What happens after Rittenhouse is acquitted?

Status
Not open for further replies.
He needs to sue the MSM they have told nothing but lies about him.

If he is acquitted of all charges I have no doubt he will sue, there will be an endless line of attorneys ready to assist. He certainly has an excellent chance of getting a significant settlement. In some states a successful self-defense ruling is an affirmative defense to being sued by the "victim" or their family, but from what I understand that isn't the case in Wisconsin.

The problem the prosecution faces here is the fact that they must get a unanimous jury vote to convict, which might not be an easy thing to do with the quality of their evidence and the missteps they have made. I am just getting over a case of a bug going around here locally that had me in the house for three days and I had little to do except watch the trial, background newscasts, and read about it on the internet, and I would certainly not vote to convict even on the weapons charge. BUT that means absolutely nothing as to what these jurors may or may not conclude.

I also think him getting off on the streets alone carrying the carbine was a very poor choice, I can't really fault his actions once the attacks on him started but these guys that furnished him with the weapon and then let him wander off on his own are, not to put too fine a point on it, pure idiots. Negative reactions from the crowd of "protesters" would seem to have been certain and forseeable.
 
Last edited:
Not sure that he's gonna be acquitted... (hope he will be) but I'm not sure. Juries (people) can be unpredictable, and right now half the damn country is straight up insane.

One thing I am sure of, if he is, it will make for some interesting TV. I know it's not summer, (prime riot season) but I'm guessing that will only slightly damper the violence.
The lefties, and the media have been working overtime with the "white supremacy" crap all this time.
 
He shouldn't have ever been arrested and
jailed to begin with
Questioned, yes
When multiple attackers are intent on
bashing your head in an leaving your
carcass in the streets, you should have
every right to defend yourself with as
much force as necessary.
He made it out unscathed and they're PO'ed
about it? Yeah. . .
If he'd been part of a dope deal gone wrong
he'd never been jailed

Upside down world we're in today
 
That’s just what Marxist revolutionaries strive for. I think you’ll see lots more Brownshirt action from ANTIFAsnd BLM. I saw last week that George Sorros cut loose another 16 billion to his network of “ community action groups “. That’s where and how they get their money to operate.
On another cheerful note the NYC chapter President ( like all of their leadership a dedicated MARXIST) got right on the face of NYCs new mayor saying if They don’t get what they want they’re going to wreck the place. That may get interesting as the radicals have so far enjoyed rioting in cities where police were deliberately held back. It could be greatly different this time around.
 
If it was up to me he’d be found not guilty on all charges. Unfortunately it’s not up to me and people are unpredictable. I think he has a good chance of being found innocent but if I was a betting man my money would be on a hung jury. I wouldn’t be surprised if there are 1-2 anti gun moonbats on the jury that will not want to let him off on all charges.
 
The weather next week in Kenosha (a high of 51º on Tuesday, and high 40s the rest of the week) will likely dampen the ardor of the rentamob to create "backlash."

Given that this is Legal, to answer the question in the OP title, on acquittal, KR would have his bail vacated (and the sums put on deposit for that returned less bail fees) and be set free,
Afterward, as an adult citizen he would face the same "risk" of civil tort suits most of us face (if with some potential additional risk of barratry from certain political elements).

I will opine it will be difficult for KR to have any "visibility" on social media platforms, and the "baggage" of his "history" will likely interfere with any plans for his immediate future. He's unlikely to be admitted to most universities, or gain any sort of local employment. He will have a difficult road ahead.

Political protests without permits, or those involving destruction of property are already illegal, and a case could be made that planning to engage in such illegal behavior is, in itself, a further crime.
 
I agree and I hope he makes out big. The mainstream media doesn't seem to want to learn from their mistakes of defaming 17 year olds... like Nicolas Sandmann. Oh... but I'm sure it is an honest mistake that in both instances they piled on a young white male/kid with zero other instances of defaming any other person of color or non white origin. They even had to give Zimmerman a hyphen... a White-Hispanic cause he was a Jewish Hispanic. lol Till Zimmerman came along, I have never heard of a hyphenated white this or that. But the Obama administration made racism a hallmark of their administration so now we have white this and that but they made Rachel Dolezal one of their heroes. You can't make this up.
 
I wonder if at least one juror hasn't considered the possible consequences to his/herself, family and property if they don't appease the violent mob that may result in anything less than conviction on all counts. Got to give them credit. I'd like to think so, but not sure if I would have the fortitude.
 
Consequences cut both ways. There have been pro and con personal threats, as in all situations. Riots are in one direction though.
 
Rittenhouse will undoubtedly file multiple lawsuits. I believe he will win most of them and that he is entitled to compensation.

That's an assumption. You should have asked "if he sues for defamation what are his chances of winning". The answer to that is "it depends". It depends upon who, in what setting. No one in the courtroom is going to be sued. No talking head or news person is going to be sued. No politician is going to be sued. No random person on social media, in a forum, on the street is going to be sued. For defamation to get any traction with a court you'd have had to not shot anyone.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top