Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Why buy multiple AR lowers?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Nugilum, Feb 11, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Nugilum

    Nugilum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,003
    Location:
    Texas Panhandle
    OK, I'm reading posts all over the internet that people are buying as many AR lowers as they can afford in leu of the anticipated second AWB.

    Uhh, I think I missed something here... :confused:

    I can see having two lowers for redundancy, but wouldn't it be more economically efficient to purchase as many different uppers as possible? Wouldn't the ATF see someone with multiple AR lowers as a potential unlicensed dealer and "take an interest" in that individual? :uhoh:

    Please educate me. :)
     
  2. DogBonz

    DogBonz Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,068
    Location:
    NJ
    Resale my boy.....

    Resale. A lot of folks think that they will be able to turn a quick buck if the AWB II goes through by reselling a $200 lower (the part that the ATF considers the "gun") at inflated prices due to the artificial lack of supply and the consistent or increased demand.
     
  3. Fumbler

    Fumbler Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2004
    Messages:
    1,508
    Location:
    Rocky Mount, NC, USA
    This is the idea:

    A proposed ban would probably affect rifles sold or manufactured after a certain date.
    The lower on an AR is what countas as a "rifle."
    If you buy multiple lowers before the ban then you may be able to put whatever you want on it after the ban.

    They won't ban the features on uppers because uppers are "just part" whereas the lower "is" the rifle.

    Of course, this doesn't matter if the ban requires you to prove that the gun was purchased in a preban configuration.

    The supply of AR lowers won't decrease after a ban...but the supply of preban lowers would.
     
  4. BozemanMT

    BozemanMT Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2003
    Messages:
    1,223
    Location:
    Longmont CO
    On an AR, the lower is the gun. The upper is just machine parts.

    On an FAL, the upper is the gun, the lower is just machine parts.

    But they are buying the "gun" now, and worrying about the rest later.
     
  5. MMcfpd

    MMcfpd Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    808
    Location:
    Houston, TX USA
    Of course, whatever the rules were before may have no bearing on what as yet unwritten law may decree.
     
  6. RockyMtnTactical

    RockyMtnTactical Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,539
    It's not resale for me. I want to be able to build up 1 or two of every different configuration I can think of... :evil:
     
  7. Gene_WI

    Gene_WI Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2006
    Messages:
    148
    Location:
    Madison WI
    What makes you think that assembly will be legal.
     
  8. Bazooka Joe71

    Bazooka Joe71 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,803
    Location:
    Southern Indiana
    That's just the thing...We don't.

    BUT, it is worth a few hundred to me, to have a couple of extra lowers as an insurance policy if the EBRs(the lowers) actually do get banned. Since uppers are the expensive part, I can't afford to have every configuration I want, but for pretty cheap I can have a few extra stripped lowers lying around in case assembling them isn't illegal.
     
  9. DoubleTapDrew

    DoubleTapDrew Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,356
    Location:
    Oregon
    To arm the freedom fighters? :p

    Didn't HR1022 outlaw evil uppers and accessories as well?
     
  10. BBsteel

    BBsteel Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    244
    To have and to hold!
     
  11. RockyMtnTactical

    RockyMtnTactical Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,539
    Even if they make a law that makes it illegal to build up more after the ban, having some lowers on hand would make it much easier and faster to build them up quickly before that ban takes effect...
     
  12. MRIman

    MRIman Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2007
    Messages:
    453
    Location:
    City in the Hills,NY
    Think of the children!!!
     
  13. Gary G23

    Gary G23 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,451
    Location:
    Corvette City
    How would the ATF know? Even if you bought several the same day a multiple disposition report would not have to be filed unless they were registered as pistols.
     
  14. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Nug, for $125 you are buying an AR-15. For one of your uppers, I can buy 3 AR-15s.
     
  15. beemerphile

    beemerphile Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2008
    Messages:
    74
    Location:
    Danielsville, GA USA
    As I remember in the previous ban, a gun assembled with a legal pre-ban lower and illegal scary features in the upper is still illegal unless it was sold that way prior to the ban. Assembling a gun with scary features may not be legal post the next ban. A gun bought complete with scary features ought to be ok. I would buy guns instead of lowers.
     
  16. Nugilum

    Nugilum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,003
    Location:
    Texas Panhandle
    I remember the first AWB as beemerphile described it.

    So basically people are betting that AWB2 will be different from AWB1, mainly with the cessation of new civilian owned ARs.

    But don't you think that the gun control politicians remember what happened to them in the 1994 elections after the AWB was passed? The ARs were not outright banned in AWB, just prevented the "evil scary features" configurations (remember those drive-by bayonetings are getting out of hand) That AWB was one huge factor for Congress to swing Republican for the first time in over 40 years.

    Wouldn't an outright ban cause a tremendous back-lash, even greater than 1994?
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2008
  17. Zach S

    Zach S Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    5,523
    Location:
    Western NC
    No. It was just illegal to put them on post ban lowers. Most manufactures had a disclaimer saying so on the website, BM's would pop up every time you opened the pre-ban uppers page. You check out an upper, hit the back button, and it would pop up again...

    It was supposed to be assembled before the ban. So, take your no ban upper, and put on on your new lower. SAW. Put it on another, its another SAW. Then later on, you're not building them, youre restoring them to a previous configuartion:p
     
  18. RockyMtnTactical

    RockyMtnTactical Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,539
    Absolutely, especially since the ownership of "assault rifles" has been gaining steam since the end of the ban on 2004...

    But why wait for them to take them away? An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure...
     
  19. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,557
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    I am buying multiple lowers for me-n-mine, not for resale.
     
  20. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    The reason is that the lower is the rifle, for legal purposes. Any new AWB is most likely going to restrict sale of lowers. It may well do something else as well (see below), but it will almost certainly also place some restrictions on lowers. Since the lower is the cheaper/easier part to assemble, it makes sense to hedge your bets and get a few now. Bonus points if you buy it via private transaction.

    Now, the real problem is that no one knows what this hypothetical new ban will look like. We have the old AWB and the current HB1022 to use as guidelines, but the final product, if it ever gets passed, may look nothing like either. So, just buying a few lowers and thinking you're safe is a bad idea. Fight the legislation, pay attention to the bills, and make sure you can do what you want to do if the stupid thing passes.

    One thing you can do, and MAY help, is to buy a few stripped lowers and assemble them (use one parts kit if you're super cheap, moving from one to the other) and then mate them with a functional upper. Voila! Your stripped lowers are now fully functional "assault weapons", assembled in February 2008. Take pictures. Make sure you get the S/Ns. Have them notarized. Put it all in your safe deposit box, just in case.

    Is this 100%? Absolutely not. But it's relatively cheap and easy, and it MAY help in the future.

    Mike
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page