Lost Sheep
Member
I had to laugh
Walkalong, 64 minutes after gofastman thanks me for a clear answer, you come along and blow it apart! I had to laugh.
The point of most of my post is that there is no clear, definitive anwer, which you proved.
(Actually, the "no" is pointed more towards the part of the question that refers to the brass releasing pressure and implicitly protecting the rest of the gun and/or the shooter and bystanders.)
When failure occurs among many components simultaneously, it pretty much doesn't matter which fails first. The steel supports the brass head. If the steel fails, the brass surely will. If the brass fails, the steel might or might not, but even if it does not, the results are almost always unpleasant.
Internal ballistics. A lifetime's worth of study.
Lost Sheep.
Walkalong, 64 minutes after gofastman thanks me for a clear answer, you come along and blow it apart! I had to laugh.
The point of most of my post is that there is no clear, definitive anwer, which you proved.
(Actually, the "no" is pointed more towards the part of the question that refers to the brass releasing pressure and implicitly protecting the rest of the gun and/or the shooter and bystanders.)
When failure occurs among many components simultaneously, it pretty much doesn't matter which fails first. The steel supports the brass head. If the steel fails, the brass surely will. If the brass fails, the steel might or might not, but even if it does not, the results are almost always unpleasant.
Internal ballistics. A lifetime's worth of study.
Lost Sheep.