what is the real future soldier weapon?

[panzermk2]

which one? the SCAR is already replacing the M4.
The F2000 is already under full deployment

I also don't understand your use of Practical ?
The F2000 has many ground breaking features including the soft spent casing eject, it's lighter and you do keep your hand on the pistol grip when fireing the launcher unlike the M4

 

[Bruce H]

Mel Gibsons line in Braveheart.
You dropped your rock

 

[TooTaxed]

Something along the lines of the current Chinese army small arms family. They rigorously tested the Russian 7.62 x 39 and 5.4 x 39 cartridges, and the American .223, then developed their own 6.8-mm short cartridge with ballistics and wound characteristics better than all, plus their own small arms semi-auto and full auto family to use it. They probably have the most modern small arms of any country in the world right now.

 

[huws]

TooTaxed
Senior Member



Join Date: 01-01-03
Location: Home Base Texas...temporarily in Georgia
Posts: 591 Something along the lines of the current Chinese army small arms family. They rigorously tested the Russian 7.62 x 39 and 5.4 x 39 cartridges, and the American .223, then developed their own 6.8-mm short cartridge with ballistics and wound characteristics better than all, plus their own small arms semi-auto and full auto family to use it. They probably have the most modern small arms of any country in the world right now.
__________________
John
NRA Benefactor Member, ex-Kalifornian

it does not like what you said.

 

[brerrabbit]

I am kinda thinking crew served laser cannon.

Hear me out, I am not talking cutting laser, but a variable width high energy beam capable of permanently blinding the enemy out to several hundred yards.

I am talking about a power output high enough that it will still cause optical damage even with eyes closed and hands over the face . The good guys can use filtered visors that will make them immune to the effects of the beam, sidescatter and such.

Setting certain pulse frequencies could cause epileptic fits even in people that are not epileptic.

Use a laser design that allows the frequencies to be changed fairly easily to prevent the enemy from being able to adapt to it with their own countermeasures.

Because of the power requirements, It would probably have to be vehicle mounted.

Think about how the tactics would change if the enemy cannot shoot back because of either blindness or fear of being blinded.

 

[Pat Cannon]

Something I'm sure they could manufacture now is the special grenade, for clearing a building with minimum casualties, portrayed in Heinlein's Starship Troopers: It screams loudly in the appropriate language, "I am a thirty-second bomb! Twenty-nine! Twenty-eight! ..." (Heinlein didn't mention it, but a good feature would be a remote-control override and/or a change-of direction sensor for when somebody tries to pick it up and throw it back).

 

[The Grand Inquisitor]

The problem with our military is that they always want to integrate the next generation of technology with the previous generation of equipment.

I once had a lovely young female Army officer ask me how she would go about "ramming the power" when I asked how much RAM her computer had.

Her job was coordinating technology integration.


And this wasn't in 1980...this was around '01 or so.

 

[huws]

brerrabbit
Senior Member



Join Date: 08-21-05
Posts: 121 I am kinda thinking crew served laser cannon.

Hear me out, I am not talking cutting laser, but a variable width high energy beam capable of permanently blinding the enemy out to several hundred yards.

I am talking about a power output high enough that it will still cause optical damage even with eyes closed and hands over the face . The good guys can use filtered visors that will make them immune to the effects of the beam, sidescatter and such.

Setting certain pulse frequencies could cause epileptic fits even in people that are not epileptic.

Use a laser design that allows the frequencies to be changed fairly easily to prevent the enemy from being able to adapt to it with their own countermeasures.

Because of the power requirements, It would probably have to be vehicle mounted.

Think about how the tactics would change if the enemy cannot shoot back because of either blindness or fear of being blinded. [/QUOTE]

it is difficult to realize your idea for long time.

replied by Lee Yintao,a weapon design expert from China.

 

[huws]

QUOTE]The problem with our military is that they always want to integrate the next generation of technology with the previous generation of equipment.

[/QUOTE]


it is better to make a weapon ,user does not wear any bullet-proof vest while using.

replied by Lee Yintao,a weapon design expert from China

 

[huws]

Lee Yintao,a weapon design expert from China.

 

[XDKingslayer]

Glitterboys!

It's quite possible I'm the only one that knows what you're talking about.

 

[Strings]

I REALLY shouldn't post this (again)...

Why would we replace the AR system as our combat rifle? It's been in service long enough that we've worked most of the kinks and bugs out (i think the op-rod uppers are the last bit needed). It's infinitly configurable (can work as standard rifle, carbine, PDW, marksman's rifle, and squad automatic), available in many different calibers simply by swaping uppers (.22lr, 5.56mm, 7.62x39, a couple different 6.something offerings, and .50 Beowulf), and most currently in service already know how to operate the bloody thing. So I have to ask again: WHY do we want to replace it?

 

[panzermk2]

Drag it around a sand box with rag heads blasting away at you with rifles that never jam and always go bang. You will learn real fast why. The greatest thing to come along in a while for the AR is a FN-FAL gas and rod system. I think the guys in the funky sided building decided why stop at the gas/rod system lets adopt everything from FN. The SCAR platform is really just a mildly updated FAL.

 

[huws]

QUOTE] Yesterday, 07:07 PM #61
XDKingslayer
Senior Member



Join Date: 03-01-06
Location: Port Charlotte, Fl.
Posts: 315 Quote:
Glitterboys!

It's quite possible I'm the only one that knows what you're talking about.
[/QUOTE]

u are right,
i am thinking to chanllenge the Cornershot made by Israel.

replied by the future weapon design expert , Lee Yintao frome China.

 

[huws]

Strings
Senior Member



Join Date: 12-25-02
Location: 30 miles from Everywhere, right in the middle of Nowhere...
Posts: 1,636 I REALLY shouldn't post this (again)...

Why would we replace the AR system as our combat rifle? It's been in service long enough that we've worked most of the kinks and bugs out (i think the op-rod uppers are the last bit needed). It's infinitly configurable (can work as standard rifle, carbine, PDW, marksman's rifle, and squad automatic), available in many different calibers simply by swaping uppers (.22lr, 5.56mm, 7.62x39, a couple different 6.something offerings, and .50 Beowulf), and most currently in service already know how to operate the bloody thing. So I have to ask again: WHY do we want to replace it?
__________________
So... where ARE we going, and why ARE we in this handbasket?

formerly known as Hunter Rose

No Child Should Live In Fear
Airplane Pictures

WHY do we want to replace it? because the shooter is easy to hit by straight shot.he must wear a bullet-proof vest in combat.

replied by the future weapon design expert , Lee Yintao frome China.. .

 

[huws]

Lee Yintao,wireless TASER design expert from China.

 

[Rock_Steady]

Quote:
Glitterboys!


It's quite possible I'm the only one that knows what you're talking about.

You know, I had thought I was the only ex-rifts player here - good on ya.

But I think good vibro knife teamed with my coilgun would do me well - the sonic boom might be a bit irritating.......

replied by the current weapon using expert , not Lee Yintao from China.

 

[huws]

Rock_Steady
Senior Member

Join Date: 05-04-05
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 136
Quote:
Quote:
Glitterboys!
It's quite possible I'm the only one that knows what you're talking about.

You know, I had thought I was the only ex-rifts player here - good on ya.

But I think good vibro knife teamed with my coilgun would do me well - the sonic boom might be a bit irritating.......

replied by the current weapon using expert , not Lee Yintao from China.
__________________
Good.....Bad..........I'm the one with the gun.

it is very clear that u are the current weapon using expert,but i am the current weapon making expert Lee Yintao from China.

 

[huws]

H i , everybody.