretty nice.

M4-sized AR15 shooting .22LR is like shooting a laser beam.

-J.
 
CZ's mini-mauser actions are built around the cartridge they were made for. My CZ-527 carbine chambered in 7.62x39 is just right. No extra, un-needed bolt throw or travel like many other bolt actions out there.

I will also agree that the K-Frame is perfect for the 38 Special, and 45acp is right at home in a full size 1911.
 
Steyr/Mannlicher in 8x56R or Mosin M44 in 7.62x54 are sized right for masochists.

Ruger Blackhawk in 44 mag is a wonderfully balanced piece.
Semi auto rifles have more gray area here, I think.
FALs, ARs (in 5.56), AK (7.62), and most any 22LR come pretty close.
 
PPK for .380
K Frame 4 Inch .38 Special
Browning High Power 9mm
1911 .45
Model 60 Marlin for .22 rifle
Springfield 1903 for .30-06
Swedish 94 Mauser Carbine for 6.5x55
K98 Mauser for 8mm
AR15 for .223
 
JMB got it right with the 1911. Just the right amount of metal to contain and safely operate the pistol.
 
Most all of them. It is pretty rare to find something that just seems out of place.
 
I do enjoy my Ruger SP101 with full power .357 magnums. I know some people will balk at that statement but I am not recoil adverse and I enjoy know I am shooting something with that much power out of a small formed gun.

I have to agree with the 1911 and .45. I do enjoy that combo also.
 
Colt Mustang/SIG P238 is a perfect combination of size and design for the .380 ACP cartridge. The Browning Hi-Power and the CZ P01 are well proportioned for the 9mm. For me the Colt Combat Commander has always felt "just right" when it comes to the .45 ACP.
 
M1 carbine in .30 carbine. The gun was designed around the cartridge.
The 1911, as already stated.
The Luger in 9mm Luger (designed together).
The P38 in 9mm Luger.
The K frame revolver in .38 Spl., as already stated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top