Which Blued 6" S&W Revolver?

Status
Not open for further replies.
For a Model 19, with a 6" barrel, you can expect to pay $550, and upward.

For a Model 27, with a 6" barrel, you can expect to pay $700, and upward.

Your 95% criterion is setting the minimum you'll have to pay. Generally, the Model 27's will come with the Presentation case, and that keeps the prices up. The Model 19's with 6" barrels are less common than the 4" variety, but they generally cost a bit less. They're just not as popular.

There are Model 586's out there with 6" barrels, and they'll generally cost a bit less. They have the same stock size as the K frame. However, the beefed up L frame will handle any .357 magnum out there without the risk of flame-cut top straps, eroded forcing cones, and end shake that K frames can develop when shooting high velocity, light weight (125gr and less) loads.
 
I have a 6" M19, a 6" M66 and a 6" M28....all are much more accurate than their shooter....for ease of maintenance I endorse the M66, but, all are most excellent!
 
I admit it, I'm an evil rascal.

But you got it right with the S&W M14. I have quite a few older S&W revolvers and the M14 is the centerfire target revolver for me, as well.

Nill.jpg
 
N frame S&W

If you looking at a M-27 for target work. Consider a M-25 in 45 ACP.
Hard to beat the big fat holes made on paper with a 200 grain SWC.
The weight is a tad less then a M-27 due to the amount of metal removed from the cylinder and bore.
I have shot Bullseye with 625's and a M-14. They each have there days.
 
I'm now bent on having a Model 19. I like the ribbed top of the barrel (vs. 27's checkered) and the shrouded ejector (vs. Model 14).

I'm looking for one with a high gloss blued finish but has been shot, square butt, original target grips, and one dated from 1963-1972. Keep your fingers crossed for me to find a nice old one. Once I get it, I'll post pics and give a range report.
 
The Model 19 is a nice revolver and I've come across a couple 6" versions in the past. They don't seem to have been used as hard as the 4" and 2.5" specimens that I've looked at in the past.

I still have to put in a vote for the Model 14. It's a great revolver and since you're looking for a target revolver the shroud for the ejecter rod isn't as necessary. But it does add a little more weight I suppose and many like that. Here is my K-38 4 screw (mfd. 1955). It has a very smooth trigger action and at 25 yards (bench rest) will easily shoot the center out of a target.

LEt us know what you decide.

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=559042|My S&W Model K-38.
 
For my money S&W revolvers are just about the top of the heap. I have a Model 28-2 N frame .357 Highway Patrolman that is about the nicest wheel gun I've ever owned. Great SA trigger and about as smooth and light DA as any gun I've ever shot. With the six inch barrel and adjustable sights it's a first rate paper puncher especially with .38 specials. Recoil with .38s is very light and even with .367 this is a comfortable gun to shoot. Certainly not much of a concealable weapon but that big, heavy, strong frame makes for a great target revolver and side arm for open carry.
 
I agree with others here that the Model 14 is the way to go. It's THE classic target revolver in .38, and, across the range of issue, its accuracy is very reliable and consistent.
 
I just got a model 14 at auction. When i got it i pulled the trigger and the cylinder would rotate but the hammer wouldnt function. In single action it was an awesome 3.5 lbs with no travel at all. I took it to the gunsmith to get it fixed but he called me back and said its not broken.

Someone bought and installed a matched trigger and hammer to convert it to single action only...a bullseye gun. It shoots like an absolute dream. I really like the mod 14...its a great target piece.
 
I'll chime in with the SS m14 bunch. Short of a 38/22 outdoorsman is is the sweetest target shooting 6" out there. .38 special is just enough without going overboard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top