Phantom Warrior
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2003
- Messages
- 1,073
This is something I've been wondering about for some time. Most states have very specfic requirements in their carry laws regarding the size, language, location, etc of a sign banning guns. For example, in Minnesota the requirements are as follows:
1. "The requester has prominently posted a conspicuous sign at every entrance to the establishment containing the following language: '(INDICATE IDENTITY OF OPERATOR) BANS GUNS IN THESE PREMISES.' "
2. " 'Prominently' means readily visible and within four feet laterally of the entrance with the bottom of the sign at a height of four to six feet above the floor."
3. " 'Conspicuous' means lettering in black arial typeface at least 1-1/2 inches in height against a bright contrasting background that is at least 187 square inches in area."
What happens if a sign does not meet that criteria? I've seen signs at stores that read "No guns" or something similar. Is that sign valid and legally binding?
Yeah, I know "concealed means concealed" and all those other catch phrases I'm sure people will spout in this thread. But hypothetically, if I got caught how strong of a defense would the argument that their sign didn't meet legal requirements be?
1. "The requester has prominently posted a conspicuous sign at every entrance to the establishment containing the following language: '(INDICATE IDENTITY OF OPERATOR) BANS GUNS IN THESE PREMISES.' "
2. " 'Prominently' means readily visible and within four feet laterally of the entrance with the bottom of the sign at a height of four to six feet above the floor."
3. " 'Conspicuous' means lettering in black arial typeface at least 1-1/2 inches in height against a bright contrasting background that is at least 187 square inches in area."
What happens if a sign does not meet that criteria? I've seen signs at stores that read "No guns" or something similar. Is that sign valid and legally binding?
Yeah, I know "concealed means concealed" and all those other catch phrases I'm sure people will spout in this thread. But hypothetically, if I got caught how strong of a defense would the argument that their sign didn't meet legal requirements be?