Trey Veston
Member
I was getting a couple of my Glocks ready for a range trip and was surprised by how close they were in size.
One is my G29 and the other is my Gen 5 G23.
The G29 holds 10 rounds of 10mm while the G23 holds 13 rounds of .40 S&W.
The G29 is about a 1/4" shorter in length, height, and is tiny bit wider.
So, we all know the debate regarding how .40 S&W is not more effective enough than 9mm to put up with the increased recoil and reduced capacity. But what about 10mm?
Is it substantially more effective than 9mm to warrant diminished capacity and increased recoil?
I use my G29 for protection in the woods against wolves, cougars, and black bears. Never considered it as a CCW gun.
Don't want to start a debate, but I thought the idea of one gun for carry in both the woods and in town was intriguing.
One is my G29 and the other is my Gen 5 G23.
The G29 holds 10 rounds of 10mm while the G23 holds 13 rounds of .40 S&W.
The G29 is about a 1/4" shorter in length, height, and is tiny bit wider.
So, we all know the debate regarding how .40 S&W is not more effective enough than 9mm to put up with the increased recoil and reduced capacity. But what about 10mm?
Is it substantially more effective than 9mm to warrant diminished capacity and increased recoil?
I use my G29 for protection in the woods against wolves, cougars, and black bears. Never considered it as a CCW gun.
Don't want to start a debate, but I thought the idea of one gun for carry in both the woods and in town was intriguing.