Who was the last pro-Second Amendment president?

Status
Not open for further replies.

SDDL-UP

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
265
Location
ID
Have we had a genuine Pro-gun, Pro-Second Amendment president in the last fourty years?


I'm not trying to be flippant with the question. I'm just astonished when I think about it... that in fourty years I don't know that we've had a president that really believes in your right to keep and bear arms. WOW!

Isn't it about time?
 
I'm certainly no history major, but I seem to recall that JFK was a firm believer.
 
Not sure where he stood on 2A issues, but the last president that overall "got it" was John Kennedy...

He made Khruschev (sp??) and Castro blink, and stand down. (Anyone else remember the early 60's 'Cuban Missle Crisis'?)
 
Yes, JFK. And it simply STUNS those who don't know any better when you spring the fact that he was an NRA Life Member (given him by the NRA as a gift) and wrote at least a couple letters that still exist lauding the NRA for it's efforts.

Reagan wasn't bad.

Don't know about Nixon--know he liked football.
 
James Madison?

That's what I was thinking. The founding fathers understood and set up the system of checks and balances. What is the incentive of congress, courts, and the president to preserve those checks against themselves? It is like the one thing they can agree on. I guess it takes someone who values the freedom and independence of America more than his own power.
 
Reagan signed the McClure-Volkimer bill (FOPA) which wasn't really that great.
Which did one minor bad thing (closed the NFA registry to new FA) and several REAL DAMN GOOD THINGS.

There's also some evidence that Regan didn't know about the NFA closure when he signed it since it was added in the middle of the night.

I'd say Regan was every bit if not more pro gun as JFK. Remember JFK picked LBJ to be his VP ... and LBJ was every bit as big a gun grabber as Schumer and Fienstein (you're judged by the company you keep).
 
Letter from President John F. Kennedy to the NRA
March 20, 1961

Dear Mr. Orth:

On the occasion of Patriots Day, I wish to offer my contgratulations and best wishes to the National Rifle Association of America which over the past years has done credit to our country by the outstanding achievements of its members in the art of shooting.

Through competitive matches and sports in coordination with the National Board for the Promotion of Rifle Practice, the Association fills an important role in our national defense effort, and fosters in an active and meaningful fashion the spirit of the Minutemen.

I am pleased to accept Life Membership in the National Rifle Association and extend to your organization every good wish for continued success.

Sincerely,

John Kennedy

See a scanned copy here. I have seen the picture of JFK with an AR-15/M16 in the Oval Office, but can't seem to track it down. Putting Kennedy's name into google along any mention of firearms just brings up waaaay to much assassination conspiracy BS to wade through.

Ronald Reagan, in 1980, was the first time the NRA formally endorsed a candidate for President. He was an NRA Life Member, stong supporter of the CMP(!), and was in general a pretty good guy for gun-rights.

But, both Bush I and II have been... lackluster. Clinton, of course, was the Grand Poobah that signed the AWB into law, and his White House fought pretty hard to get it through Congress too.
 
yeah, FOPA was actually pretty good.

I remember my dad having to fill out paperwork everytime hebought a brick of .22LR
 
I am going to go with Reagan because the FOPA would have never passes without the NFA close clause. We have to say he did much more good than harm.
 
My first thought was JFK, but if I did my math right, he died over 40 years ago. My next thought was Reagan, but I'm not sure if he supported the 2A beyond it meaning the right to hunt.
 
Nixon was NOT a friend of gun owners. He thought guns were "an abomination" and pushed for things like the DC gun ban. He didn't want his political opponents being armed.
 
Jerry Ford. Here's an excerpt from the Ford-Carter debates:

THE PRESIDENT. Mr. Maynard, the record of gun control, whether it's one city or another or in some States does not show that the registration of a gun, handgun, or the registration of the gun owner, has in any way whatsoever decreased the crime rate or the use of that gun in the committing of a crime. The record just doesn't prove that such legislation or action by a local city council is effective.

What we have to do -- and this is the crux of the matter -- is to make it very, very difficult for a person who uses a gun in the commission of a crime to stay out of jail. If we make the use of a gun in the commission of a crime a serious criminal offense, and that person is prosecuted, then in my opinion we are going after the person who uses the gun for the wrong reason. I don't believe in the registration of handguns or the registration of the handgun owner. That has not proven to be effective. And therefore, I think the better way is to go after the criminal, the individual who commits a crime in the possession of a gun and uses that gun for a part of his criminal activity.

Those are the people who ought to be in jail. And the only way to do it is to pass strong legislation so that once apprehended, indicted, convicted, they'll be in jail and off the streets and not using guns in the commission of a crime.

MR. MAYNARD. But Mr. President, don't you think that the proliferation of the availability of handguns contributes to the possibility of those crimes being committed? And, there's a second part to my follow-up. Very quickly, there are, as you know and as you've said, jurisdictions around the country with strong gun control laws. The police officials in those cities contend that if there were a national law to prevent other jurisdictions from providing the weapons that then came into places like New York, that they might have a better handle on the problem. Have you considered that in your analysis of the handgun proliferation problem?

THE PRESIDENT. Yes, I have, and the individuals with whom I have consulted have not convinced me that a national registration of handguns or handgun owners will solve the problem you are talking about. The person who wants to use a gun for an illegal purpose can get it whether it's registered or outlawed -- they will be obtained -- and they are the people who ought to go behind bars. You should not, in the process, penalize the legitimate handgun owner. And when you go through the process of registration, you, in effect, are penalizing that individual who uses his gun for a very legitimate purpose.
 
Reagan.

I certainly don't like screwing over a small amount of people to protect a MUCH larger number, which is what happened, but I have a feeling that had the FOPA not passed, things would currently be MUCH worse than they are.

Think you would be driving through NY or CA or Chicago with guns without the FOPA? Safe passge was a guarantee. Also included was legislation preventing feds from keeping a record of what people owned, which is why background checks must be destroyed after a day (or whatever the limit is).

Read the link of what it did.

As for actual enjoying shooting, probably Teddy Roosevelt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top