Why are pistol grips evil?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Every single cell in the Brady’s body is evil. So the obvious conclusion is her cellular structure is entirely composed of pistol grips.
 
Because politicians areretarded. They make guns easier to shoot, so they must be banned.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
According to the DOJ in the PRK this is why :rolleyes:

"It's really their killing potential," Alison Merrilees, legal counsel for the Firearms Division of the attorney general's office, said in explaining why assault weapons were banned. "The pistol grip allows them to be sprayed randomly. You can kill lots of people without having to reload."
 
Pistol grips didn't start out being evil, at first they were good, law abiding gun parts. Then they got to hanging around with those cursed barrel shrouds, and we all know how evil THEY are. Just ask Carolyn McCarthy. Well, it didn't take long til the pistol grips were robbing stores and killing old ladies too.

After awhile, the barrel shrouds got completely out of the petty crimes and had the pistol grips do their dirty work for them. Its gotten to where the barrel shrouds now just run the evil empire and shield themselves from the law with 4 or 5 layers of gun parts between them and the low level street crimes. The barrel shrouds make all the money and the pistol grips are left holding the bag.

Its just another case of trying to put a band-aid on a problem that you know you can't solve. They know the barrel shrouds are too powerful and well organized and cannot be stopped, so they go after the weaker, less organized pistol grips in order to give people the sense that they are doing something.
 
People can be evil. Maybe even a baboon could possibly be.

But how can a hunk of wood, plastic or metal be evil? Was the tree mistreated as a seedling or something? Or did the iron ore go mad because they dug it up? Oh I know, the plastic went bad when they molded it.

I swear, sometimes antis haven't got the brains of a fruit fly.
 
Pistol grips didn't start out being evil, at first they were good, law abiding gun parts. Then they got to hanging around with those cursed barrel shrouds, and we all know how evil THEY are. Just ask Carolyn McCarthy. Well, it didn't take long til the pistol grips were robbing stores and killing old ladies too.

After awhile, the barrel shrouds got completely out of the petty crimes and had the pistol grips do their dirty work for them. Its gotten to where the barrel shrouds now just run the evil empire and shield themselves from the law with 4 or 5 layers of gun parts between them and the low level street crimes. The barrel shrouds make all the money and the pistol grips are left holding the bag.

Its just another case of trying to put a band-aid on a problem that you know you can't solve. They know the barrel shrouds are too powerful and well organized and cannot be stopped, so they go after the weaker, less organized pistol grips in order to give people the sense that they are doing something.
You owe me a new keyboard. :D
 
According to the DOJ in the PRK this is why

"It's really their killing potential," Alison Merrilees, legal counsel for the Firearms Division of the attorney general's office, said in explaining why assault weapons were banned. "The pistol grip allows them to be sprayed randomly. You can kill lots of people without having to reload."
And these are the kind of people running this country. Sad.
 
Perhaps some graphical instruction is in order.


I would love to see a real life version of this with real Minis.
 

Attachments

  • Assault Weapon.GIF
    Assault Weapon.GIF
    13.5 KB · Views: 49
They also make it easier to keep the gun pointed on a target with one hand while reloading. That is why here in the People's Republic of California you can't have a pistol grip and a detachable magazine, it's one or the other.
 
Our national government decided that it was a bad idea for Americans to buy and own modern-style military rifles, especially those made in other countries. Americans do not need military weapons unless they are in the military. Military rifles are dangerous and intimidating, compared to little ole deer guns. But these same people did not want to ban hunting and hunting rifles. They decided that a pistol grip was one of the distinguishing features of a military rifle. There is nothing evil about a pistol grip, but it is one insignia of the evil military rifle. Others include removable mags holding more than ten rounds, flashhiders, fully automatic operation, and the capacity to take a bayonet. Today it is OK to buy an American military-style rifle but generally illegal to import them from abroad

Drakejake
 
I would love to see a real life version of this with real Minis.

gallery_260_23_2123.jpg


gallery_260_23_4275.jpg


gallery_260_23_11270.jpg


gallery_260_23_33326.jpg
 
Pistol grips are evil because they are cool; all fun things are
"bad."
I'm surprised my waistline didn't expand when I bought my Bushmaster M4gery they're so fun... Anything this fun must be fattening.
 
It amazes me how we let people who know nothing about guns write gun legislation.

Wake up!

People who know nothing about kids write legislation telling you how to raise them. People who know nothing about business write legislation regulating it. People who know nothing about dogs write legislation regulating them, sometimes ordering them to be killed en masse like in Denver. People who don't work for a living write legislation taxing those who do.

It's ALL the same.
 
A pistol grip is phallic and a gun is phallic by nature.

Phallic + Phallic = 2xPhallic

You can obviously see that the pistol grip doubles the effectiveness of a gun....and feminists hate phallic....and gun grabbers hate guns....sooooo a feminist gun grabber really hates guns with pistol grips.



...except for certain cases where a pistol grip can be uses as a male replacement.
 
Because ugly guns are evil,

and every pistol-gripped long gun I've ever seen is ugly. I'm talkin' bull horns on a Caddy ugly. Every pistol gripped rifle or shotgun I've seen has all the aesthetic sense of a weed whacker.

I think the AR15 is uglier than my M-44 Mosin-Nagant. The 'gant is a pretty ugly gun. OK, it's a very ugly gun. But it's cheap, and at least some part of it came from a tree.

The SKS is an ugly gun. The AK-47 is uglier. The SKS is cheaper. I'll take the SKS.

Even if I could buy one (and I should be able to), I wouldn't, because they're so ugly. Well, if they were as cheap as the 'gant, I might make an exception. Cheap has a beauty all its own.

--Shannon

<awaiting incoming flames...>
 
To be "fair," it's no doubt because they watched one-too-many Commando-type films where the hero kills a whole army by spraying an M-60 or something in their general direction. And given their short attention span, they've totally forgotten (or want to forget) that Hollywood-style "spray firing from the hip" pretty much originated on the old Rifleman program and a 100 year old Winchester lever action rifle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top