Posted by 357 Terms:bowling pins and IDPA are a far cry from self defense shootings. Sure its fun but competing and fighting are totally different, nobody shoots back.
Of course.
However, IDPA is intended to teach and develop the
skills needed for self defense.
Specifically, the purpose is to develop the skills necessary to make
very fast multiple hits on multiple targets, while moving. From that standpoint, there are very strong similarities, and if you cannot develop and practice those skills, you are at a disadvantage.
Further, as S&Wfan pointed out two years ago, your choice of weapon and load can put you at a disadvantage in IDPA-like shooting, and if it does that, it can put you at a disadvantage in a self defense encounter.
Now, that post was about those very light scandium J frames. The OP has a somewhat heavier revolver. Perhaps he could do better at pins and IDPA; I don't know.
Regardless, as S&Wfan also pointed out, "you don't need a .357". He is, of course, talking about civilian carry not involving animal encounters.
That seems to be very difficult for a lot of people to accept. Many of those of us who have never shot anyone, who may have shot water jugs, and who have read a lot of old books and articles, long assumed that the bigger the bang in one's hand, the better the results in a self defense encounter. I bought a .45 ACP pistol about a year and a half ago; everyone knows the legend and the folklore. Imagine my utter disbelief when posts started showing up stating that the .45 ACP isn't really all that more effective than a hot 9MM. The evidence seems to be pretty strong, however. What really got my attention, however, was Patrick Sweeney's comment that the reason the Army wanted a .45 at the turn of the last century was the need to take down
horses. It had never occurred to me that the original Model 1911 was intended as a cavalry weapon!
So, unless one is using an anemic load, it comes down to how well he can shoot--not at the range in slow fire, but in something that resembles IDPA practice.
...practice and you can become proficient...
Until I took an advanced pistol course earlier this year, the only handgun shooting I had been regularly doing was at a target range; I looked at group size, and my speed in presentation, speed in moving from one target to another (essentially, same skill as need for tracking a moving target), and making extremely fast second and third shots remained untested and undeveloped. I was "proficient" at the range, but I didn't have the right skills. Thing is, I didn't know it.
I sure learned a lot from that experience. One thing was what to practice and how. Another was that some guns just don't meet my needs, either from the standpoint of "shootability" or capacity or both .
I heartily recommend that everyone try to attend something similar.