Just to clarify, I believe that CZ-UB was accurate in their claims, but somewhat unclear.
Example:
Huge Developed Nation buys 1 million of Model X for their primary service siderarm. No one else ever orders Model X in significant quantities.
Meanwhile, ten (10) Small Undeveloped Nations scattered over three continents each order ten thousand units of Model Y for a total of one hundred thousand units.
Which is more widely distributed: Model X or Model Y? I wouldn't feel like I was lying or dissembling if I said Model Y. Model X got one order, it just happened to be huge. Ten nations are using Model Y as opposed to one. To me, that qualifies as "more widely distributed."
Is it misleading? Probably. On the other hand, reasonable people should be able to pick up on this. That is, I think it should be pretty obvious that more High Powers have been produced than CZ 75/85 series pistols, at least to date.
As someone who knows CZs pretty well, I also knew that many of their customers are in fact smaller, undeveloped nations without much, if any, domestic military industrial complex. This is actually a pretty strong endorsement. These countries cannot afford to spend money on something that won't work.