Why aren't we boycotting the BATFE concerning the DC Sniper Case?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wildalaska: When do people complain about the ATF going after bad guys? I am refering to actual bad guys, not some guy who made an innocent mistake.
They do it when they say things like, "I don't see anything on that list of press releases that couldn't be adequately handled by another law enforcement agency. Most, if not all of them could be handled by the local PD," or "The BATFE does not need more agents. It needs far fewer agents - zero would be ideal," etc, etc.

Also, I find it ironic this thread started with someone complaining about ATF NOT shutting Bulls-Eye down based on their records, yet then people start whining about the ATF enforcing "technical" violations. Had Bulls Eye been shut down based on those 200+ missing guns, and bad records that is the claim you'd be hearing instead. "ATF shut them down over a 'technical violation.'" It's ridiculous.
 
deej, exactly. Give the forensics equipment and techs and any decent investigators to the fbi. The A&T folks can go back to working under the same roof as the Secret Service.
Then write your Congressman and get it done. However, you show your ignorance of the Executive Branch by asking to send them back under the same roof as USSS. USSS is no longer a Treasury agency, they moved to DHS.

Also, despite your snide crack about "decent investigators," ATF has a little over 2000 great investigators. Now all you folks that don't want ATF to exist, have a problem with IRS-CI, DEA, etc, etc. Just remember if got rid of all those smaller agencies Congress set up and put them under the FBI, the Bureau would be about 5 or 6 times it's current size. I don't anyone (and not just the hardcore tinhatters) wants one "super" agency, with all that size and power.
 
The fact that the BATFE reigns in an occasional violent criminal is irrelevant
Not true, the stats show that when the ATF is aggressive in enforcing the law crime goes down. When they are lax on it crime goes up. A former agent wrote a book that details ATF's history and shows the figures over the decades.

Look into the Project Safe Neighborhoods programs, and some of the new violent crime task forces the ATF, other fed LE agencies, and the locals have formed in some major cities. The proof of their effectiveness is out there, and they do a lot more than just an "occasional" arrest of violent criminals.

The book is called "Very Special Agents" by James Moore. Although Moore overstates his case a little, and his constant bashing of the FBI gets old quick, he does back up his claims with documentation.
 
Graystar I think we are assuming that the 238 missing guns were merely "stolen". Think about it. Supposedly Malvo just strolls out of the back of the shop with a Bushmaster in his pants? Now that gun probably cost the store $500-$700. Now multiply that roughly by 238. Better yet lets assume on average most of those 238 guns cost $400, that would be $95,200. That is a lot of investment that just went missing. The more likely scenario is that those guns were getting paid for, they just weren't being tracked properly. Sure the two squirrels are responsible for their actions when they go on the shooting spree, but how did they get the guns? If a person is tasked with lawfully selling firearms, then they should be held accountable if they are not lawfully selling firearms. Otherwise, lets just let anyone at anytime buy a gun. There is a reason we don't want ex-cons to have the tools available to them to do what they did before. It is called the DC sniper shootings. Sure if they are motivated, they will find a weapon. However, what are the odds these two picked up a Bushmaster in Washington State with the intent of eventually shooting people in DC? I think in this particular case and in probably many cases, one could make the argument that their possession of a firearm eventually led to their committing murders with it.

Before you go off the deep end and compare the DC guys to regular joe citizens, you can't. I am talking about ex-cons; people that have already displayed a disregard for the law and an inability to operate lawfully within the bounds of society. Sure we can specify that they committed firearms crimes or crimes of violence. Muhammad had violated a federal restraining order by possessing a firearm. Malvo was 17 and an illegal immigrant. As much as some of us hate stupid gun laws, I don't think laws that prohibit felons and illegal immigrants from purchasing firearms are the end of the world. If we can take simple steps like the instant check to stop a few felons here and there from getting guns, I think it is worth it. More importantly, the laws stating felons can't possess firearms or ammunition are good when law enforcement find criminals up to no good and guess what, they have a firearm on them.

Anyway, we have drifted. What evidence do we have that the BATFE audited that gun store and did nothing about it? That is what I want to know. Maybe they did, maybe they didn't. Lets find out.
 
Ah the possible smoking gun. http://www.neahin.org/programs/schoolsafety/gunsafety/stbullseye.htm

Seattle Times
April 20, 2003

Errant Gun Dealer, Wary Agents
Paved Way for Beltway Sniper Tragedy
By Mike Carter, Steve Miletich and Justin Mayo
Seattle Times staff reporters

Gun dealer Brian Borgelt says he doesn't know how his store ended up arming the Beltway sniper suspects with a deadly accurate $1,600 military-style carbine.

But law-enforcement sources, for the first time, explain what happened: Not only did sniper suspect John Muhammad hone his marksmanship at Bull's Eye's firing range, but alleged accomplice Lee Boyd Malvo has told investigators he shoplifted the 35-inch-long carbine from the supposedly secure store.

The Bushmaster XM15 had been prominently displayed last summer at Bull's Eye. Next thing Borgelt knew, federal agents were swooping in, seeking the federal sales record that would show who bought the laser-scoped rifle.

Borgelt had no sales record. Nor could he produce records for scores of other missing guns.

Bull's Eye's negligent operation and the government's timid enforcement of errant gun dealers contributed to the tragedy, according to recently released documents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) and numerous interviews with current and former agency employees.

Long before last fall's sniper slayings, Bull's Eye was among a minuscule group of problem gun dealers that, willingly or not, "supply the suppliers" who funnel guns to the nation's criminals, the ATF says. Studies show about 1 percent of gun stores sell the weapons traced to 57 percent of gun crimes.

As a result, these few gun dealers have a vastly disproportionate impact on public safety.

In theory, such dealers cannot hide from enforcers. In the early 1990s, the ATF developed indicators, or red flags, that alerted it to gun dealers that might be illegally trafficking in guns.

Bull's Eye displayed every one of these indicators for years:

• Guns stolen from inventory.

• Missing federal sales records, needed by police to solve crimes.

• Having 10 weapons a year traced to crimes.

• Frequently selling multiple guns to individual buyers.

• Short times between gun sales and their involvement in crimes.

An analysis of records obtained by The Seattle Times through a freedom-of-information lawsuit against the ATF shows that between 1997 and 2001, guns sold by Bull's Eye were involved in 52 crimes, including homicides, kidnappings and assaults - a rate the ATF considers alarming.

"What you have in front of you is a case study in what is wrong with this system," said Jerry Nunziato, a former director of the ATF's National Tracing Center who reviewed Bull's Eye's 283-page file.

"This shop has all of the obvious indicators that something's wrong. When the bureau looked at it and found the problems were true, nothing was done."

Four inspections in five years

On average, the ATF looks at less than 4 percent of dealers in a year. But the agency inspected Borgelt's operation four times in five years - 1998, 2000, 2001 and 2002 - and cited it for violations at least 15 times.

"He had a lot of attention," said Richard Van Loan, the ATF regional director for industry operations in Seattle. "The guy wasn't ignored."

But Borgelt is open for business today, even though he can't account for 238 guns or say whether they were stolen, lost or sold, or if their buyers underwent felony-background checks.

Borgelt blames this problem on employees who didn't record sales, fill out required federal forms, or simply stole the guns.

With thousands of dollars in possible inventory thefts, he managed to thrive in an industry known for paper-thin profits. Federal prosecutors offer a possible explanation:

They allege that Borgelt hasn't filed personal or business federal tax returns for eight years, while making estimated tax payments of only $10,500. During this time he purchased his store's $350,000 building and a $400,000 house on American Lake in Lakewood, Pierce County.

Borgelt says he's done nothing illegal. He says he tried to get control of Bull's Eye's paperwork and inventory, but the store expanded too quickly, employees came and went, and he didn't get them to follow federal regulations.

"Yeah, these are excuses," he said during a lengthy interview. "But, dammit, these are my excuses."

Easy to get federal firearms license

Bull's Eye Shooter Supply - "The Biggest Little Gun Shop Around" - is a brick building a few blocks from the Tacoma Dome, with a two-story frieze of an African savanna populated by big game. Dominating the mural is a huge water buffalo bracketed in a telescopic sight, its crosshairs superimposed on the bull's left eye.

A customer today can walk into the sprawling shop and buy a Bushmaster XM15 semiautomatic carbine or just about any other legal gun of choice. Upstairs at the firing range, you can shoot pistols at one of 12 lanes while benefiting from such deals as "Mondays - Ladies Shoot Free!!" or "Children under 12 yrs. shoot FREE with an accompanying adult."

Borgelt, a fit, 38-year-old former Army Ranger, got his first federal firearms license in 1986. It was easier than obtaining a driver's license. He had to fill out and sign a form swearing that he was over 21, didn't have a felony record, give a business address - home or apartment sufficed - then pay the license fee: $10.

At the time, there were more than 250,000 licensed gun dealers in America, about half of them not doing any retail business at all. Instead, they were doing what Army Staff Sgt. Brian Borgelt was doing, using the license to get inexpensive weapons for himself and his buddies in the 2nd Ranger Battalion at Ft. Lewis.

He called his business Pacific Shooters Supply and ran it out of his Tacoma home, quietly at first.

The first visit from ATF

In November 1994, ATF inspector Eric Younger, unannounced, knocked on Borgelt's door to ask about the sale of an AK-47-style assault rifle at a Yakima gun show.

The assault rifle was part of a criminal investigation, and Younger was tracing its owners.

No one answered, but Younger found a note saying Pacific was now closed and referred customers to Bull's Eye Shooter Supply. Borgelt had become a partner in Bull's Eye with Charles N. Carr, an Army buddy who's now a police officer in Bridgeport, Conn.

Suddenly, Younger had another issue to check with Borgelt - whether he had turned in Pacific's license.

Younger still had to trace the assault rifle, a cumbersome process. There is no registry or centralized filing system to trace guns as there is with cars. If a getaway car is found after a bank robbery, police can quickly use its license plate or its vehicle ID plate (in plain sight on the dashboard) to determine its current owner and begin investigating the crime.

And unlike cars, guns aren't registered. To track a suspicious weapon, the ATF must first send its serial number to the manufacturer to learn to which licensed dealer the gun had been sold. The ATF then assigns its closest field office to contact the dealer, review the federal sales form and find out who bought the weapon.

During its investigation, the ATF learned the Yakima assault rifle was owned by a woman who told agents that she had purchased it at a gun show from a dealer named Brian Borgelt.

Individuals selling guns at gun shows do not have to document the sale or do a background check on the buyer. But dealers at gun shows, by law, must.

When Younger asked him about the rifle, Borgelt denied ever owning it.

The inspector doubted him, though, since Younger had also located the man who sold the rifle to Borgelt - at another gun show - as well as the woman who bought it.

Younger also confronted Borgelt over his individual dealer's license, which the law said he should have surrendered when he joined in with a partner and opened Bull's Eye. The partnership was required to have a separate license and pay the fee, now $200.

Penalty: only a note in ATF file

The ATF inspector later wrote up Borgelt for not recording the gun-show sale and for improperly mailing in felony background-check forms.

Younger had to decide how to punish Borgelt for breaking the law. If Borgelt's violations had occurred a decade earlier, he might have been charged with a felony. The 1968 Gun Control Act, which Congress passed in wake of the assassinations of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., set standards for gun dealers. They had to maintain sales records so police could trace crime guns, refuse to sell to felons or minors, and follow other safeguards.

Since then, Congress loosened certain gun-control provisions. In 1986, President Reagan signed the Firearm Owner's Protection Act, a law pushed by the gun lobby, which reduced most record-keeping violations to misdemeanors and required that the ATF prove that dealers "willfully" violated the law before revoking their licenses.

Also, ATF could inspect dealers only once in 12 months unless it had evidence of a crime.

In Bull's Eye's ATF file, Younger noted to future inspectors that when they visited Borgelt again "any subsequent violations of these specific regulations should not be found upon inspection at his new business."

That was the extent of the punishment.

Inspectors returned to Bull's Eye in 1998. Under the Clinton administration, the ATF began focusing inspections on dealers that showed warning signs of sloppy operation or misconduct.

That year, the ATF ordered inspections of the 87 licensed gun sellers that had reported four or more stolen or missing guns in the previous three years. While it wasn't the worst offender, Bull's Eye was the only one in Washington state. It had reported eight.

ATF sent another inspector, Clinton Bonney, to conduct the audit. He found that the dealer couldn't produce federal sales records for four guns no longer at the store, records show. Even so, he noted for the file that Bull's Eye had "very complete and accurate records."

Borgelt said Bonney's praise may have led him to drop his guard.

He and his employees were supposed to log each new gun acquisition and sale in a ledger, fill out a federal firearms-transfer form, and note results of background checks.

Whether deliberate or not, Borgelt let the filing fall apart.

Most dealers go many years without being inspected again. But ATF inspectors were back at Bull's Eye in June 2000.

"We just weren't taking a shot in the dark," the ATF's Van Loan said. "There were indicators that we needed to take a look at it."

Spike in crime guns, other red flags

In fact, the number of crime guns traced back to Bull's Eye had been growing from three in 1997 to 10 in 1998, 18 in 1999, and 11 in 2000.

This likely sparked the ATF's scrutiny, said Joseph Vince, former chief of the ATF's Crime Gun Analysis Branch and partner in Crime Gun Solutions, a Frederick, Va., consulting firm. "There's a spike in crime guns. Something wasn't right."

Several of the weapons traced back to Bull's Eye were associated with violent crimes, including one of Washington's most heinous mass murders, the Trang Dai Cafe killings in Tacoma.

On July 5, 1998, four gunmen burst into the Tacoma restaurant and opened fire, killing five diners and wounding five others. Detectives blamed it on warring Asian gangs. When Tacoma police searched the home of one of the suspects, they found an AK-style assault rifle that matched the caliber of one of the murder guns, although it had not been used in the killings. Bull's Eye had sold it three months earlier.

Bull's Eye displayed two other red flags.

Between 1997 and 2000, Bull's Eye had sold 663 guns to 265 individual buyers - sometimes as many as 10 guns at a time, ATF records show.

Vince said these were a remarkable number of "multiple firearms sales" and an indicator that buyers might be reselling the weapons on the street.

Felons are barred from buying guns from retail dealers, so they either have to buy them from individuals, steal them, or employ "straw buyers" with clean records to purchase the guns for them.

If guns from a particular dealer quickly and frequently are used in crimes or possessed by criminals, the ATF gets suspicious.

The ATF's median "time to crime" for traced weapons - from time of purchase to recovery by police - is about 6-1/2 years. A dealer with many weapons with a "time to crime" under three years raises a red flag for the ATF, which may assign inspectors to take a look.

Seventy percent of Bull's Eye's traced crime guns fell under the three-year time to crime - clearly of concern to the ATF, according to a Times analysis of the 52 traces of Bull's Eye-supplied guns between 1997 to 2001. So it was not surprising that inspector John Dimond and others began a compliance audit of Bull's Eye, starting in May 2000.

Dimond quickly determined that Borgelt was unable to account for 421 guns - nearly a quarter of his inventory, ATF records show. Other firearms dealers say this is a staggering number. A dealer typically might have missing records for only a couple of gun sales over many years.

Dimond's routine 8-hour audit turned into a major review with several inspectors working 186 hours at the Tacoma gun store over two months.
 
Lax reporting of thefts, other violations

Borgelt was cited for nine record-keeping violations.

Then the ATF took one of the toughest actions it can use against a dealer, short of revocation: It ordered Borgelt to appear at a warning conference.

"The significance of the violations found at your premises raises a serious question as to your willingness and / or ability to conduct business in accordance with laws and regulations," an ATF official wrote in a July 2000 letter to Borgelt. "As a result, we are contemplating the revocation of your Federal Firearms License."

At the August conference, Borgelt promised to clean up his books and said he planned to computerize his inventory records. He assured the ATF that no more violations would occur.

In the meantime, he had found records or proved sales for 201 of the unaccounted-for guns, bringing the tally of the missing weapons down to 220 and finally, a year later, to 160.

Federal law requires that a dealer must report a missing or stolen gun to the ATF and local police within 48 hours of the discovery of its disappearance.

It took him a year to file the report with ATF, claiming he was still trying to find the guns.

He never did file one with Tacoma police. Borgelt blamed an employee for the lapse.

Former employees of Bull's Eye said that during their time there things were run by the book. "I always saw the paperwork done correctly," said Carl Shanks, an employee in 1997 and 1998 who is now a sheriff's deputy for Pierce County.

Again, the ATF had to weigh Borgelt's punishment.

In a follow-up letter Aug. 31, 2000, an ATF supervisor told Borgelt that future violations would be viewed as "willful in nature and may result in revocation of your license." ATF planned to inspect him again "to ensure your compliance."

ATF authority shackled by Congress

Despite Bull's Eye's history of breaking the rules, ATF did not revoke his license. The warning letter the agency sent Borgelt was its only other option; Congress has never given the ATF the authority to suspend or fine an errant gun dealer.

ATF also chose not to refer the violations to prosecutors. Federal prosecutors are reluctant to bring misdemeanors to court when there are more serious felony crimes to pursue.

And felony charges against a gun dealer are even rarer because prosecutors must show the dealer willfully violated the law, a difficult burden to prove.

Further, the ATF considered Bull's Eye's 2000 meltdown as its first major offense, said Van Loan of the Seattle ATF office. Borgelt was given a chance to fix problems. "It was a judgment call at that time," Van Loan said.

Weighing heavily, he said, was that Borgelt and his 14 employees would lose their livelihoods if the ATF went through the time-consuming process of pulling its license. "Revocation is forever," Van Loan said.

Borgelt did make improvements, which were noted in a July 2001 follow-up inspection. But Van Loan said that, in retrospect, the audit had problems. It was conducted by a new inspector and could have been more thorough.

Also, Van Loan said a serious lapse was failing to bring Borgelt's misconduct to the attention of top officials in the Seattle ATF office.

At the same time, the ATF was shifting focus to explosives and terrorism, the result of the December 1999 arrest of Ahmed Ressam, the Algerian terrorist caught coming into Washington with a trunkload of explosives.

"If we hadn't been distracted, we would have been down there and I think we would have found something," Van Loan said of Borgelt. "... He got past us in 2001."

The ATF cited Borgelt for two record violations in 2001. And he was allowed to keep selling guns.

Missing gun tied to sniper shootings

In October 2002, sniper suspects John Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo were arrested outside Washington, D.C., following 23 days of terror that left 10 dead and three wounded. Police found the Bushmaster rifle in the trunk of their blue Chevrolet Caprice.

The ATF's National Tracing Center quickly determined the gun had been sold by the manufacturer to Bull's Eye in July 2002.

When FBI and ATF agents descended on his store, Borgelt recalled, there was a long silence when he told agents his records showed the gun was still on the shelf.

Borgelt's claim that he never knew the gun was missing has been met with incredulity. The expensive weapon, fitted with exotic accessories, had been prominently displayed.

"It would be like being a car dealer and having a Cadillac disappear from the sales floor without anybody noticing," said Vince, the former ATF official.

The missing paperwork on the sniper rifle prompted yet another audit by the ATF, which determined that another 78 firearms from the shop could not be accounted for.

Former ATF supervisors say Borgelt's federal license should have been revoked after the disastrous 2000 audit.

"He's a poster boy for gun control," said William Vizzard, a retired ATF supervisor and California State University, Sacramento, criminal-justice professor who wrote "In the Crossfire: A Political History of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms."

"But it doesn't surprise me he's still in business. The agency is always conservative, because they're afraid. They have no backing in Congress or this administration."

The ATF has been "kicked around" by the National Rifle Association for so long, Vizzard said, that it shies away from confrontations that might attract NRA's ire.

Art Gordon, a 27-year ATF veteran in Baltimore, helped investigate the Beltway sniper slayings.

"For years, ATF got beat into the ground by the NRA and got gun-shy," said Gordon, speaking as president of the ATF branch of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association. "They are leery of being aggressive on federal firearms licenses."

Revocations take time. Dealers can appeal while staying in business. The 1986 law also gave gun dealers the right to go before a federal judge and review the entire matter all over again. Usually, a federal agency's administrative actions can only be reversed when the other party can show the government acted arbitrarily.

The bureau is also hamstrung by a lack of resources. In 2000, the agency had 440 compliance inspectors responsible for overseeing not only the 83,000 federal firearms licensees, but also hundreds of explosives manufacturers and dealers and thousands of liquor and cigarette manufacturers and distributors.

All these hurdles have made ATF reluctant to revoke licenses except in the most serious cases, said Kristen Rand, legislative director for the Violence Policy Center in Washington, D.C., which tracks firearms policy.

"Dealers understand that," Rand said. "You really have to do something egregious and outrageous to initiate revocation proceedings."

In 1999, the ATF revoked just 20 firearms licenses.

The sniper killings may have finally tipped those scales against Borgelt.

ATF investigators have asked the U.S. Attorney's Office in Seattle to file a rare felony charge against the gun dealer for willful disregard of gun laws, said a source who spoke on the condition of anonymity. No charges have been filed.

Borgelt's lawyer, James Frush, says there are no grounds for criminal charges. His client is only guilty of being a sloppy businessman, Frush says, and was given bad advice by the ATF on how to keep records.

As for his tax returns, Borgelt says any money owed has been paid and an accountant is getting his tax forms in order.

Meanwhile, he says he may just stop being a gun dealer, sell his store and concentrate instead on running his pistol range.

"I've given it my best go," he said. "But it's grown exponentially into something I can't chew."

************************************************************
Very interesting article. I am going to listen to you guys first and comment later.
 
Information Overload!

Another interesting article. Hopefully most of you can see through the blatant bias to a few of the valid points.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0301.kendall.html

License to Kill
How the GOP helped John Allen Muhammad get a sniper rifle.

By Brent Kendall
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bull's Eye Shooter Supply is a warehouse-sized gun store near the waterfront in Tacoma, Wash. Boasting the Puget Sound's largest selection of firearms and ammunition, the store is a mecca for area sportsmen, who come to browse the latest hunting rifles or practice their marksmanship at the store's 12-lane shooting range. An outside wall of the store bears a hand-painted mural depicting lions, elephants, cheetahs, and water buffaloes. Some of the store's firearms, however, have felled more than big game.
One such gun was a .223-caliber semiautomatic Bushmaster XM15 rifle, which Bull's Eye received from the manufacturer on July 2 of last year. On Sept. 21, a bullet from that gun blew through the back of a liquor store manager in Montgomery, Ala. (she died in the emergency room soon after). Two days later, another bullet burrowed through the head of a beauty store manager in Baton Rouge, La., who died instantly. Between Oct. 2-3, bullets from the gun ripped through the bodies of six people in Montgomery County, Md., killing all of them. Over the next three weeks, the gun claimed seven more victims--including a bus driver, a female FBI analyst, and a 13-year-old schoolboy--killing four of them. Finally, on Oct. 24, law enforcement authorities found the Bushmaster in the back seat of a blue Chevy Caprice occupied by John Allen Muhammad and John Lee Malvo.

Exactly how the gun got into the men's hands remains something of a mystery. Muhammad was banned by federal law from purchasing any gun because of a restraining order obtained by his ex-wife; his ineligibility would have shown up during the Brady background check that gun stores are required to run on potential buyers. Malvo was ineligible because he was a juvenile and an illegal immigrant. Bull's Eye has no record of selling the weapon, much less conducting a background check on Muhammad or Malvo for it. Bull's Eye employees have reported seeing Malvo at the store this summer, and later noticed the Bushmaster was not in its display case. But the store did not file the federally required theft report. When the store's owner, Brian Borgelt, was questioned by agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF), the federal agency charged with enforcing the nation's gun laws, he claimed not to have known the gun was missing until authorities traced it back to his store. Two weeks after the sniper suspects' arrests, he filed the theft report with the police and ATF.

This wasn't the first time that Bull's Eye was caught unable to account for deadly firearms that had passed through its doors. ATF inspectors, armed with data showing that weapons used in crimes had originated from Borgelt's store, audited it three times between 1998 and 2001, and found record-keeping irregularities each time. An audit in 2000 revealed that Borgelt could not account, through sales records, for 160 guns. Being unable to account for the whereabouts of even one-fifth that many weapons would be alarming, according to former ATF agents, even for a store the size of Bull's Eye. Moreover, Borgelt hadn't filed personal income tax returns since 1995 and hadn't filed some business tax forms since 1994--this despite $1.5 million in store bank deposits.

Yet despite all the warning signs, ATF didn't shut the store down. It didn't suspend Bull's Eye's license, or put it on probation. It didn't even administer a fine--not one $5 ticket to let the store know that the bureau meant business. Two years later, a $1,600 sniper rifle seems to have disappeared from the store like a pack of M&Ms from a convenience mart, surfacing 3,000 miles away in one of the biggest killing sprees in American history--oh, and one more thing: Bull's Eye is still open for business.

In the wake of September 11, the CIA, FBI, and INS have all been picked apart for failing to act on information that might have prevented the terrorist attacks. So far, there has been no similar call for investigating ATF, even though experts worry that Muhammad--a member of the Nation of Islam who reportedly considered America a terrorist state--may inspire al Qaeda or other terrorist groups to conduct similar attacks with easily obtained sniper rifles.

But there's a reason you won't see anyone investigating ATF: Its failings are the direct result of actions by the Republican politicians who now control both houses of Congress. At the behest of the National Rifle Association (NRA), GOP lawmakers (and some conservative Democrats) have saddled the bureau with so many legal restrictions that it has little practical power to deter sellers from allowing weapons to flow to criminals. ATF could have cracked down harder on Bull's Eye, but its lack of aggressiveness was precisely what GOP lawmakers had intended. Pro-gun-control Democrats could have made an issue last fall of how Muhammad obtained a sniper rifle, but they remained silent in the face of feared retribution at the polls by the NRA. Now, as the minority party, Democrats have little power to investigate anything, even if they wanted to.

Convenient Lack of Suspicion

Every year, more than 200,000 guns used in crimes are traced back to licensed gun dealers like Bull's Eye. Some are originally purchased by law-abiding citizens and later stolen. Others get sold (inadvertently) by dealers to "straw purchasers" who don't have criminal records but are acting as fronts for criminals. In many other cases, however, gun dealers eager to make an extra buck simply sell firearms to anyone who wants them, skipping background checks and falsifying paperwork to cover their tracks.

Of the 83,000 retail firearms dealers in America, ATF shuts down only about 25 annually. These are the most egregious wrongdoers, dealers caught red-handed fencing stolen weapons or openly selling large numbers of firearms to criminals. Yet these few cases account for only a fraction of the guns that flow to criminals from licensed dealers. The bigger problem stems from hundreds of other dealers who, through laziness, sloppy inventory control, convenient lack of suspicion, or under-the-table shenanigans, wind up arming criminals.

It is these dealers that ATF has virtually no power to control. Though it can shut a dealer down permanently--a fitting punishment only in egregious cases--ATF has no power to temporarily suspend a dealer's license, or impose a fine--steps that might remind a dealer to be vigilant about sales rules. Nor can it audit a gun dealer more than once a year, a rule that assures crooked dealers 364 days to do uninterrupted business. And because of dubious judicial precedent, the bureau's agents can't get a dealer charged with selling to a felon by going undercover and posing as felons.

Worse still, from a law-enforcement perspective, is the fact that federal law treats all record-keeping errors by gun dealers as, at most, misdemeanors--even in cases where ATF can prove that a dealer falsified records. This makes it practically impossible to bring gun dealers to court for record-keeping violations, since federal prosecutors, already burdened with more felony cases than they can litigate, usually don't accept misdemeanor referrals.

You'll be hard pressed to find another federal agency that, charged with enforcing laws dealing with legal but potentially dangerous products, must operate under similar handicaps. The Drug Enforcement Administration, which monitors the illegal diversion of prescription drugs, can pursue felony charges against a pharmacy for record-keeping problems; temporarily suspend the license of a problematic pharmacy; and when it has evidence of wrongdoing, mount an undercover approach to determine if a doctor is writing bogus prescriptions or if a pharmacist is illegally dispensing controlled substances. Even the Department of Agriculture, which is notoriously emasculated when it comes to enforcing federal standards, can, after a major food poisoning incident, temporarily stop production at an unsanitary meat packing plant, fine the plant, and re-visit for a new round of inspections in six months.

Reagan's Political Trifecta

Washington has been trying to keep deadly weapons out of criminal hands for almost seven decades. In 1934, alarmed by the violence of organized criminals like Al Capone, Congress passed the nation's first gun-control law, which gave the Treasury Department the power to tax and require owner registration of "gangster-type weapons." In 1938, it passed another measure requiring gun manufacturers and dealers to obtain federal licenses and banning the sale of firearms to known criminals. Thirty years later, in response to rising crime rates and the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr., the federal government clamped down further with passage of the 1968 Gun Control Act. Among other things, this law mandated that sellers keep transaction records and prohibited felons, illegal aliens, and a few other categories of people from buying or possessing firearms. In 1972, Treasury designated ATF as a separate agency in the department.

The NRA vehemently opposed the 1968 legislation, which marked the beginning of the association's transformation from its more traditional focus on training sportsmen in gun safety into the anti-enforcement, lobbying superpower we know today. Since 1968, the association has increasingly devoted more resources to waging political fights, and has constantly lobbied to minimize the power of ATF, often breathing fire when speaking of it. During the 1970s as ATF stepped up its policing of gun dealers, the NRA fought back, portraying ATF agents as "jack-booted fascists" and arguing that efforts targeting gun stores and their customers were nothing more than harassment. After all, the NRA argued, criminals don't get their guns from gun stores; they steal them from law-abiding gun-owners.

At the end of the decade, the NRA found a big friend in Ronald Reagan. By being anti-ATF and supporting gun dealers, Reagan could demonstrate that he was pro-gun, pro-small business, and anti-federal regulation--the perfect trifecta for a conservative Republican. The Gipper promised to eliminate ATF, and once in office he moved to make the pledge good. When the NRA reversed its position, fearing that a proposed merger with the Secret Service would make federal firearms authority politically untouchable, Reagan backed the NRA in substituting deregulation for reorganization, signing the 1986 Firearms Owners' Protection Act, which significantly curtailed ATF's enforcement powers against the firearms industry. The law limited the number of times ATF could conduct a compliance audit on a gun dealer to once a year. More importantly, it reduced all record-keeping violations--no matter whether there was one violation or a thousand, and no matter if records were falsified--to misdemeanors, thus entirely removing the threat that ATF could pursue felony charges against dealers flouting record-keeping laws and selling guns to prohibited persons under the table.

Gunning for Reform

Bill Clinton's election began to change the landscape in two ways. First, in 1993 the administration passed, against stiff GOP opposition, the Brady law, which required gun dealers to run background checks on all buyers. The next year, it pushed through Congress legislation banning most new assault-style weapons and prohibiting juveniles from possessing handguns. The NRA responded by declaring war on the president and the Democratic Party. The Democrats lost their majorities in both houses of Congress that year; most political experts credit NRA campaign efforts with several key GOP victories.

By 1995, however, the Brady law was beginning to show results. In its first year, it had blocked 40,000 attempts to purchase firearms by criminals, juveniles, and other prohibited persons--evidence that in fact many criminals were looking to gun stores for their firepower. Beginning the next year, the Clinton administration directed ATF to work with local law enforcement to expand the tracing of guns recovered by police, and to invest in new tracing technologies. As a result, ATF discovered that tens of thousands of crime guns actually flowed from licensed retail dealers and pawnbrokers to the streets. Moreover, most of the guns flowed primarily from a small minority of dealers--just 1.2 percent of dealers accounted for 57 percent of those crime gun tracings (ATF shuts down only about one in 40 of these per year).

Believe it or not, these were stunning discoveries, and they demonstrably proved that, despite decades of NRA propaganda, gun stores do play a major role in supplying criminals with guns.

Responding to the information, the White House won big increases in ATF's enforcement and inspector ranks. But to really deter licensed sellers from violating federal laws--as opposed to just arresting them after guns hit the streets--ATF needed powers to encourage compliance: the ability to levy fines, suspend licenses, audit when necessary, and charge dealers with felony record-keeping violations when appropriate. The Clinton administration and a few lone voices in Congress, especially Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), pushed legislation to give ATF this new authority while also requiring background checks at gun shows.

A string of high-school shootings, which peaked with the catastrophe at Columbine High School, gave the legislation enough momentum to narrowly pass the Senate in 1999, with Vice President Al Gore providing a tie-breaking vote. The House passed a weaker version of the Senate bill, and the measure died when efforts to reconcile the two versions went nowhere. Gore's highly publicized vote, according to many political analyses, was a major factor in his loss of West Virginia's five electoral votes in the 2000 election.

In theory, the sniper shootings should have been an occasion to raise again the issue of ATF's limited enforcement powers against dealers supplying criminals with guns. But while debates have raged about whether congressionally imposed restraints on the CIA and the FBI contributed to those agencies' failures to foresee impending terrorist activity, few have asked about similar restraints that might have kept ATF from preventing the terror on the East Coast--even if it had usable information. And it's pretty obvious why. Republicans, as the architects of the current regulatory system, are directly responsible for ATF's limited powers. Democrats, still smarting from the drubbings they took in 1994 and 2000, are understandably nervous about stirring up the gun issue, even though the sniper shootings happened in the thick of an election cycle and captured nationwide attention.

Other than in a few scattered newspaper editorials, the issue of ATF enforcement has stayed off the public radar screen. By and large, people have little clue just what the laws are, and they have no idea how toothless ATF is when it comes to policing gun dealers. Even government lawyers don't know how hamstrung the bureau is. "I've sat in rooms of federal prosecutors--career prosecutors--and ATF people are explaining to them, 'This is the way firearms commerce is governed,'" says David Kennedy, a senior researcher in criminal justice policy at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, "and the prosecutors don't believe them. It's surreal."

Had ATF been vested with sensible enforcement powers, the world might never have heard of John Allen Muhammad or John Lee Malvo. Had a few political fights turned out differently, the bureau would have been able to fine Bull's Eye for its previous violations, suspend its operations, or pursue felony record-keeping charges. Had the NRA and GOP not worked together to cripple the federal government's ability to enforce gun laws, bullets from that Bushmaster rifle might not have ended the lives of 10 people along the Interstate 95 corridor. Yet despite the dead, the wounded, and the terrified, little has changed politically. If horrors such as these can't spark public scrutiny and political outrage, it's hard to understand what will.



Brent Kendall is a Washington Monthly editorial assistant.
 
So which is it, ATF is too lax on "technical" violations, or too tough? :rolleyes:

Can't have it both ways, if ATF had more aggressively pursued the Bulls-Eye violations prior to the sniper case everyone would be screaming that they were JBTs, needlessly harrassing gun shop over paperwork problems. After the sniper case ATF is now accused of not doing enough.

The truth is they took a reasonable approach, and tried to get Bulls-Eye into compliance. However, why worry about the truth when there is a chance to bash the ATF? :rolleyes:
 
OK just a rant here....

Bulleseye and all the other "sloppy" dealers, gun show bandits that skirt the law with paperwork, or even guys I see over and over at GunShows with tables of guns AND NO FFLS really frost my butt.

We sell more guns thatn anyone in Alaska. I sell more guns on the net in a week thatn some shops sell in a month. We get em in 15-50 at a time and,ship em out just as fast.

We audit our paperwork EVERY MONTH....EVERY MONTH!!!!! We have two FFLS and a tax stamp. We are obligated to keep a separate dealer books, class 3 books, manufactureres book and gunsmith book as well as our internal records. We spend hours on paperwork...hours and hours and hours and hours

In the 8 years I have been here, I have had 6 crime traces. 6! If they audit our books, the only complaint they will have is the fact that some people, including me, have handwriting that would get one a beating in Catholic Scholl.

I have NO toleration for dealers who skirt the law, keep bad records or generally give gun delaers a bad name.

WildrantfinishedAlaska
 
WA, I commend you on doing your job well, despite the juggernaut of redundant paperwork.

BTW, having spent 12 years in Catholic School I can attest that even some decent handwriting will win the rath of the nuns. :what: ;)
 
DMF said:
Not true, the stats show that when the ATF is aggressive in enforcing the law crime goes down. When they are lax on it crime goes up. A former agent wrote a book that details ATF's history and shows the figures over the decades.
Stipulated, and irrelevant. The BATFE enforces immoral and unnecessary laws. The fact that by doing so, they may prevent crime, is immaterial.

I'm sure that a lot of crimes would be prevented if the cops made mandantory home visits and inspections twice a year, but the ends would not justify the means.

DMF said:
Now all you folks that don't want ATF to exist, have a problem with IRS-CI, DEA, etc, etc. Just remember if got rid of all those smaller agencies Congress set up and put them under the FBI, the Bureau would be about 5 or 6 times it's current size.
Speaking only for myself, I don't want the ATF, IRS, DEA functions to be rolled into the FBI. I want the agencies in question to be disbanded, totally and permanantly, and have the code that they enforce removed from the books. Just a minor clarification. :D

- Chris
 
Not true, the stats show that when the ATF is aggressive in enforcing the law crime goes down. When they are lax on it crime goes up. A former agent wrote a book that details ATF's history and shows the figures over the decades.
Stipulated, and irrelevant. The BATFE enforces immoral and unnecessary laws. The fact that by doing so, they may prevent crime, is immaterial.

I'm sure that a lot of crimes would be prevented if the cops made mandantory home visits and inspections twice a year, but the ends would not justify the means.
Well obviously you're not paying attention, the audit function is separate from Criminal Investigations. While audits do generate a few criminal cases, that is not even a large minority of ATF crim cases. So your crack about mandatory visits and inspections twice a year is irrelevant.

Hell the twice a year crack is total BS. Reference the FoxNews article I linked and quoted earlier, which shows ATF is so undermanned the Inspectors can't even reach their goal of auditing licensed dealers every three years.

As for getting rid of ATF, IRS, and DEA, write your Congressman, vote, or even run for Congress. If people want that kind of stuff to happen they need to quit obsessing about swift boats and ANG memos, and worry about who they elect to Congress. ;)
 
on the plus side, the Bull's Eye is now remodeled, very neat and tidy, and a well run shop with good prices and a (mostly) friendly and helpful staff. unlike before. there's only one guy there i don't care to deal with, but the rest of them are very nice and knowledgeable. i still am not crazy about their range's backstop. its a bunch of angled metal slats that has a tendancy to spit pieces of bullets back at you and the acoustics are terrible. i shoot elsewhere but i've purchased a few guns from them and its been a good experience each time. the new owner runs a tight ship and i enjoy going there now. they don't even mind it when i go in and looky-loo.

overall, i think it was a good thing that the Bull's Eye got busted and changed hands. losing 200+ guns is a black eye for the firearms community and industry. as a consumer, its a really good thing as the shop is now ten times more pleasant to go to and shop and purchase.

Bobby
 
How do you "boycott" a Federal Agency?

Actually, it is just that easy for an armed society to boycott the ENTIRE federal government, should they do anything so heinous as to require in responce lethal force.

Just a little reminder, not to give up your 'tools of last resort for gov't boycott' ever, for any reason.
 
The more likely scenario is that those guns were getting paid for
You’re speculating. Nothing good comes of that. All we know is that the guns are missing and that’s it.
If a person is tasked with lawfully selling firearms, then they should be held accountable if they are not lawfully selling firearms.
Okay. Give him the fine for not keeping the paperwork in order. I don’t see how that makes the gun shop owner responsible for the crime.
I think in this particular case and in probably many cases, one could make the argument that their possession of a firearm eventually led to their committing murders with it.
There you go, blaming the gun again. “The gun made them do it.†“Those poor souls under the influence of that big bad gun!â€

I would never compare those two to the average citizen. That’s not my point. My point is that you’re blaming the gun shop for criminal activity. That is wrong. Criminal activity occurs because criminals want to commit crimes. Not because they happen to have a gun in their hands. It’s wrong to have restrictions and requirements on the selling of guns when none of those restrictions and requirements have been proven to have any effect. In fact, we know from the CDC report that they DON’T have effect!
with a deadly accurate $1,600 military-style carbine.
â€Deadly Accurate?†And that’s different from the type of accuracy that other guns have?
 
deej, exactly. Give the forensics equipment and techs and any decent investigators to the fbi. The A&T folks can go back to working under the same roof as the Secret Service.
Then write your Congressman and get it done. However, you show your ignorance of the Executive Branch by asking to send them back under the same roof as USSS. USSS is no longer a Treasury agency, they moved to DHS.
I didn't realize that. Thanks. Write Congress? Please... I write congress regularly, but asking them to disband the ATF is a bit premature when they won't even repeal the 1968 GCA. When the GCA gets repealed, then I'll start writing them about disbanding the BATFE and repealing the NFA.
Also, despite your snide crack about "decent investigators," ATF has a little over 2000 great investigators. Now all you folks that don't want ATF to exist, have a problem with IRS-CI, DEA, etc, etc. Just remember if got rid of all those smaller agencies Congress set up and put them under the FBI, the Bureau would be about 5 or 6 times it's current size. I don't anyone (and not just the hardcore tinhatters) wants one "super" agency, with all that size and power.
I wasn't trying to be snide. I was simply suggesting that worthless investigators, namely those that go around checking for record-keeping violations, should not be transferred.

The DEA is another matter, and rather than hijack the thread by ranting about drug laws, I'll let that drop. :)
 
I wasn't trying to be snide. I was simply suggesting that worthless investigators, namely those that go around checking for record-keeping violations, should not be transferred.
Again, Inspectors are NOT criminal investigators. The inspectors do the audits and check to make sure the record keeping is done properly. An important function, but NOT criminal investigations. The Special Agents do the criminal investigations, and do not go around checking records. Feel free to run a search for my username and ATF, I have posted links to stories about the real investigations that ATF does.

And yes it was a snide remark. I know ATF agents, and they are all excellent investigators.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top