Who has contacted their Reps?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Grant Cunningham has an excellent blog post with some very good advice about how to effectively write your congressperson. Take a minute and read it.

http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/1aec3e9a2cdb7468efa0b1adad770d68-1128.html

ALERT: It's time for you to do something!
Wednesday, January 02, 2013 Filed in: Current Events, Political Action

Happy New Year everyone! Well, it would be if the Second Amendment community weren’t facing a major fight at the dawn of 2013. This time they’re serious, and it’s going to take some work on our parts to win.

You see, Congress goes back to work tomorrow and one of the things they'll be working on is Dianne Feinstein's new gun control bill. I'll not waste the space here detailing the provisions - you can easily look them up with a five-second Google - but she's going for broke this time: the virtual elimination of all semi-automatic rifles and handguns, and the outlawing of any gun which carries more than ten rounds (including lever action rifles.) The exact content of the bill is as yet unknown, but she's pushing for mandatory registration and perhaps even confiscation.

Normally Congress would pretty much roll their collective eyes and say “there goes Dianne again”, but with the Sandy Hook murders still relatively fresh in the public's mind and with the complicity of both Hollywood and the media her bill is sure to gain traction it otherwise mightn’t. I don't believe her bill stands much of a chance of passage but that's not the point - it's a negotiating tactic, a way to steer the public perception toward "reasonable" gun control.

If we, the shooting community, don't act immediately her little scheme might just work. That means you and I - yes, you too - need to do something within the next week, maybe even sooner, if we're to counter this horrendous attack on our civil rights.

What to do? Lots of people are blithely exhorting you to write your Congressperson, but no one ever explains just how to go about doing so effectively - if they even know themselves. The problem with writing to Congress is that if you don't do it right your message will be completely ignored, and might even embolden an anti-gun legislator. I hope today I can shed a little light on the process and give you a few guidelines to help ensure that your voice is actually heard.

Here's what I've learned from talking with elected representatives (I even have one in the family though I don’t like to admit it), people who work or have worked for them, people in the media (I have one of those in the family too), as well as reading articles by people who have worked in Congressional offices:

- The first and most important thing you need to understand is that unless he/she knows you personally, your Senator or Representative will likely never see your letter. His/her office has aides or corespondents whose job it is to read the mail, categorize each response as for or against, and file it in the appropriate place. The Congressperson checks in with the aides (who are assigned to specific issues, like gun control) on a regular basis, asking how many times they've heard from constituents on the specific issue at hand. They'll be told how many letters they've received and what the for/against percentages are, but are unlikely to get anything more specific unless they ask. If the majority of the letters are on one side, that's what they'll be told.

- Remember that aides are usually fresh out of college, idealistic, and not very well paid. Don't be rude and never insult them or their boss or your letter will go missing - from what I've been told it's a sure bet. Don't say anything about your Congressperson being a scum-sucking gun grabber even if it is true; be polite, even if it kills you.

- Don't use paper. As a security precaution all snailmail goes to a central location where it's irradiated, examined, opened, scanned (probably with OCR) into an electronic file, and then that file is delivered to your Congressperson's office. They never see the paper unless they request it specifically. This process is said to take a week at best, and if there is a huge influx of correspondence it might take two or three or more. If there is a time-sensitive issue, as this is, a paper letter will almost certainly be too late. An email gets there faster and ends up in the same place anyhow, so there is no longer a reason to put pen to paper when writing Congress. Send an email.

- Don't write a book. The aides have a ton of letters to go through, don't have a lot of time, and are easily bored. Your letter should consist of a paragraph or two at the very most: tell them what you're writing about, how you want them to vote, and why it's important to you. That's it; resist the urge to write more. Ideally you should get that done in three well-crafted sentences, and as the volume of mail goes up the greater the importance of making your letter concise.

- If you're not a constituent - yes, they check - your letter will generally be ignored. In other words, unless you're actually in Feinstein's district don't waste your time writing her office; it won't do any of us any good even if you are polite.

- How do you make sure they know you’re a constituent? Put your name and address in the letter. I get emails constantly where the only identifier of the sender is "[email protected]". To me it's just annoying, but it causes Congressional aides to conclude one of two things: you're either out of district or sending robomails, either of which will cause your email to go right into the electronic trashcan. If you don't want that to happen put your FULL NAME and address in the body.

- Make sure your email has a subject; those without subjects might be filtered out by their office email system. I’m told the best thing to do is to put the title/number of the actual bill in the subject line so that the reason for your letter can be quickly determined.

- The NRA will probably send you an email with links to form letters that you can send to your Congressperson. DON'T DO IT. Form letters are nearly useless; when the aides are queried, one of the questions they're asked is what percentage of letters are of the form variety and which were actually written. The form letters have FAR less impact than those you send from your own keyboard (some say they are simply ignored. After all, if it was really important to you, you'd have written your own damn letter.) Again: DON'T USE FORM LETTERS. If you feel you can't make a good impression on the aides then have someone draft it for you, but don't use the prewritten missives from any group.

- If you even get a response it will almost certainly be a form letter. Deal with it. Go back to the first item: your Congressperson is NOT going to read your letter, and therefore is very unlikely to draft a personal response to you. Expect a form letter and don't go bitching on Facebook if you get one; it's just how the system works.

Now go use what you've learned, and let's see if we can head Feinstein's bill off at the pass!

-=[ Grant ]=-
 
Even though they may not and probablly never read any of this stuff, it at least shows how we feel about it. If suddenlly they get thousands of email that they hadn't gotten before, it may shake even "their" cobwebs loose.
Those on the fense or looking to get re elected are the easiest to bring over to the side of right.
 
I wrote mine and she responded with her cut and paste email response how she wants to get dangerous assault weapons off the street. I hate living in Seattle :(

Democrats are so pro civil rights until we get to the 2nd amendment it seems
 
Just a thought here....does it make any sense to elect liberal Democrats and then ask them to be on our side on any gun issue? No matter what the individual may say about the issue..Democrats are on the left and they aren't coming back. Save your stamps and cel phone minutes..vote for conservatives.:banghead:
 
I've been wearing out my keyboard typing emails and letters to any politician in my state who will give me their ear. I did manage to get a phone call through to Senator Moran (R-KS) (well..one of his lackeys anyways...;) ) Good news on that front, he plans to oppose any AWB or further restrictions on guns. Have yet to hear back from the other Senator or my Congresscritters.
 
I emailed everyone from my state reps to US senators. My state reps are fairly to very conservative. My US Senators? :banghead: D-Cantwell and D-Murray, well I emailed them anyways...
 
I think we need to email as many reps as possible. I heard that Senator Graham (SC) was leaning toward a ban so I sent an email to him even though I don't live in South Carolina.
He responded with some due to large amount of contacts he is only able to respond to residents of SC.
What a joke........:cuss:
 
Just wrote my new rep, Sheila Jackson-Lee. Not hoping for much ("F" from the NRA for years), but we'll see...

Dear Congresswoman,

I am new to your district, becoming part of the 18th by the latest redistricting. I hope we get we the chance to meet soon. Do you have any plans for a town-hall or similar event in this new northern part of your district?

In the meantime, I'm writing to express my extreme dismay and disgust at the "gun control" proposals being discussed as the new congress gets underway. I know that community safety, particularly of our children, is a major concern of yours, which I applaud.

However, none of the ideas being put forth by Sen. Feinstein or Rep. McCarthy will accomplish a single thing towards the goal of safe neighborhoods. All they will do is give violent criminals easier targets, make non-violent felons out of thousands of your constituents, and cause mass chaos in the legal system.

There are many things we might do to address our deficient mental health system, for instance, that would have a more immediate impact without violating the rights of people who are not the problem anyway.

Please let me know that you will think carefully and keep facts as your guide rather than emotion and the urge to "do something" to address this complex area.

Respectfully,
Rich Pedersen
Spring
 
Wrote the president, both senators and my district's representative. I'm in Missouri and republicans have a super majority in the legislature so there shouldn't be any controls at the state level.

As far as the congresscritters are concerned we have 1 senator with a D from the NRA, though I think she knows she only won this past election due to the extreme stupidity of her opponent, it was looking like any republican was going to defeat her before the primary was over, then again 6 years until her next re-election so she might feel safe about voting for something thats unpopular in the state. The other senator and my rep are a bit more gun-friendly and as long as they haven't been flooded with way more anti messages will probably not vote for any other regs. I think we all know how futile my message to the president was.
 
I'm glad to see this one is starting to get longer and longer. The first day or so it was kind of sad how few were claiming they had done it.
 
My representative is E.F. Hutton and E.F. Hutton says---wait, I meant Alan Nunnalee. He's both a Mississippian and a Republican. I don't think I have to call him up to remind him. Like most Mississippians, he's already right thinkin'.

It's representatives from other states I should be calling...but they don't care if I'm not from their state. Pinheads.
 
Both Senators and my Congressman. Also upped my NRA membership to Endowment. We can't afford to loose this fight, I fear it's for the whole ball of wax.
 
To both my senators and my representative:

Dear ,

As your constituent, I am contacting you to express my opposition to any attempt to ban so-called “assault weapons” or “high-capacity” magazines. In my view, any further restrictions on the sale or possession of these items would clearly infringe our right to keep and bear arms as specified in the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.

The “assault weapon” of the late 18th Century was the Brown Bess Musket. It had many of the same characteristics as modern “assault weapons” in that it wasn’t particularly useful for hunting, but was militarily advantageous because it could be loaded and fired rapidly, and could mount a bayonet for close-quarters combat. It was, unarguably, the weapon our Founding Fathers had in mind when they wrote the Second Amendment, because keeping and bearing it encouraged proficiency in its use, and gave the musket-armed militiaman parity with regular army troops.

Today, keeping and bearing an AR-15 rifle encourages proficiency which is militarily useful in case of a national emergency, and the skilled possessor of an AR-15 rifle with military-specification magazines has a large degree of parity with hostile military forces of an invading foreign government or our own government turned tyrannical. Further restrictions on its sale and possession would clearly violate the Second Amendment and would be futile in any case, since existing weapons, if well maintained, can easily be expected to last for more than a century.

Please do everything in your power to defeat “feel good” legislation that would infringe on our Second Amendment rights. Your efforts will not be unappreciated at election time.

Sincerely,
 
I've contacted my reps, my Mayor, my Governor and the President. I've also re-joined the NRA and this forum, and have spoken up in social media (to the chagrin of quite a few 'friends' who have gone so far as to call NRA members directly implicit in the CT shooting.) I'm "all-in".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top