What I like in a dangerous game rifle.

Status
Not open for further replies.

H&Hhunter

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 28, 2003
Messages
13,341
I have read a statement that chills me more than once on this and other sites. "I don't need a heavy caliber because my PH will have one and he can save my bacon if need be".

On a hunt several years ago after the conclusion of the hunting activities my PH admitted to me that he had just prayed that we didn't get into a close quarters charge because his .458Lott (A bush worn old CZ602)was jamming so often that he didn't trust that he would ever have more than one shot. That should make you think twice. And the really scary part is that I spoke to the outfitter that he hunts for in Reno this year and guess what? He still has the same CZ and it is still jamming with great regularity. he has never bothered to get it fixed due in part to the difficulty of finding a capable gun smith in that part of Africa.

With that being said let me state for the record that A hunter should never depend on a another mans skills or equipment to keep him out of trouble in any dangerous situation. If you are going to hunt potentially deadly game you must have a rifle that is capable of handling anything that may come your way.

I also hear the phrase that "a PH is happier with a client that shows up with a .375 that he can shoot well rather than a .458 that he can't". While this is true he's even happier when a client shows up with a heavy that he can shoot well.

Here's what I like

First and foremost you must be able to shoot the rifle well. If that means a .375H&H then thats what it should be. But don't think that a .375 is enough gun io turn a buff in tight cover it just doesn't have enough of anything except penetration which kills but doesnt stop. I also believe that anybody who can shoot a .375 can shoot a .416Rem. Elephant rounds start at .416 in my opinon. Buff round start at .375H&H both of which should be considered a bare minimum.

The bullet should be a super premium such as a Barnes X, Swift A-frame, or aome such. The bullet should also be as heavy as you can shoot for caliber in any case the SD must be .300 or better.

On elephant notthing but solids should be used. On buff A soft first and the rest solids are a good idea. Although I wouldn't hesitate to use a premium soft for the second round on buff.

The rifle should be short and fast handling, and well balanced. It should fit YOU well. When you cheek it you need to be looking down the sights. No head adjustment required.

The rifle must be a controlled round feed PERIOD. Push feed rifles are a liability Rem 700's Weatherby's and savages are cool for deer but should stay in camp for dangerous stuff.

The rifle should be iron sighted with either shallow v express sights or preferably a large apature ghost ring such as an AO sight. If it is glassed it must be with a low power variable or fixed scaope and if it's a variable it MUST be carried on it's lowest setting at all times. If you turn it up for a shot train to always turn it down afterwards or one of these days it will get you killed or stomped.

If you think that all it takes to stop a charge is shot placement your dreaming. A charging whatever is moving at fast speed and the "sweet" spot is bobbing up and down not to mention you are going to be highly adrenalized. In a perfect worldwe wait for justthe right moment and send a solid up the left nostril into the brain. In the real world we need enough horse power to stun, turn or stop an animal with a good yet less than perfect shot. LIKE they say when things go bad there is no such thing as enough gun.

So in a nut shell MY criteria for a dangerous game rifle are this.

It must be able to fire a round of at least 400grs with a sectional density of 300 or better.

It must produce a minimum of 5000ft/bs the muzzle.

It must feed,function and point flawlessly every time. From any positon IE upside down side ways ETC.

Wether a double or a bolt gun is your choice but it must meet all of the critteria stated above.

This is my criteria. You are welcome to disagree..:)
 
I was thinking about the controlled feed thing a few weeks ago when someone mentioned they had a 700 in .375 H&H that they could use "for anything in the world." I questioned the use of a 700 for DG hunting and he said the PH would have a bigger gun, which seemed kinda sketchy to me. Thanks for confirming my suspicions:)
 
OK, I disagree. :) . Really though, I think anyone that can shoot a .375 can probably shoot a .458 lott. My heavy bolt gun is a CZ in .458 lott. With a recoil reducer in the stock, it is just plain fun to shoot. The recoil reducer also moves the center of mass back a bit, which I find makes for a livelier gun. However, a long-action rifle like that would never meet your criteria for 'short and fast handling'. Long and fast handling is a better description, even with a 22" barrel.

When I go buffalo hunting this fall, however, I'll be taking my double rifle. I'm going to drop your SD requirement down to 0.290, because my .475 NE#2 is regulated for 480 grain bullets with an SD of .294. Your 5000 ft lbs also puts most of the NE cartridges on the edge (or a little under). .450/.400 NE is well under, along with the 9.3x64. I don't know if that makes sense or not.

My softs and solids are Woodleighs, but I sure agree with your choices of Barnes X bullets and Swift A-frames (I think swift A-frames are semi-magical).

You don't talk about lions or leopards. Leopard hunting is a different choice completely, I guess. I would want a scoped rifle for lion hunting. Which for me, means the .458 lott, because its uncool to put a scope on a double rifle. ;)

I am a bit stunned your PH would, when hunting dangerous game, carry around a rifle he knows is unreliable. He must have a lot of confidence in you and plenty of life insurance.

Regards
--Dan
 
I had a 20"bbled 458Lott on an enfield P14 action. It weighed a hair over 8lbs. Iron sights with a timney trigger. It was a pretty good rifle. Surprisingly it didnt knock the crap out of me with 500gr hornadies.

Sold it, I'm gonna build something a little better. I'm thinking maybe a CZ with a 18" bbl, kevalar stock..etc

I do disagree about CRF being the ultimate action. anybody can get a malfunction with any action. I've had 700's (and a few post 64 70's) and never had a problem with them. With the bears up here I want something I can trust, so far I havent been proven wrong.
 
from what i've read about the differences in the bolt styles, I don't the CRF vs PF argument is about reliability. It seems to be more about the fact that a CRF bolt can feed a cartridge with the gun at any angle (I've held my M77 upside down to test it) while a push feed bolt can't.
 
Hello H&H Hunter: I think you set forth a pretty agreeable set of criteria for DG rifles, with I think Dan the Man giving some valuable insight also, the Smar Tass NE marginal remarks, notwithstanding! ;)
 
I have no experience with doubles (other than drooling over them) so these comments pertain only to bolt actions.

Aside from the cartridge, I think there are two criteria that a DGR must exhibit: The rifle must fit the user, and the rifle must be reliable.

Rifle fit is overlooked altogether too often. Watch people at the range - how often, even when shooting offhand, do they move the rifle around on their shoulder, move their head back and forth or up and down in an effort to see the sights, or otherwise fiddle with the gun before they're "comfortable" with it?

A DGR should come smoothly to your shoulder and nestle right into place, at which point the sights ought to be aligned doggoned close to your target.

Second, it must be reliable. That means it must pick up shells smoothly from the magazine, feed them smoothly into the chamber, and extract and eject them - every time without fail. Loaded rounds should also extract and eject reliably. The sights, if open, should NOT have multiple leaves, and ought to be quick to acquire. The 'scope, if any, should be a quality glass in good steel mounts. The floorplate must NOT pop open when you have a full magazine, the safety must work right, and the sling swivels ought to be QD type so you can remove the sling when going into the thick stuff.

Beyond that, the finish on the rifle should be muted, not shiny; and the stock should have proper reinforcing crossbolts. In most cases, a recoil lug on the barrel (as well as the action) should be properly bedded into the stock.

My Zambian PH had BRNO rifles in .375 and .458. He was a bit shaken when I pointed out that BOTH of them were showing hairline splits around the magazine box. Disaster waiting to happen.

The DGR should be in some commonly-available caliber so, in a pinch, locally available ammo can be used. I know of several cases where, for whatever reason, a hunter's rifle and ammo were separated. That means no wildcats, no matter HOW great the ballistics are. (.458 Lott is an exception, as one CAN use .458 Win Mag in a pinch.)

CRF is generally good, but not all CRF rifles make good DGRs. For example, the A-Square rifles I've looked at were made on Enfield actions, and didn't have a bevel on the front of the extractor. The maker didn't want to "weaken" the claw by beveling it, but that meant that, even in an emergency, you could NOT feed a round directly into the chamber, close the bolt, and shoot. (Yes, I know CRF rifles should always feed from the magazine. But when TSHTF . . . )

On caliber . . . yes, more is better. But I do believe a .375 qualifies as a DGR. I don't pretend to have all the answers - some might say I have just enough African hunting experience to be dangerous ;) - but I've had the opportunity to speak to men with FAR more experience than I'll EVER accumulate . . . and the very WORST I've heard about the .375 was that it was "OK." (Except where Silvertip ammo is concerned.)

Only top-quality, premium bullets should be considered.

My DGR is a somewhat-customized Browning Safari in .375. It doesn't have CRF, but after some modest modifications, it's become a totally reliable working rifle that fits me like an extension of my arm. I use my own handloads, prepared with extreme care. For soft points, I use Swift A-Frames. Solids, I use Speer AGS. Each weighing 300 grains, of course.

I do wish this rifle had a drop-box magazine holding five rounds, but, other than that, I like it a lot.
 
I agree with HankB about gun fit. The virtue of the double gun is that it comes up like a properly fitting shotgun with the sights aligned and on target. I've see too many guys also throw a scoped boltgun to their shoulder and have to fiddle around to get a sight picture. Not for me. The open express sights would be better but even then gun fit should be a priority.
 
HankB


The rifle should be short and fast handling, and well balanced. It should fit YOU well. When you cheek it you need to be looking down the sights. No head adjustment required.

Hank this was my 8th paragraph yet should not be taken lightly as you reiterated......


Dan



I'm going to drop your SD requirement down to 0.290, because my .475 NE#2 is regulated for 480 grain bullets with an SD of .294. Your 5000 ft lbs also puts most of the NE cartridges on the edge (or a little under). .450/.400 NE is well under, along with the 9.3x64. I don't know if that makes sense or not.

When I go to the Zambezi this summer I'll be carrying a .470NE (Double for those who don't know)shooting 500gr Barnes x and monolithic solid for buff, hippo and possibly elephant (I may be able to go on a cull hunt). My other rifle is a scoped .375 H&H shooting 300gr X's and solids.

I think most of the NE rounds from the .458 diameter up meet the 5000Ft Lb level quite easily don't they?

The .450-400 is a magical round that slays buff just by pointing at them ;) No further comment on that grand old round.........

As far as the 9.3X64's and 74r's they are so close to the .375 in performance that they should be considered an equal which is my opinon the bare minimum on buff.

When I say DGR I am refering to the hunting of thick skinned dangerous game. When it s=comes to lion leopard brown bears that's a whole nother topic. I should have made the crieteria clear for the game I was speaking of.

As far as all of you push feed guys out there...I agree that not all CRF actions are good for a DGR platform I must also say that no push feeds are suitable DGR actions simply from the stand point that they will not function upsidedown or laying on the open side of the action. And you never know when you'll need that nifty little function.

A doube takes that out of the equation entirley untill it comes time to reload.:uhoh:
 
Last edited:
I've never had a failure to feed with a push-feed rifle, but then I never had to try it in the middle of a stumble/fall down/rollover. :) That's when that little bit of insurance makes a difference. Bang and thump your body halfway through a cycle, and it could get embarrassing.

Art
 
I've shot Remington 700 rifles for over 35 years and never had a problem with it FTF.... ever.

12-34,

You are missing the point entirely..........

Right now go get your Rem 700 lie down on the floor hold your rifle upside down and try and feed a round from the magazine as fast as you can ..........Tell me how it works out.

Feed and fire is not the issue I have with push feeds it's how do they feed when your on your back or when you've stumbled as your cycling the bolt.
And consequence of a miss feed could well cost you your life or worse yet the lives of others.

We are not talking about ops normal here we are talking worst case scenarios. Which is how you need to approach this subject.
 
I have double fed my Savage 116 on an Antelope hunt, considering I had just missed the shot of a life time at a big trophy antelope, I was pretty amped up. It took me 30 seconds and a swiss army knife to unjam my rifle.

That has NEVER happened with my old Springfield. Ramming stripper clips and trying to get off ten shots in 60 seconds at 200 yards is a pretty mean feat. I'm not sure I could do that with my Savage, even with a spare laoded mag at the ready.

I still want a heavy.. I've been drooling over that CZ 550 Magnum for a couple of years and it's FIRST on my "want" list. Will it ever go to Africa? Well the publishing biz needs to treat me better first.

The fact remains that the CZ is the least expensive quality rifle available for the money out there. It still has two big drawbacks, namely the barrel is too long, and the forward swivel is on the forestock instead of the barrel. I'd like to see true express sights as well.
 
Last edited:
. . . the CZ is the least expensive quality rifle available for the money out there. It still ahs two big drawbacks, . . .
Unless the new CZs have dual reinforcing crossbolts - one in front of, one behind, the magazine box, it actually has at least three drawbacks.

But with a little work, it's a fine basis for a heavy.
Hank this was my 8th paragraph yet should not be taken lightly as you reiterated......
H&H, on this point we're completely in agreement. Few today seem to consider "fit" of a rifle important.

On the other hand . . . I believe that disqualifying a rifle because it may not feed when you're lying upside down is a bit of a stretch. I don't recall reading anything in the works of Capstick, Bell, Kinloch, etc. that mention this particular scenario . . . though I DO remember someone mentioned a broken Mauser-type extractor on a Rigby rifle . . . ;)
 
Hank actually we are in agreement on everything except the push feeg thing.

http://www.african-hunter.com/it's_all_in_the_claw.htm

This explains it better than I ever can.

I will not use a push feed on dangerous game. You are welcome to.. This is just my opinon and I am far from being the "rifle god"..

However tripping or winding up on your back during the moment of truth is not a stretch at all. Not only has it happened it will happen it can and does happen, not frequently but when it does you'll need a rifle that will feed from an odd angle or while stumbling around.;)

To go to that page in the african hunter you'll need to cut and paste or if you don't know how just type it in with out the URLs included.
 
Here are my heavy DGR's


Left to right

Win mod 70 CRF stainless .375H&H 20" BBL topped with a leupold 1.75X6.

Searcy box lock ejector double in .470NE 24" BBL

Win Mod 70 CRF stainless .458Lott 22" BBL AO ghost rings and dual recoil lugs

I like em simple solid.

Hey Hank why do think it is that most all pros past and present use either a double or a mauser type rifle CRF? Seriously?
;)
 
For those of you guys who haven't seen these rounds I have included this picture and have put in a .308win for size comparison.

Left to right

.470NE 500gr Woodleigh soft point
.458Lott 500Gr Woodleigh solid
.375H&H 300gr Barnes Monolithic solid
.308 Win 150gr corelockt.


I am not trying to be a total thread hog I just know that I like this kind of stuff and thought some other members may as well.
 
If someone has a thing against PF's, more power to them. I like CRF also. Although I also like rem's. I do have 1 question though. Everybody brings up about shooting upside down. How do you screw up enough to have to shoot while upside down? I can agree with being knocked down and shooting from the ground but in most cases the critters on top of you by that time and a rifle usually wont do any good. If you trip (which does happen) and still shoot your a moron and shouldnt be in the field, its a bad shot. If your being charged and trip, its to late usually. I know bears arent dangerous and all, but I'll trust a PF in a charge. It worked for me.

Learn how to stay calm and do what your supposed to do and things usually work out.
 
Well, I think I understand the CRF vs PF argument allright, but I just took my 2 rem 700's, one in 270 Win and the other in 308, inverted both and cycled a magazine full on both without a problem. Is this normal or is it because neither one shoots a belted case? Either that or I got really lucky, and these are neck sized hand loads.

Obviously, the missing ingredient other than a belted case is a really mad cape buffalo or large animal. I guess that I could see if someone was cycling their bolt and in the middle of it fell on their tookus that it might cause a problem in feeding.
 
If someone has a thing against PF's, more power to them. I like CRF also. Although I also like rem's.

lilbiggun,

I don't have anything against pushfeeds I own several of them and they are accurate fine shooting rifles. I just don't use them for this application.


I also never said bear hunting isn't dangerous. It can get real western real fast in some circumstances. Statistically speaking however alot more hunter/guides get the chop from buff & elephant than bears. Untill you've seen an adrenalized buff soaking up heavy caliber slugs like they were fly bites it's very difficult to believe. The punishment these animals can take when they are amped up is astounding.

I've seen a little ole interior grizz outside of Kotzebue take some unbelievable punisment before he went to Vallhalla as well.

Now as far as staying calm. I consider my self pretty hard to rattle. I've landed four different airplanes dead stick off field one of them on fire. That didn't bother me. I've woken up to a bear sniffing my head in a tent on the aggieshakshak river. That didn't bother me. I'm married to a mean old women who makes her living cutting the balls off any male animal alive. That don't bother me. I've shot a dagga boy 12 times with a .458lott all in the money zone and he was still able to give it a go 20 minutes latter. That didn't bother me. I have to admitt though Remingtons and Chevys do bother me a bit. Just a quirk in my personality. Notthing against you. :D

So don't take it wrong.

My question still stands however. First did you read the article in African hunter from above? What did you think of it? Second why do all of the pros who are worth their salt use a CRF or a double rifle? I believe that long hard lessons in the field indicate that it is a better action for the intended application. I'm sure that there have been some old timers who had a full career with a Browning or Remington PF in their hands with no troubles what so ever. The vast majority however will not carry them.

I'd like to hear about your bear trouble sometime. Any of these type of experiences are educational for all of us I think.:)
 
You dont like Rems or chevies? Oh man, dont worry I still have respect for you:D

I hope I didnt cause any ill feelings or anything, I wasnt try to start trouble or insinuate that anybody on this board cant stay calm during a stressful situation. I was just trying to point out that any rifle is only as good as the person holding it. I've seen people freeze up solid just cuz a brownie passes on the trail ahead of them.

I've never been to africa (yet) so obviously I have never seen the punishment that a buff can take. I dont doubt anybody that a pissed off buff is one of the worst animals on the world.

I read the article and I dont disagree one bit with anything in it.

I'm still curious about the chambering while upside down bit. Realisticly its true but if I'm trying to chamber a round upside down, it means I have more problems than the rifle :D

As for a charge. seen the bear at 68yards (ranged) it seen us adn didnt like it. By the time I got the rifle in my shoulder it was at about 20yards. Stoppeda t about 10-15yards. Pawed the ground (it was slightly miffed at us), turned and walked away. I guess it changed its mind and came back again. This time if it was to take 1 more step I was gonna shoot. he musta grown a brain cuz he retreated again and we got out of there. It was our fault, we put ourselves in the situation. The 338 bore seemed alwfully small.
 
http://www.african-hunter.com/it's_all_in_the_claw.htm This explains it better than I ever can.
H&H, interesting article. But the author kind of undermines his own credibility when he writes:
First let's consider the umbiquitous Lee Enfield. . . .by far and away the best military bolt action produced.
I thought the author's points on spring-loaded vs. non-spring loaded ejectors were interesting, and probably more significant than the need to load while inverted.

Speaking of which, just for the heck of it, I tried cycling my Browning .375 upside down - no easy task from a manual dexterity standpoint, and not one I believe I could accomplish while flat on my back in the field under stress - and it worked. :cool:

And I've yet to read anywhere of such a thing actually happening in any of the books I've read on African hunting. If you can cite me some sources, I'd sure like to read about them.

So IMHO CRF can be a good thing, assuming the rifle doesn't have some other inherent weaknesses. (Note, I never said CRF was bad.) But it's not absolutely essential. I suspect we'll just have to agree to disagree.

As for doubles, I like them. I don't own any, but would like to . . . but no less an authority than Karamojo Bell considered them unsuitable for hard conditions, as he claimed dust and such would tie them up more quickly than a Mauser-type bolt action. :what:
 
Lillbiggun,

No man..... I wasn't in anyway feeling put out or discredited or angered by your statments, which all have relevance to this subject. Thank you for your input!

I've been in a simular situation with a grizz on several occasions and they have all been my fault. You're decsion making was right on. It is very difficult to know when enough is enough and drop that hammer. That bear was just giving you the ole threat display to see if you would run. ;)

None the less it's an eye opening experience huh?

Hank,

I don't find any flaws in your gun logic I'm just opinonated on some subjects. And I guess this is one of em..;)

I'd hunt with you and your Browning anyday. I'll just try to keep you from doing back flips while reloading.

As far as the whole shooting while on your duff thing I've read about it in various places and I've heard about it from different people and I've even done it once while hunting hogs. Tripped while cycling the bolt while running after a big ole boar. got up to one knee and fired. As far as finding you specific sources if I run across any I'll try and remeber to send em your way.

I didn't remeber Bell not liking doubles. I know that Taylor sure did. While i of course can't hold a candle to man such as bell i can tell you that a modern double can take some pretty good basghing and dirt and still operate. I hope that I didn't just jinks myself but so far so good as far as my double has been concerned.

I've taken to the ranch about a dozen times and purposley let it get filthy with dust and used it hard..........It'll probably break in the middle of Zimbabwe with my luck but thats why i always bring along ole faithfull the .375 every where I go. Just in case.:eek:
 
H&H . . . no hard feelings, we just differ a bit in our opinions. :cool:

You just be real careful next time you go to Zimbabwe . . . sounds like things are heading south real fast over there. (Check out the archives at http://africantears.netfirms.com/preface.htm .) And World Net Daily says that rumors of racial nastiness in RSA are rampant, to be triggered by the passing of Mandela . . . which might spread north. Uh oh . . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top