Yeah, but...
An Accu-Trigger Savage would probably undercut most Remchesterugers in price and shoot just as well if not better.
You can get a Remington 700 and easily adjust the stock trigger to something usable,
without having that Glock-like Accutrigger thingie sitting in there keeping the liability lawyers happy.
Truth is, Remington's Model 700 has been in production since the early 1960's. It's a fairly simple and well-established design that lends itself well to a variety of shooting disciplines, be they target guns, hunting guns, police sharpshooters, military snipers, you name it. That alone does something for name brand recognition. Too bad Remington themself didn't recognize it when they came out with the 710. They could've offered a stripped-down 700 ADL for the same price, or a smidgen more, than the ill-fated 710.
Winchester has hemmed and hawed with their Model 70, going from the vaunted and desirable pre-'64 action to the post-'64 push feed, then coming out again with their claw-extractor Controlled Round Feed version a few years ago. Now they have introduced a Controlled Round Push Feed version, because their Short Magnums don't feed quite right in the Push Feed versions.
Ruger's Model 77 has always been a stand-up, solid gun. But they're kind of the Dodge in a Ford/Chevy world, always working to get a greater market share. I've had a sour taste in my mouth from time spent with a Ruger Mini-14 and Mini-30, but I still have my Ruger #1 and 10/22. Potential Model 77 buyers may also be turned off by Bill Ruger Sr's political gaffe' concerning magazines of capacities greater than 10 rounds.