Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Which of these 44mag loads do you like best for mean ornery critters?

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by Balrog, Sep 22, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Balrog

    Balrog Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,176
    Basically, which would you consider best for a back country load?

    240g cast lead SWC at 1280 fps

    210g Winchester Silver Tip at 1400 fps

    200g Hornady XTP at 1410 fps


    Assume all three loads are equally accurate.
     
  2. jack44

    jack44 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2011
    Messages:
    669
    Location:
    North Woods - Wisconsin
    240 grains hard cast SWC
     
  3. Balrog

    Balrog Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,176
    Does the slower velocity of the SWC load bother you?
     
  4. Bula

    Bula Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    914
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    For anything bigger than me, that has the potential of digesting me, I like the idea of cast solids with wide meplates, pushed hard. I want bones breaking and two holes for every round. I consider the lightweight stuff mfg for personal defense, from people.
    That 240 will not likely be recovered from anything you shoot at defensive distances. I cast and load my own, but I really like the Lyman 429421 over 20g of 2400 OR the Lee 310g gas checked RNFP over 21.5g of W296. More weight/velocity yeilds better penetration, but 240g isn't exactly a lightweight.
     
  5. kelbro

    kelbro Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,264
    Location:
    Desert Southwest
    Same here...
     
  6. ranger335v

    ranger335v Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    3,797
    "240g cast lead SWC at 1280 fps'

    HARD cast. And I can easily add 100 fps from a 6" barrel Smith, 200 fps from a Ruger.
     
  7. Balrog

    Balrog Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,176
    I was actually chronographing the 240g cast load today, and got 1280 fps from a Ruger Blackhawk with 4.75" barrel and about 1150 from a S&W 629 with 4" barrel. I was surprised of the amount of difference. Do you think that was from the extra 3/4" of the Ruger barrel, or are some barrels just faster than others?
     
  8. Eb1

    Eb1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,010
    Location:
    USA
    it is both, and probably the cylinder gap also.
     
  9. Asherdan

    Asherdan Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2007
    Messages:
    527
    Location:
    Hoss Country /USA
    What the rest said as far as the cast SWC.

    I will say, if you had a 240g XTP in there pushed hard I'd have to think about it a little more. I've had good black bear/pig results with those. But the 200g gives me pause, although that might not be right.
     
  10. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,280
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    Of the three, definitely the 240gr SWC and you don't need another 100-200fps.

    However, define "mean and ornery".
     
  11. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    22,575
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    I'll make this one easy. A 45-70 round using a 400+gr Cast bullet traveling at very slow speeds compared to modern ammo will go completely through a Buffalo. Heavy and slow worked very well 138 years ago and still works well today.

    Of the 3 rounds listed I would also go with the 240g Cast LSWC round at 1280 fps...
     
  12. ranger335v

    ranger335v Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    3,797
    Speed helps anything that won't come apart but how fast does a boulder really need to go? ;)
     
  13. cactus02

    cactus02 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    Messages:
    82
    Location:
    peoples republic of Illinois
    Try the old Elmer Keith load. As I recall it was a 240 cast with lyman #2 lead over 2400 powder , can someone rember the ammount as my mind gets a bit fuzzy after thirty years or so.
     
  14. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    It was 22.0 grains then.

    But it's not anymore.

    Current data, with current 2400, in current cases, with current SAAMI pressure standards for the .44 Mag, suggests it is about a grain less.

    rc
     
  15. gamestalker

    gamestalker member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    9,832
    Location:
    SW Arizona
    I like either a 180 gr. XTP or a 200 gr. on top of a full load of H110 or 296. Just something about 1800 - 1900 fps that makes a statement. Not even a I/4" steel plate doesn't win an arguement at 75 yds. with that powder and bullet combination.
     
  16. codefour

    codefour Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    381
    Location:
    N. California
    I am new to reloading with about 18 months experience but have never hunted with reloads. I am going to start hunting wild pig in California and want to carry my .44 mag as a hunting handgun.

    In my profession, everything that we shhot in handgun is jacketed holow points due their increased stopping power. I was wondering why SWC bullets are better for hunting large game.? I will definitely try them but what are the advantages over JHP?

    Also, what Brinell hardness do you guys recommend for a hunting load for pigs??
     
  17. beatledog7

    beatledog7 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    5,093
    Location:
    Tidewater
    The whole point of a big bore revolver is heavy bullets pushed hard. Go with the 240gr SWCs.
     
  18. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    22,575
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    Unlike when trying to stop a man where you have a fairly soft and easy to kill target large animals are tough. Many have very thick skin and big heavy bones. A heavy lead projectile with a wide meplat will expand less and carry most of it's energy deep into and animal even when striking bone. I'm sure there's a more eloquent explanation but I'm a simple man so that's the best I can do...
     
  19. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,280
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    Yes, that you're trying to make it something it's not.
     
  20. Clark

    Clark Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    4,387
    Location:
    Where I5 meets the rain forest
    What "mean ornery critters"?
    Is this hunting or self protection?

    I feel very safe in the back country.
    Downtown sin city scares me.
     
  21. gamestalker

    gamestalker member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    9,832
    Location:
    SW Arizona
    I just have to chuckle at your remark CraigC, trying to make it something it's not. I'm not sure how a high performance load from a big bore handgun made exactly for that, is something it's not?

    Personally, I think some hand loaders are affraid of the slow burning powders and the data that applies. I don't know why fast powder - lead loaders are so temparmental about jacketed - slow burning powder- high velocity loaders?

    But be it as it may, there is nothing that compares to the magnitude of a high velocity magnum round, as exploited in marketing demonstrations. The .454 Casull as well performs at very high velocity when loaded with the good bullets and powders.
     
  22. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,280
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    You're trying to make it into something it will never be.....a rifle. Big bore handguns have two things going for them, bullet diameter and mass. They have one thing against them.....velocity. Not only is a standard weight cast bullet at moderate velocity vastly more pleasant to shoot but it is also more effective on game. It is also more consistently effective. Unlike a lightweight jacketed bullet that may produce a very shallow wound channel and ruin a lot of meat. Like Elmer Keith said of hunting with cast bullets, you can eat right up to the hole.


    I would certainly ask before I made that assumption.


    Because we found a better way. We also know that with cast bullets, absolute maximum velocity is not necessary.
     
  23. zfk55

    zfk55 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    299
    Location:
    Lost Prairie Montana
    I think I may have posted about this before, but my parents and their friends spend a lot of time in the woods during berry picking season. When they're on horseback in the woods or hunting they all carry what they call "skull crackers" in their revolvers.

    In my Dad's case its a .41 magnum with a 220gr hardcast bullet that's been center drilled. He then uses a steel panhead screw and turns it down flush against he bullet. Seat depth is set to allow for the panhead and for the cylinder to rotate freely.

    His business partner rembers his grandfather and their neighbors all doing the same thing as long ago as the 20's. Not much in the way of angry "critters" stand up to it, including bears.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page